Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane

Authors


  • Disclosures: The authors report that the Courriels Cochrane program was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Réseau francophone Cochrane, and Practice Solutions, a Canadian Medical Association company. The program was supported by the College of Family Physicians of Canada, the Collège des médecins du Québec, the Family Medicine departments of Quebec, and the Canadian Cochrane Centre. Pierre Pluye holds a New Investigator Award from the CIHR. France Légaré is funded by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Primary Care.

Abstract

Introduction:

Systematic literature reviews provide best evidence, but are underused by clinicians. Thus, integrating Cochrane reviews into continuing medical education (CME) is challenging. We designed a pilot CME program where summaries of Cochrane reviews (Courriels Cochrane) were disseminated by e-mail. Program participants automatically received CME credit for each Courriel Cochrane they rated. The feasibility of this program is reported (delivery, participation, and participant evaluation).

Method:

We recruited French-speaking physicians through the Canadian Medical Association. Program delivery and participation were documented. Participants rated the informational value of Courriels Cochrane using the Information Assessment Method (IAM), which documented their reflective learning (relevance, cognitive impact, use for a patient, expected health benefits). IAM responses were aggregated and analyzed.

Results:

The program was delivered as planned. Thirty Courriels Cochrane were delivered to 985 physicians, and 127 (12.9%) completed at least one IAM questionnaire. Out of 1109 Courriels Cochrane ratings, 973 (87.7%) conta-ined 1 or more types of positive cognitive impact, while 835 (75.3%) were clinically relevant. Participants reported the use of information for a patient and expected health benefits in 595 (53.7%) and 569 (51.3%) ratings, respectively.

Discussion:

Program delivery required partnering with 5 organizations. Participants valued Courriels Cochrane. IAM ratings documented their reflective learning. The aggregation of IAM ratings documented 3 levels of CME outcomes: participation, learning, and performance. This evaluation study demonstrates the feasibility of the Courriels Cochrane as an approach to further disseminate Cochrane systematic literature reviews to clinicians and document self-reported knowledge translation associated with Cochrane reviews.

Ancillary