SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Argo, J., Dahl, D.W., & Morales, A. (2008). Positive consumer contagion: responses to attractive others in a retail context. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 690701.
  • Baker, M.J., & Gilbert, C. Jr. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 538555.
  • Bohra, K. & Pandey, J. (1984). Ingratiation toward strangers, friends and bosses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 217222.
  • Buss, D.M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D.S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52, 12191229.
  • Byrne, D. (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In L. Berkovritz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 3589). 4. New York: Academic Press.
  • Campbell, M.C., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 6983.
  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752766.
  • Chan, E., & Sengupta, J. (2010). Insincere flattery actually works: A dual attitudes perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 122133.
  • Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285290.
  • Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Eastman, K. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder: An attributional approach to ingratiation and organizational citizenship behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(5, Oct.), 13791391.
  • Farmer, S.M., Maslyn, J.M., Fedor, D.B., & Goodman, J.S. (1997). Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 1742.
  • Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fogg, B.J., & Nass, C. (1997). Silicon Sycophants: The Effects of Computers that Flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 441561
  • Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 131.
  • Gordon, R.A. (1996). Impact of Ingratiation on Judgments and Evaluations: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5470.
  • Gould, S., & Penley, L. (1984). Career Strategies and Salary Progression: A Study of Their Relationships in a Municipal Bureaucracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 244265.
  • Harrison, A.W., Hochwarter, W.A., Perrewe, P., & Ralston, D. (1998). The ingratiation construct: An assessment of the validity of the measure of ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 932943.
  • Hendrick, C., & Page, H.A. (1970). Self-esteem, attitude similarity, and attraction. Journal of Personality, 38, 588601.
  • Hodges, L.A., & Byrne, D. (1972). Verbal dogmatism as a potentiator of intolerance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 312317.
  • Jiang L., Hoegg, J., Dahl, D.W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2010) The persuasive role of incidental similarity on attitudes and purchase intentions in a sales context. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 778791.
  • Judge, T.A., & Bretz, R.D. (1994). Political Influence Behavior and Career Success. Journal of Management, 20, 4365.
  • Jones, E.E. (1964). Ingratiation: A Social Psychological Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Kumar, K., & Beyerlein, M. (1991). Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 619627.
  • Main, K.J. (2004). Ulterior Motives vs. Irrational Suspicion: Flattery as a Cue in Sales Transactions (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from UBC Retrospective Theses Digitization Project http://hdl.handle.net/2429/17199.
  • Main, K.J., Dahl, D.W., & Darke, P.R. (2007). Deliberative and automatic bases of suspicion: Empirical evidence of the sinister attribution error. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 5969.
  • McColl, R., & Truong, Y. (2013). The Effects of Facial Attractiveness and Gender on Customer Evaluations During A Web-Video Sales Encounter. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 33(1), 117128.
  • McQuarrie, E.F., & Phillips, B.J. (2005). Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors in Pictures and Words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 721.
  • Oliver, R.L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57, 2549.
  • Pallak, S.R. (1983). Salience of a communicator's physical attractiveness and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2, 158170.
  • Pandelaere, M., Briers, B., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2010). Better think before agreeing twice: Mere agreement: A similarity-based persuasion mechanism. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(2), 133141.
  • Pandey, J. & Singh, S. (1987). Effects of Machiavellianism, Other-Enhancement, and Power Position on Affect, Power Feeling, and Evaluation of the Ingratiator, Journal of Psychology, 121(3), 287300.
  • Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847855.
  • Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp.4172). New York: Guilford
  • Preacher, K.J., Rucker, D.D., & Hayes, A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, Methods and Prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185227.
  • Ralston, D.A. (1985). Employee ingratiation: The role of management. Academy ofManagement Review, 10, 477487.
  • Reagor, P.A., & Clore, G.L. (1970). Attraction, test anxiety, and similarity-dissimilarity of test performance. Psychonomic Science, 18, 21920.
  • Reinhard, M., Messner, M., & Sporer, S.L. (2006). Explicit persuasive intent and its impact on success at persuasion - the determining roles of attractiveness and likeableness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 249259.
  • Saini R., & Thota, S.C. (2010). The psychological underpinnings of relative thinking in price comparisons. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2), 185192.
  • Silvia, P.J. (2005). Deflecting reactance: The role of similarity in increasing compliance and reducing resistance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 277284.
  • Thacker, R., & Wayne, S.J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21(4), 739756.
  • van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., Blaauw, E., & Vermunt, R. (1999). Relational Considerations in the Use of Influence Tactics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 806819.
  • Vonk, R. (1998). Effects of cooperative and competitive outcome dependency on attention and impression preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(3), 26589.
  • Wayne, S.J., & Ferris, G.R. (1990), “Influence tactics, Affect and Exchange Quality in Supervisor-Subordinate Interactions: A Laboratory Experiment and Field Study,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487499.
  • Williams, K.D., Bourgeois, M.J., & Croyle, R.T. (1993). The effects of stealing thunder in criminal and civil trials. Law and Human Behavior, 17(6), 597.
  • Wood, W., & Eagly, A.H. (1981). Stages in the Analysis of Persuasive Messages: The Role of Causal Attributions and Message Comprehension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 246259.
  • Wood, W., & Quinn, J.M. (2003). Forewarned and forearmed? Two meta-analysis syntheses of forewarnings of influence appeals. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 119138.
  • Yukl, G., & Tracey, B. (1992). “Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers and the Boss”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525535.