Get access

Common vulnerabilities of RTO implementations in real chemical processes

Authors

  • André D. Quelhas,

    1. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária. CP: 68502, Rio de Janeiro, 21945-970 RJ, Brazil
    Current affiliation:
    1. Petrobras—Petróleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Normando José Castro de Jesus,

    1. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária. CP: 68502, Rio de Janeiro, 21945-970 RJ, Brazil
    Current affiliation:
    1. Braskem SA, Brazil.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • José Carlos Pinto

    Corresponding author
    1. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária. CP: 68502, Rio de Janeiro, 21945-970 RJ, Brazil
    • Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária. CP: 68502, Rio de Janeiro, 21945-970 RJ, Brazil
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Real-time optimisation (RTO) systems face challenging scenarios in industrial practice, such as incomplete and corrupted process information, uncertain large-scale mathematical models and numerical optimisation issues. Proper design of RTO structure and robust diagnosis tools are keys for good performance, although they are neglected in commercial RTO software and not fully solved in the technical literature. This article reviews the concepts behind the two-step RTO approach and suggests performance metrics. It also points out the large list of structural decisions and the consequences of intuitive, experience-based RTO design choices. The discussed vulnerabilities are illustrated with some simulations and real industrial implementations. © 2012 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary