Monitoring Editor: Peter Baas
The role of small GTPases in neuronal morphogenesis and polarity †
Article first published online: 12 JUN 2012
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Special Issue: Emerging Concepts in Neuronal Cytoskeleton
Volume 69, Issue 7, pages 464–485, July 2012
How to Cite
Gonzalez-Billault, C., Muñoz-Llancao, P., Henriquez, D. R., Wojnacki, J., Conde, C. and Caceres, A. (2012), The role of small GTPases in neuronal morphogenesis and polarity . Cytoskeleton, 69: 464–485. doi: 10.1002/cm.21034
- Issue published online: 6 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 12 JUN 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 17 MAY 2012 02:20PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 APR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 12 APR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 23 DEC 2011
- FONDECYT. Grant Number: 1095089
- ICM. Grant Number: P05-001-F
- Millennium Scientific Initiative
- CONICYT (Chile)
- ANPCyT and Agencia Cordoba Ciencia
- neuronal polarity;
- cytoskeleton dynamics;
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
The highly dynamic remodeling and cross talk of the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton support neuronal morphogenesis. Small RhoGTPases family members have emerged as crucial regulators of cytoskeletal dynamics. In this review we will comprehensively analyze findings that support the participation of RhoA, Rac, Cdc42, and TC10 in different neuronal morphogenetic events ranging from migration to synaptic plasticity. We will specifically address the contribution of these GTPases to support neuronal polarity and axonal elongation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
The development and maintenance of the unique shape of most neuron types involves a complex series of events that start when spherical neuronal progenitors become asymmetric [Da Silva and Dotti, 2002]. They gradually adopt a polarized morphology by extending a single long axon and several much shorter dendrites that eventually connect with axons at synapses [Jan and Jan, 2003, 2010; Wiggin et al., 2005; Arimura and Kaibuchi, 2007; Barnes and Polleux, 2009; de la Torre-Ubieta and Boni, 2011]. There is considerable interest in learning about the mechanisms underlying neuronal shaping and polarization since they are central for understanding the complex connectivity and functioning of the nervous system, as well as for helping to solve many disorders involving nerve degeneration and failure to regenerate, as in spinal cord or brain injuries, cerebrovascular accidents, and neurodegenerative diseases [de la Torre-Ubieta and Boni, 2011]. This article focuses on the role of the small Rho GTPases family members RhoA, Rac, Cdc42 and Tc10 in regulating cytoskeletal organization and dynamics [Conde and Cáceres, 2009], as well as membrane addition [Pfenninger, 2009] during neuronal morphogenesis and polarization [Arimura and Kaibuchi, 2007; Tahirovic and Bradke, 2009; Hall and Lalli, 2010; de la Torre-Ubieta and Boni, 2011].
The initial and very well characterized observations on the functions of small Rho GTPases [Etienne-Manneville and Hall, 2002] established that they promote actin reorganization, with RhoA (Ras homology member A) regulating stress fiber formation and cell contraction [Ridley and Hall, 1992; Nobes and Hall, 1995], whilst Rac1 (Ras-related C3 Botulinum substrate 1) and Cdc42 (Cell division cycle 42) induce extensive protrusive activities that include the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia, respectively [Ridley et al., 1992; Hall et al., 1993a; Nobes and Hall, 1995; Hall, 1998; 2005]. More recent studies have revealed that small Rho GTPases in association with factors that control their expression, activity, lifespan, or subcellular localization, act as “spatiotemporal signaling modules” [Pertz, 2010] modulating microtubule organization, dynamics, plus-end capture and cross talk with actin-based structures, such as growth cone actin ribs [Paglini et al., 1998a), actin arcs [Zhang et al., 2003; Burnette et al., 2008], actin bundles and the subcortical cytoskeleton [Jaffe and Hall, 2005; Li and Gundersen, 2008; Lowery and Van Vactor, 2009].
The Rho Family of Small GTPases. Molecular and Structural Considerations
The Rho family of GTPases comprises a subgroup of the Ras superfamily of small (20–30 kDa) GTP-binding proteins. These proteins are ubiquitously expressed across many species, from yeast to human. The small GTPases act as molecular switches, cycling between an active GTP-bound state and an inactive GDP-bound state [Etienne-Manneville and Hall, 2002; Pertz, 2010]. Rho GTPases are activated mainly through several cell-surface receptors via guanine-exchange factors, including cytokine, tyrosine kinase and adhesion receptors, as well as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) [Kjoller and Hall, 1999; Schiller, 2006]. Rho GTPases interact with a myriad of effectors controlling many components of brain development and functioning such as neuronal migration [Hall, 2005], cell adhesion [Nobes and Hall, 1995] and morphogenesis [Hall and Nobes, 2000; Hall, 2005]. Thus, almost all aspects of neuronal polarization, one of the main issues of this review, are controlled by small Rho-GTPases [Luo et al., 1997; Luo, 2000; Ng et al., 2002; Jan and Jan, 2003, 2010; Ng and Luo, 2004; Govek et al., 2005; Arimura and Kaibuchi, 2007; de Curtis, 2008; Hall and Lalli, 2010].
To date, 22 mammalian members of the Rho GTPase family have been identified and subdivided into several groups on the basis of their amino acid composition. These members include Rho (A, B and C isoforms), Cdc42, Rac (1, 2 and 3 isoforms), Rnd (Rnd1, Rnd2 and Rnd3/RhoE), RhoD, Rif (RhoF), RhoG, TTF (RhoH), mitochondrial Rho/RhoT (Miro1 and Miro2), TC10/RhoQ, Chp/RhoV and atypical members such as RhoBTB.
The canonical structure of Rho GTPases consists of several motifs (Fig. 1). An effector domain becomes accessible to targets when GTP is loaded (active conformation). In contrast, when GDP is bound, the effector domain acquires an inactive conformation and is hidden for binding to downstream effectors. These changes in structure are restricted to two switch domains [Hakoshima et al., 2003]. In the C-terminal domain there is a Hyper Variable Region (HVR; Fig. 1) that differs not only between the Rho GTPase subclasses but also within the same subclass in terms of the presence of either a polybasic region or a palmitoylation site [Ridley, 2006]. The polybasic region and palmitoylation site present in the HVR are involved in targeting of GTPases to plasma membrane or endomembrane compartments [Michaelson, 2001]. A C-terminal CAAX-box (C, cysteine; A, Aliphatic Amino acid; X, any amino acid) contains a cysteine residue, which is crucial for prenylation that adds a farnesyl or geranylgeranyl group, enhancing their interactions with membranes and very often defining their localization to specific membrane compartments. Then, the remaining aliphatic and variable amino acids undergo proteolysis and replacement by a methyl group [Adamson et al., 1992; Wennerberg and Der, 2004; Samuel and Hynds, 2010].
On the other hand, one striking feature of atypical Rho GTPases, like those in the RhoBTB group is a non-functional GTPase domain followed by a proline rich region, and a C-terminal Bric-a-brac, Tramtrack, and Broad-complex (BTB) domain, a module known to mediate protein-protein interactions. The RhoBTB subfamily consists of 3 isoforms: RhoBTB1, RhoBTB2, and RhoBTB3 (Fig. 1) [Ramos et al., 2002; Berthold et al., 2008]. Interestingly, RhoBTB3 behaves as an ATPase involved in Rab9-mediated late endosome to Golgi trafficking [Espinosa et al., 2009; Danglot and Galli, 2009].
The on/off cycling and target accessibility of Rho-GTPases are controlled by different groups of proteins. There are two primary classes of molecules that control the switching: 1) Guanine exchanging factors (GEFs), which catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP [Hart et al., 1991; Schmidt and Hall, 2002]; and 2) GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which enhance the relatively slow intrinsic GTPase activity of Rho proteins. GEFs promote the activation of Rho-GTPase family members, whereas GAPs act as inhibitory factors. A third set of regulatory proteins are the guanine nucleotide-dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) that maintain a large pool of RhoGTPases in the cytosol in a GDP-bound state [Sasaki and Takai, 1998; Dovas and Couchman, 2005; Garcia Mata et al., 2011] (Fig. 2).
Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor
The first mammalian GEF was originally identified as an oncogene from human diffuse B-lymphoma cells and designated as Dbl [Hart et al., 1991; Zheng et al., 1996; Zheng, 2001]. In humans, approximately 70 GEFs have been described; most of them contain a Dbl-homology (DH) domain and an adjacent Pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. In most cases, they provide the minimal structural unit required to catalyze the GDP-GTP exchange reaction [Chen et al., 1997; Baumeister et al., 2003]. A non-conventional Rho-GEF family, whose members lack DH domains, has also been identified [Meller and Merlot, 2005]. These proteins, designated as CZH (CDM and Zizimin homology) or 180 kDa protein downstream of CRK (DOCK180)-related proteins, contain two highly homologous regions [Dock homology regions (DHR1 and DHR2)] that mediate nucleotide exchange [Meller and Merlot, 2005].
DH domains interact extensively with the Switch regions of GTPases (Switch I, residues 28–44 and Switch II, residues 62–69 in human RhoA, respectively), which are domains for nucleotide binding [Hakoshima et al., 2003; Meller and Merlot, 2005]. The nucleotide exchange mechanism involves sequential steps in which the RhoGEF interacts with a rigid zone of the RhoGTPase and a portion of Switch II. This interaction (GTPase-GEF) promotes conformational changes of Switch I allowing dissociation of GDP and Mg2+ leaving the nucleotide binding pocket fully exposed for binding to GTP-Mg2+ [for details: Worthylake et al., 2000; Hakoshima et al., 2003; Rossman et al., 2005].
GTPase Activating Proteins
GAPs increase the rate of GTP hydrolysis by more than 100 times. The first GAP identified for Rho family GTPases was p50 RhoGAP [Garrett et al., 1989] and since then, more than 70 members have been characterized in eukaryotes. The human genome is predicted to encode between 59 and 70 proteins containing a RhoGAP domain, and to date more than half have been identified [Venter et al., 2001; Peck et al., 2002; Bernards, 2003]. The structure of p50 RhoGAP-RhoA has been well characterized [Rittinger et al., 1997a,b; Hakoshima et al., 2003].
Guanine Nucleotide Dissociation Inhibitors
There are only three well-defined RhoGDIs [Garcia Mata et al., 2011], including RhoGDI-1 (α), RhoGDI-2 (β) and RhoGDI-3 (γ). These proteins fold into an immunoglobulin-like β sandwich followed by a helix-turn-helix motif in the N-terminus that generates a hydrophobic pocket, which binds and encompasses the C-terminal regions of Rho GTPases containing isoprenylation of the conserved cysteine within the CAAX box. When associated with GTPases, the GDI-GTPase complex comprises a cytoplasmic pool of inactive prenylated proteins [Garcia Mata et al., 2011: for an excellent recent review on Rho-GDIs].
In the following sections, we will focus on specific GEFs, GAPs and GDIs for Rho, Rac and Cdc42, which have been implicated in neuronal morphogenesis.
The Rho Family (RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC)
This family is composed of three members, namely RhoA, B and C. RhoA and RhoC share a structural identity of 92% and 82% with RhoB, respectively, and all three members are post-translationally modified by prenylation at the C-terminal cysteine. Additionally, RhoA and RhoC can be geranylgeranylated [Wheeler and Ridley, 2004; Primeau and Lamarche-Vane, 2008] while RhoB can be geranylgeranylated, farnesylated and palmitoylated [Wherlock et al., 2004]. Differential post-translational modifications of Rho members are linked with differences in their subcellular localizations and functions [Robertson et al., 1995; Michaelson et al., 2001; Stamatakis et al., 2002; Perez-Sala et al., 2009; Samuel and Hynds, 2010]. While RhoA and RhoC are localized to the cytoplasm or the plasma membrane, RhoB is mainly localized to membranes and to an endo-lysosomal compartment for degradation [Perez-Sala et al., 2009].
Rho proteins are highly expressed in the nervous system, both in neuronal and glial cells [Suidan et al., 1997; Sepp and Auld, 2003]. All have been implicated in several aspects of neural morphogenesis, but RhoA has been the most investigated. Thus, a large body of evidence, mainly from studies in cultured cells, suggests that RhoA and one of its main downstream effectors, the Rho-associated coil-coiled containing-associated protein kinase [ROCK; Kiento and Ridley, 2003] act during a large part of the neuronal morphogenetic program, from neurogenesis and migration to dendritic formation and synaptic plasticity.
RhoA is expressed in the plasma membrane of neural crest progenitors and is down regulated upon delamination [Groysman et al., 2008]. More importantly, loss-of-function of RhoA or inhibition of overall Rho signaling with C3 transferase [Just et al., 2010] enhances premature delamination without affecting cell fate specification [Groysman et al., 2008]. In accordance with this, treatment of neural crest explants with Y27632, an inhibitor of ROCK, or cell permeable C3 toxin, accelerates migration without affecting proliferation [Groysman et al., 2008]. These treatments also reduce stress fiber formation, focal adhesions and membrane-bound N-cadherin. Conversely, activation of RhoA with LPA inhibits migration [Groysman et al., 2008]. A role for RhoA in regulating migration of cortical neurons has also been reported [Pacary et al., 2011]. These authors showed that two proneural transcription factors, Neurog2 and Ascl1, promote migration of newborn cortical neurons by inducing expression of the atypical Rho GTPases, Rnd2 and Rnd3, which in turn inhibit RhoA activity at different steps of the migratory process [Heng et al., 2008; Pacary et al., 2011; Lin and Anton, 2011].
Another set of studies showed that RhoA regulates apoptosis [Coleman et al., 2001; Coleman and Olson, 2002], proliferation and cell division in the developing cerebral cortex, rather than migration or layering. Programmed cell death plays a central role in shaping the organization of neuronal circuits and RhoA appears to be actively involved. Thus, a mouse line in which a dominant negative (DN) RhoA mutant (N19-RhoA) is expressed in all post-natal developing neurons led to no major changes in neocortical anatomy [Sanno et al., 2010]. However, the density and absolute number of neurons in the somatosensory cortex increased by 12–26% compared with wild-type littermates. This was not associated with a change in neuronal migration during formation of cortical layers, but rather with a large decrease in the amount of neuronal apoptosis at postnatal day 5, when a developmental peak of cortical apoptosis occurs. In addition, overexpression of RhoA in cortical neurons caused high levels of apoptosis. Moreover, inhibition of RhoA decreased the number of cleaved caspase-3-expressing neurons in the cortex, whereas overexpression of wild-type RhoA activated caspase-3, suggesting that RhoA acts upstream of this key executor of the apoptotic pathway [Sanno et al., 2010]. Proteins that promote RhoA activation such as GEF-H1 or Lfc (Lbc [lymphoid blast crisis]'s first cousin), have also been implicated in the generation of cortical neurons by regulating proliferative symmetrical versus neurogenic asymmetrical cell divisions [Gauthier-Fisher et al., 2009].
Neurite formation, a fundamental step for initiating migration and the extension of axon and dendrites, also involves RhoA. Both in situ and in vitro neuritogenesis begins with the breakage of the neuronal sphere, as budding neurites emerge from the cell body [Da Silva and Dotti, 2002; Da Silva et al., 2003]. These neurites extend progressively until one of them (the future axon) starts growing more rapidly; as neurites extend further and acquire their final axonal or dendritic identities, they establish functional synaptic contacts and consolidate polarization. Several lines of evidence suggest that RhoA is a negative regulator of neuritogenesis, including axon-dendrite formation [Da Silva et al., 2003; Conde et al., 2010].
Ectopic expression of constitutively active (CA) RhoA inhibits neurite sprouting in neuronal cell lines [Kozma et al., 1997] and minor process formation in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons [Threadgill et al., 1997; Chuang et al., 2005; Conde et al., 2010]. Likewise, factors that induce growth cone collapse and neurite retraction or arrest nerve regeneration, like LPA [Jalink et al., 1993, 1994] and Nogo [Fournier et al., 2000; Schwab, 2004; Kim et al., 2011; Schmandke and Strittmatter, 2007], or direct/stop axon guidance/advance, like netrin/slit [Murray et al., 2010] or Sema 3A [Aizawa et al., 2001] act through a RhoA-ROCK mediated signaling cascade. Disheveled (Dvl)-mediated activation of RhoA-ROCK is also involved in Wnt-3a-induced neurite retraction in rat PC-12 and mouse/N1E-115 cells [Kishida et al., 2004; Tsuji et al., 2010]. LIMK1 [Rosso et al., 2004], a kinase that phosphorylates and inactivates the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin [Bamburg, 1999; Bernstein and Bamburg, 2010], is phosphorylated and activated by ROCK, mediating several of the neurite retraction effects of RhoA [Aizawa et al., 2001; Ng and Luo, 2004].
Conversely, inactivation of RhoA/ROCK by pharmacological agents or ectopic expression of DN mutants enhances neurite formation. In hippocampal cultures, treatment of stage 2 neurons with toxin B [Bradke and Dotti, 1998], C3 toxin [Jalink et al., 1994; Da Silva et al., 2003; Arimura and Kaibuchi, 2007], Y27632 [Da Silva et al, 2003; Sanchez et al., 2008], or expression of DN RhoA [Chuang et al., 2005] or reduction of Rho A activity by suppression of Lfc [Conde et al., 2010] enhances axonal elongation and/or induces the formation of supernumerary axon-like neurites. Interestingly, neurons incubated with RhoA inhibitory C3 toxin lead to increased neuronal sprouting characterized by the presence of longer neurites. Moreover, these cells showed decreased actin filament polymerization [Da Silva et al., 2003], consistent with observations suggesting that increased actin dynamics is required for axon initiation [Bradke and Dotti, 1999; Kunda et al., 2001; Conde et al., 2010] and that down regulation of RhoA activity parallels the transformation of a minor neurite into an axon. Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) experiments using a RhoA biosensor [Pertz, 2010] revealed high RhoA activity in growth cones of minor processes of stage 2 or 3 hippocampal neurons compared with axonal shafts or their growth cones (Fig. 3). Taken together, these observations argue for the existence of a RhoA-ROCK inhibitory tone that limits neurite sprouting, enhancing actin stability and preventing axon formation. LIMK1 and profilin IIa, as well as inhibition of a Rac-Cdc42 signaling pathway are likely to mediate the effects of RhoA-ROCK on actin dynamics, neuritogenesis and axon formation [Da Silva et al., 2003; Rosso et al., 2004; Conde and Caceres, 2009; Conde et al., 2010]. In other systems, the inhibitory role of RhoA on axon formation and polarization is less clear. For example, in rodent enteric neurons, Smurf, a SMAD-specific E-3 ubiquitin proteasome protein ligase 1 that causes RhoA degradation, promotes axon elongation without inducing multiple axon formation [Bhupinder et al., 2007].
RhoA has also been implicated in regulating the complex structure of dendritic arbors and their spines [Van Aelst and Cline, 2004; Jan and Jan, 2010]. Time-lapse imaging of developing dendrites within the brains of zebrafish or Xenopus tadpoles [Cline, 2001] has revealed that dendrogenesis follows a stereotyped sequence of events that involves the addition and retraction of many fine filopodial branches to the primary arbor; some branches are stabilized and become a substrate for further branching and extension. The iteration of this process (addition, stabilization and extension) leads to the generation of intricate dendritic trees [Van Aelst and Cline, 2004]. Expression of active forms of RhoA in Xenopus tectal and retinal ganglion cells [Ruchhoeft et al., 1999; Wong et al., 2000; Li et al., 2000], or “Drosophila” mushroom body (MB) neurons [Lee et al., 2000] or cultured hippocampal neurons [Nakayama et al., 2000] restrain dendrite growth. Conversely, suppression or inactivation of RhoA in MB neurons or Xenopus tectal neurons increased dendritic length [Li et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2000]. However, in other model systems, such as cultured hippocampal neurons, where overexpression of RhoA inhibits dendrogenesis, no effects were observed after ectopic expression of a DN mutant [Nakayama et al., 2000]. To explain this apparent discrepancy, it was proposed that inhibition of RhoA is a physiological phenomenon to allow dendrite growth; thus, no further inhibition can be achieved by expressing a DN mutant [Van Aelst and Cline, 2004]. Interestingly, Cux4, a transcription factor that limits dendritic growth in cortical pyramidal neurons acts through activation of RhoA [Li et al., 2010].
Dendritic growth is highly sensitive to afferent activity. Live imaging of dendritic arbors of tectal neurons expressing GFP fusion mutants of RhoGTPases, in the presence or absence of visual stimulation, revealed that branch addition and stabilization are Rac-mediated, whereas extension involves inhibition of RhoA activity [for further details: Sin et al., 2002; Niell et al., 2004; Van Aelst and Cline, 2004].
Dendritic spines are highly dynamic actin-rich protrusions that undergo remodeling triggered by neurotransmitters and neurotrophins. Not surprisingly, RhoA has emerged as an important regulator of spine formation and synaptic plasticity. Expression of a CA RhoA decreases spine length in slices of CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons; interestingly, this phenotype was mimicked by down regulation of oligophrenin-1 [Govek et al., 2004]. It was also shown that the effect of oligophrenin-1 on spine structure involves the RhoA-ROCK pathway [Van Aelst and Cline, 2004]. Furthermore, mutations in oligophrenin-1 are linked with mental retardation [Bienvenu et al., 1997; Bergmann et al., 2003]. Other studies have demonstrated that increases in spine density and length induced by NMDA receptor activity [Shepherd and Huganir, 2006] are negatively regulated by an Lfc-RhoA signaling cascade [Ryan et al., 2005; Kang et al., 2009]. The function of RhoA has also been tested in behavioral studies where ROCK inhibition in the amygdala of intact animals blocks fear conditioning [Lamprecht et al., 2002].
Current evidence also suggests that RhoB has a role in regulating spine morphogenesis and synaptic plasticity [McNair et al., 2010]. For example, RhoB, but not RhoA or Rac, is specifically activated during LTP [O'Kane et al., 2003]. More recent studies have used RhoB-/- mice to show that the early phase of LTP is significantly reduced in the KO animals, whereas the later phase is unaffected [McNair et al., 2010]. In addition, the RhoB-/- animals have a decrease in phosphorylated LIMK1, increased dendritic branching, and fewer, but larger spines. The formin mDia2 interacts with RhoB in endosomes, and when down regulated with RNAi produces a spine phenotype similar to that of RhoB −/− neurons [Wallar et al., 2007; Hotulainen et al., 2009]. Membrane recycling is required for spine growth and maintenance [Park et al., 2006], so RhoB-mDia could be part of a signaling pathway controlling membrane trafficking from recycling endosomes to dendritic spine membranes during synaptic plasticity. Another unique aspect of RhoB is that it interacts with MAP1A [Lajoie-Mazenc et al., 2008], a microtubule-associated protein involved in activity-driven dendritic remodeling [Szebenyi et al., 2005]. In this regard, it is worth noting that MAP1B interacts with the Rac GEFs, Tiam1/Tiam2, and regulates spine formation by a mechanism involving increased RhoA activity [Tortosa et al., 2011]. These interactions are of great interest since they may serve to link dendritic spine microtubules [Hoogenraad and Bradke, 2009] with the actin cytoskeleton.
Rho Regulators and Effectors
Regulatory mechanisms are different for the three members of the Rho family (Fig. 4). For example, RhoA, B and C share high similarity except in a defined region around Switch 1, suggesting that they have different affinities for regulators or effector proteins [Wheeler and Ridley, 2004]. However, most work has focused on the modulation of RhoA activity. RhoGDIs inactivate Rho by inhibiting the dissociation of the GDP nucleotide [Adra et al., 1997; Dovas and Couchman, 2005] after removal from the plasma membrane [Dransart et al., 2005; Garcia Mata et al., 2011].
Current evidence suggests that RhoGDIs may have important neuronal functions. For example, Rho inhibition promotes axon growth on inhibitory substrates and regeneration in the injured CNS. Thus, several studies have shown that Nogo, MAG and other myelin-derived axon growth inhibitors activate RhoA [Pearse, 2004]. Interestingly, this activation involves sequestering RhoGDI from the membrane by p75NTR; thus, inhibitors of RhoA are potential therapeutic targets for promoting recovery after spinal cord injury [Yamashita and Tohyama, 2003; Zurn and Bartlow, 2006]. Down regulation of RhoGDI leads to differentiation of the neural stem cell line C17.2, whereas suppression of RhoGDI was associated with decreased expression of RhoA, Cdc42, LIMK1 and WASP [Lu et al., 2008]. These intriguing results highlight the importance of further exploring the role of GDIs in neuronal development.
Phosphorylation can regulate the affinities between Rho and Rho-GDIs. A recent study has shown that cAMP induces phosphorylation of RhoA and increases binding with Rho-GDI. Moreover, a mutant RhoA (e.g., RhoA S188D) that mimics PKA-mediated phosphorylation induces greater neurite outgrowth than RhoA (S188A) mimicking the dephosphorylated form. Taken together these results suggest that inactivation of RhoA by PKA phosphorylation can participate in neuritogenesis affecting RhoA and the Rho-RhoGDI complex [Jeon et al., 2011]. Interestingly, PKA also phosphorylates and inactivates the Rho-GEF, Lfc [Meiri et al., 2009], which is implicated in axon formation [Conde et al., 2010]. Rho can also be modulated by heterotrimeric G proteins [Kranenburg et al., 1999; Sachdev et al., 2007].
The interaction of Rho-GEFs with microtubules is crucial to regulate cross talk with actin filaments and the plasma membrane. For example, the p190RhoGEF interacts with microtubules through its C-terminal domain adjacent to the DHPH domain. p190RhoGEF localizes and binds RhoA in the plasma membrane and when over expressed, inhibits neurite outgrowth [van Horck et al., 2001]. Another specific RhoA-GEF that binds to microtubules is the brain enriched PDZRhoGEF that is activated by Gα12/13 [Kuner et al., 2002] and interacts with LC2, a light chain of MAP1A or B. It has been proposed that this interaction is essential in the maintenance of neuronal polarity [Longhurst et al., 2006]. Of note is that ubiquitin-mediated degradation of PDZRhoGEF in cultured hippocampal neurons promotes neurite outgrowth [Lin et al., 2011].
Another striking example of a microtubule-regulated Rho-GEF is GEF-H1, the human homolog of Lfc, which is activated upon microtubule depolymerization [Birkenfeld et al., 2008]. In primary cultured neurons, suppression of Lfc induces formation of multiple axon-like neurites and decreases RhoA activity; conversely, ectopic expression of Lfc prevents axon formation, inducing retraction of minor neurites [Conde et al., 2010]. Tctex-1, a dynein light chain implicated in axon outgrowth by modulating actin dynamics and Rac activity [Chuang et al., 2005], colocalizes and physically interacts with Lfc, inhibiting its GEF activity, decreasing Rho-GTP levels, and antagonizing Lfc during neurite formation [Conde et al., 2010].
Kalirin is a brain-specific GEF for RhoA, Rac and RhoG. Alternative splicing generates several Kalirin isoforms; one of them, Kalirin-7 is the most abundant in brain and is enriched in the post-synaptic density where it regulates spine morphology and synaptic plasticity. In fact, Kalirin-7 KO mice showed reduced dendritic branching, fewer spines, alterations in cortical layering, and cognitive deficits [Xie et al., 2007, 2008, 2010]. A Rac specific domain (e.g. GEF1 domain) is present in all isoforms, while a second domain (e.g. GEF2) specific for RhoA is present in Kalirin-9 and Kalirin-12 [Penzes et al., 2001]. Ectopic expression of the Kalirin GEF2 domain (DHPH2) enhances axonal elongation [Penzes et al., 2001]. In sympathetic neurons, ectopic expression of Kalirin induces prolific sprouting of new axonal fibers, a phenomenon dependent on the Kalirin GEF1 domain and mimicked by expression of CA RhoG [May et al., 2002].
A brain-specific GAP for RhoA and Rac, p200RhoGAP, was found in differentiated N1E-115 cells associated with the cortical actin cytoskeleton. It binds to SH3 domains, and is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon association with activated Src in cells. Transient expression of the RhoGAP domain or of the full-length molecule promotes N1E-115 differentiation [Moon et al., 2003]. p190 RhoGAP is a GAP with high specificity for RhoA, rather than Rac or Cdc42 [Kaibuchi et al., 1999]. Although not directly linked with neuronal polarization, some studies have shown its involvement in Nerve Growth Factor-(NGF) or Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor- (bFGF) induced PC12 differentiation and neurite extension, through a mechanism involving RhoA inactivation [Jeon et al., 2010, 2011].
Molecules that act downstream of Rho can be classified into three groups. Class I includes protein kinase N (PKN), rhophilin, and rhotekin; class II includes ROCK-I and ROCK-II9 [Kiento and Ridley, 2003]; and class III includes Citron [Fujisawa et al., 1998]. Class I proteins contain a Rho binding region of 70 amino acids near their N-terminus, known as the HR1 domain. In contrast, class II proteins contain the Rho-binding region towards the C-terminus. Finally, Citron contains a Rho-binding region, which is also localized at the C-terminus, but is unrelated to the Class II or the HR1 sequences [Wheeler and Ridley, 2004]. The Switch 1 region of Rho contains the sequence VFSKD, which is very important for binding to all classes of Rho effectors. This sequence is preserved in RhoA, B, and C and therefore most effector proteins could bind all three Rho family members [Fujisawa et al., 1998; Wheeler and Ridley, 2004].
RhoA, B and C activate ROCK, which in turn can phosphorylate several actin cytoskeleton regulatory proteins, such as myosin light chain (MLC) phosphatase and LIMK. The activation of LIMK by ROCK can then be associated with changes in the phosphorylation levels of ADF/cofilin. Regulation of LIMK1 and cofilin phosphorylation contributes to axon development [Rosso et al., 2004; Garvalov et al., 2007].
Other important downstream effectors of Rho family members are formins, a family of proteins which are essential for nucleation and polarization of straight, unbranched actin filaments [Pruyne et al., 2002]. To date, the most studied members of this family are the mammalian Diaphanous Formin (mDia) 1 and 2. Both formins possess a microtubule binding ability that is independent of their actin polymerization activity, and serves to coordinate actin cytoskeleton rearrangements to modulate microtubule dynamics in migrating cells [Spiering and Hodgson, 2011]. For example, the association of mDia1 with the microtubule plus end capping protein complex EB1/APC, is required to stabilize dynamic microtubule tips during cell migration [Palazzo et al., 2001; Gundersen, 2002; Wen et al., 2004]. mDia also interacts with Ena/VASP proteins that have been implicated in many processes requiring actin remodeling downstream of Rho, including neuronal polarization [Grosse et al., 2003; Shakir et al., 2006; Fleming et al. 2010].
The Rac Family (Rac1, Rac2, Rac3)
Rac family members have also been implicated in several aspects of neuronal morphogenesis, ranging from proliferation and migration to synaptic plasticity. There are three Rac genes in vertebrates encoding the Rac1, Rac2, and Rac3, proteins that share 88–92% sequence identity [Corbetta et al., 2005, 2009]. While Rac1 is ubiquitously expressed, Rac3 is neuron-specific and developmentally regulated [Malosio et al., 1997; Albertinazzi et al., 1998; Bolis et al., 2003]; by contrast, Rac2 is expressed in hematopoietic cells [Didsbury et al., 1989]. The Rac isoforms exhibit their highest amino acid divergence at their C-terminal region [van Hennik et al. 2003; Haataja et al. 1997]. It has been described that Rac1 and Rac3 are also differentially expressed in brain regions, such as the cerebellum [Bolis et al., 2003]. Besides, while Rac3 localizes to the plasma membrane independently of its activation state, inactive Rac1 mainly localizes to the cytoplasm, and is translocated to the membrane after activation [Wennerberg and Der, 2004].
Most studies related with the functioning of Rac isoforms in vertebrate brain tissue have focused on Rac1; less effort has been devoted to Rac3 despite its neuronal-specificity, co-expression with Rac1 and developmentally regulated expression pattern [Hajdo-Milasinovic, 2007, 2009]. A genetic approach has now established that Rac1 and Rac3 are both critical for brain development, shedding light on previous discrepancies [Corbetta et al., 2009] (see below).
Pioneering work in flies showed the importance of Drosophila Rac (DRac) for axon elongation [Luo et al., 1994], and subsequent studies in mammalian brain demonstrated that it also participates in many other aspects of neuronal morphogenesis. For example, a recent study suggests that Rac1 regulates survival of neuronal progenitors [Leone et al., 2010]. It is likely that Rac1 acts in concert with Cdc42 to regulate corticogenesis serving distinct but complementary functions: Cdc42 is required for the maintenance of polarity and normal proliferation in radial glial cells of the ventricular zone (VZ) [Capello et al., 2006], whereas Rac1 regulates survival of cortical progenitors, including those located in the subventricular zone (SVZ) [Leone et al., 2010].
Rac1 has also been implicated in neuronal migration. Initial studies using in utero electroporation of DN Rac1 or the GEFs, Tiam1/Tiam2, into VZ progenitors produced an almost complete inhibition of radial migration of cortical neurons [Kawauchi et al., 2003]. By contrast, conditional deletion of the Rac1 gene using Foxg1-Cre mice produced mild defects in cortical radial migration [Chen et al., 2007]. These authors showed that the inside-to-outside sequence of neurogenesis and migration is preserved in the Rac1-deficient cerebrum; however, tangential migration of ventral telencephalic neurons was considerably compromised. The different severity of migration defects between these two approaches was interpreted as indicative that overexpression of DN mutants likely altered the activity of other RhoGTPases.
Rac1 is present in growth cones where it regulates adhesion and navigational activities [Lowery and van Vactor, 2009]. Not surprisingly, the participation of Rac1 in neurite outgrowth, axon formation, elongation, branching, guidance and pathfinding has been under intense investigation [Hall and Lalli, 2010]. The study of Rac1 functions in nerve cells with DN or CA mutants is a clear example of how results derived from these approaches should be interpreted with caution [Kuhn et al., 1998]. The initial studies of Luo's laboratory established that DN DRac1 prevents axonal outgrowth; it was later shown that this phenotype was the consequence of a progressive inactivation of DRac1, DRac2 and the related protein Mtl. This phenomenon leads to dose-dependent cumulative phenotypes involving firstly defects in axonal branching, and then in guidance, and finally in outgrowth [Luo et al., 1994; Luo, 2000; Ng et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2007]. In agreement with this, loss of function mutations in Drac1, DRac2, and Mtl produced abnormalities in axonal growth and guidance; it was also demonstrated that the GEF Trio is essential for DRac functioning in axon growth and guidance [Hakeda-Susuki et al., 2002].
A role for Rac1 in neuritogenesis and axon outgrowth has also been demonstrated in mammalian neuronal cell lines or primary cultures. Thus, PC12 cell differentiation requires Rac1 activation, by a mechanism involving RhoA translocation from the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm and inactivation [Nusser et al., 2002]. Activation of Rac1 by ectopic expression of Tiam1 promotes growth cone lamellipodial expansion and neurite sprouting in neuroblastoma cells [van Leeuwen et al., 1997]. A similar mechanism may operate in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons; ectopic expression of Rac1 or Tiam1/2 enhances axonal elongation and also induces the extension of multiple Tau-1 + axon-like neurites [Kunda et al., 2001; Nishimura et al., 2005; Chuang et al., 2005]. Suppression of Tiam1 also prevents expansion of the growth cone lamellipodial veil and the increase in actin dynamics that marks the transformation of a minor process into an axon [Bradke and Dotti, 1999; Kunda et al., 2001]. Interestingly, Tiam1 interacts with MAP1B [Montenegro et al., 2010] in axonal growth cones and may serve to link microtubules with Rho-GTPase signaling and the actin cytoskeleton. Tctex-1, a dynein light chain also stimulates axonal outgrowth and elongation, by a Rac-dependent mechanism that involves inhibition of RhoA [Chuang et al., 2005; Conde et al., 2010].
Three studies have used a conditional-gene targeting approach to study the function of Rac1 in mammalian neurons. The first study used Foxg1-Cre mice to suppress Rac1 in the VZ of telencephalon and Dlx5/6-CRE-EGFP mice to eliminate Rac1 from the SVZ of the ventral telencephalon [Chen et al., 2007]. The results obtained showed that deletion of Rac1 in VZ progenitors did not prevent axonal outgrowth of telencephalic neurons. However, several major axonal tracts display desfasiculation or projection defects. These results were interpreted as indicative that Rac1 controls axon guidance rather than neuritogenesis [Chen et al., 2007]. Functional redundancy is one possibility for explaining why the absence of Rac1 does not affect axon outgrowth in the KO animals, and one likely candidate is Rac3. Thus, conditional deletion of Rac1 in neurons combined with KO of Rac3 impairs development of dentate granule cells altering mossy fiber formation, and therefore hippocampal circuitry; besides, lack of both genes causes behavioral and motor defects, as well as premature death of mice. This fundamental study provides a set of evidence showing that Rac1 and Rac3 act synergistically, with complementary functions [Corbetta et al., 2009]. This study also showed that single rac1 or rac3 deletions produce minor phenotypes. One possible explanation for these mild phenotypes is that the GTPase RhoG [Katoh and Neguishi, 2003] shares a high amino acid sequence homology (72%) with Rac1 and is also involved in neurite outgrowth, at least in PC12 cells [Katoh et al., 2000]; this protein may partially compensate for Rac1 and/or Rac3 functions in the nervous system. Other explanations are possible.
A third conditional KO deleting Rac1 in the whole brain has also been generated [Tahirovic et al., 2010]. These authors analyzed cerebellar granule cells, which are devoid of other Rac isoforms, and found that deletion of the rac1 gene impairs migration and axon formation. This study also showed absence of Wiscott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family velprolin homologous protein (WAVE) from the plasma membrane of Rac -/- granule cells; interestingly, the axon growth defect of these neurons could be partially rescued by expression of a WAVE mutant that targets to the plasma membrane. The results of this study suggest that regulation of axon growth by Rac1 isoforms may be neuron-type specific [Tahirovic et al. 2010].
The study by Corbetta et al.  also showed that spine development is strongly hampered in hippocampal neuronal cultures derived from the Rac1-/-/Rac3-/- mice [Corbetta et al., 2009]. These alterations may underlie the epileptic phenotype found in the Rac1/Rac3 double KO animals [Corbetta et al., 2009].
Rac Regulators and Effectors
One of the most important GEFs in the nervous system is the T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1 factor (Tiam1) [Habets et al., 1994; Mertens et al., 2003]. Translocation of Tiam1-family members to the plasma membrane is crucial for inducing Rac-mediated membrane ruffles and activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) [Michiels et al., 1997; Stam et al., 1997]. Pioneering work from Collard's laboratory with N1E-115 cells showed that Tiam1 induces cell spreading, expansion of the growth cone lamellipodial veil and increases neurite sprouting [van Leeuwen et al., 1997]. Tiam1 has a closely related member known as Tiam2 or STEF that also participates in NIE-115 differentiation [Matsuo et al., 2003]. Tiam1 colocalizes with actin filaments and a subset of tyrosinated microtubules present in axonal growth cones [Kunda et al., 2001]. MAP1B regulates microtubule tyrosination by interacting with the enzyme tubulin tyrosine ligase (TTL) [Utreras et al., 2008]. Tiam1/STEF suppression inhibits axon growth, while overexpression induces multiple axon formation [Kunda et al., 2001; Nishimura et al., 2005], a phenomenon that involves interaction with Par3 [Nishimura et al., 2005]. Recent observations have shown that Tiam1 interacts with MAP1B favoring its localization at the distal axonal end [Tortosa et al., 2010]. In non-neuronal cells, Tiam1-dependent Rac1 activation requires the participation of the Arp2/3 complex [Ten Klooster et al., 2006]. Although the significance of this interaction has not been explored in neurons, it is plausible that Tiam1-promoted axonal elongation could require the participation of the Arp2/3 complex.
Current evidence suggests that Tiam1/STEF activity could be down regulated by a signaling pathway involving RhoA-ROCK [Matsuo et al., 2003]. ROCK phosphorylates STEF at Thr1662 diminishing its ability to activate Rac, presumably by altering its interaction with MAP1B or other molecules [Takefuji et al., 2007]. For example, Par-3 interacts directly with Tiam1/STEF, which is then assembled into the polarity complex aPKC-PAR-6-Cdc42-GTP to drive Rac activation. It has been reported that RhoA-ROCK phosphorylates Par3, disrupting its interaction with Par6-aPKC and suppressing Par3-mediated Rac activation [Nakayama et al., 2005].
Trio is another GEF for Rac, which is highly expressed in the brain [Debant et al., 1996]. A special feature of Trio is the presence of two different DHPH domains. The first domain is involved in both Rac and RhoG activation, whereas the second stimulates RhoA [Bellanger et al., 1998]. Trio appears to be a key component of the intracellular signaling pathway that regulates axonal guidance and cell migration in the nervous system [Liebl et al., 2000], a process which appears to involve regulation of Filamin, an actin binding protein [Fox et al., 1998]. A role for Trio in neuronal morphogenesis is further supported by other observations. Solo/Trio8, a short membrane-associated isoform of Trio selectively expressed in Purkinje cells, regulates neurite morphology in primary cultured neurons by activating endosome recycling [Sun et al., 2006]. Other Trio isoforms containing a GEFD1 domain also modulate neurite growth [Portales-Casamar et al., 2006].
Kalirin family members are highly homologous to Trio. The DHPH1 domain of Kalirin is similar to the first DHPH domain of Trio, which activates Rac1 [Debant et al., 1996], whereas Kalirin DHPH2 is most similar to the second DHPH domain of Trio, and therefore it can also activate RhoA. A functional analysis of Kalirin DHPH domains in primary cultured cortical neurons showed that DHPH1 reduced axonal length [Penzes et al., 2001]. Interestingly, this GEF domain binds and activates more strongly RhoG than Rac1. Kalirin-9 and Kalirin-12 also promote axonal elongation in cultured rat superior cervical ganglion neurons, presumably by activating RhoG [May et al., 2002].
Vav family members (Vav1, Vav2, and Vav3) are prototypical Dbl GEFs for Rac and Cdc42 [Bustelo, 2000]. Vav1 is exclusively expressed in hematopoietic cells, while Vav2 and Vav3 are ubiquitously expressed [Katzav et al., 1989; Schuebel et al., 1996; Movilla and Bustelo, 1999]. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Vavs [Lopez-Lago et al., 2000] abrogates N-terminal auto inhibition leading to an open configuration with an exposed DH domain that triggers its GEF activity [Aghazadeh et al., 2000; Yu et al., 2010]. Expression of the three vav genes has been identified in some areas of the CNS [Movilla and Bustelo, 1999; Betz and Sandhof, 2003] and Vav proteins are implicated in axonal targeting/guidance in flies and mice [Cowan et al., 2005; Malartre et al., 2010]. ALS2/Alsin is a GEF that contains a central DH/PH domain responsible for Rac1 activation. It colocalizes with Rac at neuronal growth cones, and regulates neurite outgrowth and growth cone motility [Tudor et al., 2005]. The PAK-interacting exchange factor PIX, a GEF for Rac has an important role in regulating dendritic spine formation [Zhang et al., 2003].
Another protein that activates Rac is the Dock180-related GEF [Cote and Vuori, 2007]. Studies in mammalian cells have demonstrated that Dock180 is a GEF for Rac1 implicated in multiple activities ranging from cell migration to axonal outgrowth [Cote and Vuori, 2007]. Dock180 interacts with ELMO1, a highly evolutionarily conserved PH-domain containing protein. It has been proposed that the ELMO-PH domain interacts in trans with a Dock180:Rac1 complex, eliciting activation of the GTPase [Lu et al., 2004]. The C-terminal region of ELMO1 is necessary and sufficient to interact with Dock180, functioning as a bipartite GEF, promoting Rac GTP activation, membrane ruffling and spine morphogenesis [Miyamoto and Yamauchi, 2010].
Dock7 is an atypical GEF member of the Dock180 family that activates Rac and induces axon formation in primary culture neurons [Watabe-Uchida et al., 2006a,b]. Dock7-induced axonal growth involves phosphorylation and inactivation of the microtubule destabilizing protein stathmin/Op18 [Watabe-Uchida et al., 2006a,b; Conde and Caceres, 2009]. MOCA [modifier of cell adhesion) or Dock3 was described to be specifically present in neurons where it enhances Rac1 activity. Interestingly, MOCA farnesylation is required for its localization to the growth cone subcortical cytoskeleton and Rac activation [Namekata et al., 2004]. A recent study has shown that Dock3 acts downstream of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to promote axonal outgrowth. It is worth noting that Dock3 binds and inhibits GSK3-β, increasing the non-phosphorylated form of CRMP2, which stimulates microtubule assembly and axonal growth [Namekata et al., 2012].
GEFT is another GEF, which is enriched in both hippocampus and cerebellum [Bryan et al., 2004] and activates RhoA, Rac and Cdc42. However, in neuroblastoma and primary neurons, its function has been primarily linked with Rac1 activation, and the control of neurite and dendrite remodeling [Bryan et al., 2004, 2006; Mitchell et al., 2011]. GEFT-mediated activation of Rac1 has been associated with downstream regulation of PAK1 and PAK5 [Bryan et al., 2004, 2006].
Rac1 is also controlled by specific GAPs, such as α-chimaerins. They occur as α1 and α2 isoforms, the latter, an alternatively spliced isoform, contains an SH2 domain. These GAPs target primarily Rac1 activation and to a lesser extent Cdc42 [Hall et al., 1993b; Kozma et al., 1996]. The expression of α2-chimaerin mRNA is high in the developing nervous system, suggesting a role in neuronal differentiation [Lim et al., 1992; Hall et al., 2001]. α2-chimaerin promotes neuritogenesis in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cell lines, an effect that requires an intact SH2 domain [Hall et al., 2001] (Fig. 5). Another study has shown that ectopic expression of α1-chimaerin induces pruning of dendritic branches and spines [Buttery et al., 2006].
Rac regulates actin dynamics through two main downstream effector pathways, the p21-activated kinase (PAK) [Manser et al., 1994] and WAVE [Miki et al., 1998]. They induce changes in the actin cytoskeleton through the PAK-cofilin [Ng and Luo, 2004] and the WAVE-Arp2/3 pathways [Takenawa and Miki, 2001; Ng and Luo, 2004].
PAK1, is a serine/threonine kinase involved in axon development in flies and mammals [Hing et al., 1999; Jacobs et al., 2007]. It regulates actin dynamics by activating a LIMK-cofilin pathway implicated in neurite extension and growth cone motility [Endo et al., 2003; Rosso et al., 2004], linking the Rac-PAK module to the mechanisms controlling axonal guidance and branching.
The p35/Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) [Tsai, 2001] is also a Rac1 effector. p35, the neuron-specific regulator of Cdk5 associates with Rac in a GTP-dependent manner, hyperphosphorylating Pak1 and inhibiting its activity [Nikolic et al., 1998]. Since the Cdk5-RacGTP-Pak1 complex localizes in the growth cone periphery, it is likely to have an impact on the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton, thus promoting neuronal migration and neurite outgrowth [Paglini et al., 1998b; Tsai, 2001; Rashid et al., 2001]. Experiments with Rac1-deficient cerebellar granule neurons have shown that WAVE is absent from the plasma membrane; since loss of WAVE inhibits axon extension, these observations strongly support the view that the Rac1-WAVE pathway is necessary for axonal growth [Tahirovic et al., 2010].
The Cdc42 Family (Cdc42, Tc10, and TCL)
Cdc42 and the closer related members, teratocarcinoma 10 (TC10) and teratocarcinoma 10 like (TCL) [Drivas et al., 1990], share the ability to induce the formation of filopodia in cells [Neudauer et al., 1998; Vignal et al., 2000; Wennerberg and Der, 2004].
Current evidence favors the view that Cdc42 plays a central role in the establishment of cell polarity in a wide variety of cells, ranging from yeast to neurons [Etienne-Manneville, 2004]. In the case of nerve tissue, Cdc42-mediated polarization arises early in brain development. For example, the neuroepithelium (NE) has an apparent apical-basal polarity marked by the position of adherens junctions from neural progenitors facing the ventricular lumen (apical pole) and their ascending projections on radial glia towards the pial surface (basal pole). While the signaling pathways underlying NE polarization are poorly understood, it is known that Cdc42 plays a critical role [Chen et al., 2006]. Conditional deletion of Cdc42 abolishes the apical distribution of Par3, aPKC, E-cadherin, β-catenin, and Numbs. Additionally, Cdc42 deletion severely impairs the extension of nestin-positive radial glia. Interestingly, neural progenitors fail to anchor with the apical surface and become extensively intermingled with nascent neurons throughout the entire depth of the NE. Consequently, the Cdc42-deficient telencephalon fails to separate resulting in holoprosencephaly [Chen et al., 2006].
Cdc42 and the Par3-Par6-aPKC complex also have a role in neurite outgrowth and polarization in cultured hippocampal pyramidal cells [Wiggin et al., 2005; Arimura and Kaibuchi, 2007; Hall and Lalli, 2010]. Par3 and Par6 determine cell polarity in epithelial cells, and also in worms and flies. In cultured neuronal cells, the transformation of a minor neurite into an axon is preceded and accompanied by the translocation of Par3 and Par6 to the growth cone of the nascent axon [Shi et al., 2003]. Moreover, ectopic expression of Par3 or Par6 alters axon formation. These neurons fail to elaborate a single axon; instead they extend two or more axon-like neurites. It was also shown that the correct localization of Par3-Par6 and aPKC to the tip of the future axon is triggered by activation of a signaling pathway involving a receptor tyrosine kinase and phosphatidyl-inositol 3 kinase (PI3K) [Shi et al. 2003, 2004; Menager et al., 2004]. A molecular mechanism linking Cdc42 and the polarity complex is dependent on the GTP-Cdc42 interaction with the Par3/Par 6 complex [Nishimura et al., 2005]. Interestingly, a fast cycling mutant of Cdc42 mimics Par3 ovexpression inducing the extension of multiple axon-like Tau-1 + axon-like neurites [Sosa et al., 2006]; on the other hand, RNAi suppression of Cdc42 prevents axon formation [Schwamborn and Puschel, 2004]. Besides, IGF-1 a trophic factor required for axon formation in cultured hippocampal pyramidal [Sosa et al., 2006] and cortical motor projection neurons [Ozdinler and Macklis, 2006] acts through a signaling pathway involving a tyrosine kinase receptor (β-gc, a growth cone-enriched variant of the IGF1 receptor [IGF1R]; [Mascotti et al., 1997], PI3K and Cdc42 [Sosa et al., 2006]). The PI3K-Cdc42-Par3-Par6 signaling module is reinforced by the action of Tiam1/Tiam2, by direct interaction with Par3-Par6-aPKC and GTP-bound Cdc42 that leads to Rac activation [Nishimura et al., 2005]. Since Rac-GTP also activates PI3K [Tolias et al., 1995; Conde et al., 2010], a positive feedback loop is generated that drives the continued activation of PI3K and targeting of the polarity complex to the axonal growth cone. Major downstream effectors of this regulatory system are components of the microtubule cytoskeleton required for growth cone protrusion, engorgement and advance during the formation of a new axonal segment [Conde and Caceres, 2009]. Proper regulation of microtubule organization and dynamics could provide an additional positive feedback loop to further ensure Rac-Cdc42 activities [Waterman-Storer et al., 1999; Gonzalez-Billault et al., 2001; Montenegro et al., 2010].
On the other hand, the Cc42-Tiam-Par3-Par6-aPKC-Rac module could be a major target for a RhoA-ROCK inhibitory signaling pathway during axon formation; thus, ROCK phosphorylates and inhibits Tiam1/Tiam2 and Par3 disrupting the polarity complex and preventing Rac activation [Nakayama et al 2008; Caceres et al., 2010]. A genetic knock-out strategy used to ablate Cdc42 in mouse brain also revealed that loss of Cdc42 strongly suppressed axon formation in vivo and in culture and that cofilin is an important downstream effector in this process [Garvalov et al., 2007].
Studies in the Drosophila nervous system showed that Cdc42 is implicated in multiple aspects of dendritic morphogenesis [Scott et al., 2003]. The results of this work revealed that despite having a grossly normal dendritic arbor, Cdc42 mutant MB neurons display a number of key alterations in dendritic morphology, including 1) loss of proximo-distal dendritic tapering, 2) loss of stereotyped branching and 3) a drastic (50%) reduction in spine number.
A more recent study examined Cdc42 activity in single dendritic spines during LTP using two-photon fluorescence lifetime imaging (2pFLIM) [Murakoshi et al., 2011]. The results of this very innovative and fascinating study revealed that when spine volume increases, activated Cdc42 remains within the stimulated spine, while RhoA diffuses out of the spine into the shaft; interestingly, inhibition of the Rho-ROCK pathway preferentially inhibited initial spine growth, whereas inhibition of the Cdc42-PAK pathway blocked the maintenance of sustained structural plasticity [Murakoshi et al., 2011]. It is worth noting that PAK3, implicated in mental retardation, regulates spine morphogenesis through a Cdc42-dependent pathway [Kreis et al., 2007].
Another Cdc42-related GTPase involved in neuronal morphogenesis is TC10. For example, it was shown that TC10 induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 and N1E-115 cells [Abe et al., 2003], as well as in cultured dorsal root ganglia [Tanabe et al., 2000]. However, another study failed to demonstrate the participation of TC10 in NGF-induced neurite formation [Murphy et al., 1999, 2001]. Axonal elongation, a hallmark of neuronal polarization, requires membrane addition (exocytosis of plasma precursor vesicles or PPVs) at sites of active growth, such as the axonal growth cone [Pfenninger, 2009; Ory and Gasman, 2011]. This phenomenon has to be tightly coupled with cytoskeletal assembly to ensure neurite extension. In a recent study, Dupraz and colleagues showed that a signaling cascade involving IGF1-R (βgc) and PI3K activate TC10 to regulate membrane addition during axon formation. Activated TC10 triggers translocation of the exocyst component exo70 to the plasma membrane in the distal axon and growth cone. Moreover, silencing of either TC10 or exo70 inhibits axon formation by hindering the insertion of the β-gc subunit of IGF1R [Sosa et al., 2006; Dupraz et al., 2009]. Thus, by activating two highly related RhoGTPases, namely Cdc42 and TC10, PI3K controls two critical events underlying axon growth, namely cytoskeletal assembly and membrane addition.
Cdc42 Regulators and Effectors
One important set of factors for regulating Cdc42 are RhoGDIs. RhoGDIα, which is ubiquitously expressed and strongly interacts with Cdc42 [Zalcman et al., 1996] induces relocalization of Cdc42 to the cytoplasm and nucleoplasm, an effect which is not found with TC10 [Murphy et al., 2001]. Post-translational modifications can alter RhoGDIα functions, since phosphorylation at Ser34 might interfere with the hydrophobic interaction between Cdc42 and RhoGDI [Hoffman et al., 2000; Shin et al., 2009]. Suppression of RhoGDIγ, stimulates differentiation of neural stem cells [Lu et al., 2008]. It will be now of considerable interest to address the role of different RhoGDI-Cdc42 complexes in regulating the spatio-temporal activation of Cdc42, and their significance for axon specification, elongation and guidance.
Cdc42 and Rac share several regulators. Thus, some members of the Dock6 family activate Rac1 or Cdc42 through the catalytic Dock Homology Region-2 (DHR-2) and induce actin-based morphological changes both in vitro and in vivo [Miyamoto et al., 2007]. The expression of Dock6 increases during differentiation of NIE-115 cells, whereas Dock6 suppression inhibits neurite outgrowth [Miyamoto et al., 2007]. Vav proteins can also promote Cdc42 activity. In NGF-treated PC12 cells, Cdc42 and Rac1 are activated mainly through a signaling pathway involving Vav2/3 and PI3K [Aoki et al., 2005]. The transmembrane protein CD47 also regulates Cdc42 during neurite extension and filopodial formation in N1E-115 cells [Miyashita, et al., 2004] by a mechanism that involves Src kinase-mediated phosphorylation of Vav2 [Murata et al., 2006]. A specific GEF for Cdc42 is the protein hPEM-2. Functional assays with this protein suggest that it is necessary for filopodia formation and actin remodeling in non-neuronal cells. While little is known about its function in nerve cells, it is worth noting that it is highly enriched in rodent brain [Reid et al., 1999]. A recent high throughput analysis performed to uncover global proteomic changes occurring during N1E-115 differentiation revealed a Rac-Cdc42 compartmentalized signaling network that operates in conjunction with multiple GEFs and GAPs to control neurite outgrowth. In this study, RNAi experiments implicated the Cdc42-specifc GEF Dock10 and Cdc42 GAP ArhGAP17 in neurite extension [Pertz et al., 2008].
Another interesting specific regulator of Cdc42 is NOMA-GAP, which belongs to a new family of multi adaptor proteins with RhoGAP activity. This GAP is essential for NGF-stimulated neuronal differentiation and for regulation of the ERK5 MAP kinase and the Cdc42 signaling pathways [Rosario et al., 2007]. RICS and PX-RICS are splicing variants of a Cdc42 GAP which is highly enriched in brain. RICS was shown to be important for neurite extension [Nasu-Nishimura et al., 2006] and recycling of NMDA receptors [Okabe et al., 2003]. Mice lacking RICS showed increased Cdc42 activity in both hippocampal and granule cerebellar neurons [Nasu-Nishimura et al., 2006]. PX-RICS, a splicing variant with lower GAP activity, is the predominant isoform found during nervous system development and it has been proposed that PX-RICS controls protein trafficking to the plasma membrane [Hayashi et al., 2007; Nakamura et al., 2008] (Fig. 6).
Cdc42 also shares with Rac1 some effector proteins, such as PAKs. In this regard, it is interesting to note that PAK3 appears to be preferentially activated by Cdc42. Cdc42-dependent-PAK3 activation had been proposed to modulate dendritic spine formation and synaptic plasticity [Kreis et al., 2007]. Importantly, PAK3 is another GTPase effector linked to mental retardation disorders, due to either loss of PAK3 protein or loss of its kinase activity [Allen et al., 1998].
Antagonistic Influences of RhoA vs. Rac/Cdc42 During Migration and Neuronal Polarity
As described in previous sections, it is now quite evident that RhoA, Rac and Cdc42 family members actively participate in several events during the neuronal morphogenetic program. One conclusion of many studies is that RhoA acts as an inhibitory regulator, as opposed to Rac and Cdc42 that serve as positive ones. However, this general idea could be misleading and is challenged by several experimental observations.
One example is cell migration, where the current view indicates that Rac regulates protrusion at the leading edge and Rho mediates actin-based contractility at the trailing side. However, studies using wounded fibroblast monolayers or LPA-stimulated serum starved fibroblasts have shown that microtubule reorientation and stabilization at the leading edge, required for direct cell migration, are dependent on a RhoA-mDia signaling pathway [Cook et al., 1998; Palazzo et al., 2001; Gundersen, 2002, 2008; Wen et al., 2004]. The development of biosensors to monitor the spatio temporal activation of RhoGTPases has also revealed a more complex picture of the relationship between RhoA and Rac-Cdc42 during cell migration [Pertz, 2010]. Using FRET probes that report RhoA activity, two studies demonstrated that the bulk of RhoA activation occurs at the leading edge of migrating cells [Pertz et al., 2006; Machacek et al., 2009]. When used in combination with multiplexing techniques and biosensors for RhoA, Rac and Cdc42, this approach allowed measurements of the time and location of RhoGTPase activation during cell migration [Machacek et al., 2009]. The striking results of this study showed that RhoA activation occurs directly in the leading edge at the onset of protrusion, while Rac and Cdc42 are switched on later and remain active during retraction. It is likely that this behavior will apply to other RhoGTPases, and/or cellular events and/or contexts [Pertz, 2010].
With the exception of Murakoshi and colleagues [Murakoshi et al., 2011] that used 2p-FLIM to analyze the spatio temporal kinetics of Cdc42 and RhoA activation during synaptic plasticity, no experimental data is available about the spatio temporal patterns of Rho-GTPase activation during neuronal polarization. However, it is likely that this phenomenon is more complicated than currently envisioned and that the cellular context is a major factor to consider. For example, in cerebellar granule cells, a neuronal cytokine designated as Stromal-cell derived factor 1α (SDF1α) is a physiological ligand that can promote axonal elongation by a RhoA-mDia signaling pathway; interestingly, a high dose of SDF-1α produces axon retraction by a pathway involving RhoA-ROCK [Arakawa et al., 2003]. A recent study by Dotti and colleagues [Pollarolo et al., 2011] has followed the time course of appearance of a neuron's first neurite, an early polarization event that ultimately defines the growth axis. The results of this study suggest that the asymmetrical distribution of RhoA and Aurora kinase could be linked to the generation of the cleavage plane during the last mitotic division, which ultimately determines the site for the emergence of the axon.
RhoGTPase activity needs to be precisely controlled to ensure proper functioning among different cell types and intracellular compartments. In fact, there is a large group of accessory proteins which form a delicate and exquisite regulatory system to dynamically control the function of RhoGTPase family members.
Conclusions and Perspectives
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
Morphological changes occurring during neuronal differentiation are supported by dynamic changes of the cytoskeleton. Small Rho GTPases cycle between active and inactive states which are mutually exclusive. This property allows a local and fine regulation of their cellular functions. After activation, Rho GTPases control several neuronal morphogenetic and polarization events, including cell division, migration, neurite sprouting, axon outgrowth and elongation, as well as regeneration and synaptic plasticity. Although it has been proposed that there are mutually exclusive and opposite roles for Rho and Rac/Cdc42 family members, this vision has started to change with the development of biosensors to monitor spatio/temporal changes in GTPase activity. Evidence derived from the use of FRET-based biosensors suggests that there is a coordinated fine-tuning of Rho GTPase activity that must be locally regulated with great precision. The mechanisms that control the activation of GTPases are based on protein-protein interactions involving positive and negative regulators. Some of them may serve not only to control GTPase functions, but also to allow interactions with other sub-cellular compartments, such as the microtubule lattice, the plasma membrane and organelles of the secretory and endocytic pathways. It is likely that new regulators will be discovered and characterized in the immediate future. We envision an exciting field for cell/molecular biology studies, which would consider: a) local and temporal changes of Rho GTPases, most likely defining sub-cellular domains; b) concurrent changes of GTPase regulators by signaling cascades; c) concurrent mechanisms controlling the activity of Rho GTPase effectors; and d) the integration of multiple extracellular cues into discrete signaling pathways affecting the function of Rho GTPases. Most of these questions will serve to understand the physiological roles of Rho GTPases in different cellular contexts and events, opening the possibility to address their contribution to pathological conditions due to loss- or gain-of-function.
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
This work was supported by FONDECYT 1095089 and ICM P05-001-F to CGB.
DH is supported by the Millennium Scientific Initiative and PM-Ll is a doctoral fellow from CONICYT (Chile). AC and CC are staff scientists from CONICET (Argentina); their work is supported by grants from ANPCyT and Agencia Cordoba Ciencia. JW is a doctoral fellow from CONICET. AC dedicates this article to the memory of Dr. Eli Jares-Erijman. We thank Michael Handford (Universidad de Chile) for proof-reading the manuscript.
- Top of page
- Regulators of Rho GTPases
- Conclusions and Perspectives
- 2003. Small GTPase Tc10 and its homologue RhoT induce N-WASP-mediated long process formation and neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci 116: 155–168. , , , , and .
- 1992. Intracellular localization of the P21rho proteins. J Cell Biol 119: 617–627. , , .
- 1997. RhoGDIγ: a GDP-dissociation inhibitor for Rho proteins with preferential expression in brain and pancreas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 4279–84. , , , , , , , .
- 2000. Structural basis for relief of autoinhibition of the Dbl homology domain. Cell 102: 625–633. , , , .
- 2001. Phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase is necessary for semaphorin 3A-induced growth cone collapse. Nat Neurosci 4: 367–373. , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1998. Overexpression of a neural-specific rho family GTPase, cRac1B, selectively induces enhanced neuritogenesis and neurite branching in primary neurons. J Cell Biol 142: 815–825. , , ,
- 1998. PAK3 mutation in nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation. Nature Gen. 20: 25–30. , , , , , , , .
- 2005. Local phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation recruits Vav2 and Vav3 to activate Rac1/Cdc42 and initiate neurite outgrowth in nerve growth factor-stimulated PC12 cells. Mol Biol Cell 16: 2207–2217. , , , .
- 2003. Control of axon elongation via an SDF-1α/Rho/mDia pathway in cultured cerebellar granule neurons. J Cell Biol 161: 381–391. , , , , , , , , .
- 2007. Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 8: 194–205. ,
- 1999. Proteins of the ADF/Cofilin family: essential regulators of actin dynamics. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 185–230. .
- 2009. Establishment of axon-dendritic polarity in developing neurons. Ann Rev Neurosci 32: 347–381. , .
- 2003. Loss of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate binding by the C-terminal Tiam-1 pleckstrin homology domain prevents in vivo Rac1 activation without affecting membrane targeting. J Biol Chem 278: 11457–11464. , , , , , .
- 1998. The two guanine nucleotide exchange factor domains of Trio link the Rac1 and the RhoA pathways in vivo. Oncogene 16: 147–152. , , .
- 2003. Oligophrenin-1 (OPH1) gene mutation causes syndromic X-linked mental rerardation with epilepsy, rostral ventricular enlargement and cerebellar hypoplasia. Brain 126: 1537–1544. , , , , , , , .
- 2003. GAPs galore! A survey of putative Ras superfamily GTPase activating proteins in man and Drosophila. Biochim Biophys Acta 1603: 47–82.
- 2010. ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol 20: 187–195. , .
- 2008. Characterization of RhoBTB-dependent Cul3 ubiquitin ligase complexes-evidence for an autoregulatory mechanism. Exp Cell Res 314: 3453–3465. , , , , , , .
- 2003. Detection and identification of Vav1 protein in primary cultured murine cerebellar neurons and in neuroblastoma cells (SH-SY5Y and Neuro-2a). Neurosci Lett 339: 37–40. , .
- 2007. Protein kinase Czeta and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta control neuronal polarity in developing rodent enteric neurons, whereas SMAD-specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 promotes neurite growth but does not influence polarity. J Neurosci 27: 9458–9468. , , , .
- 1997. Mapping of the X-breakpoint involved in balanced X; 12 translocation in a female with mild mental retardation. Eur J Hum Genet 5: 105–109. , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2008. Cellular functions of GEF-H1, a microtubule-regulated Rho-GEF: is altered GEF-H1 activity a crucial determinant of disease pathogenesis? Trends Cell Biol 18: 210–219. , , , .
- 2003. Differential distribution of Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in the developing mouse brain: implications for a role of Rac3 in Purkinje cell differentiation. Eur J Neurosci 18: 2417–2424. , , ,
- 1999. The role of local actin instability in axon formation. Science 283: 1931–1944. , .
- 2004. GEFT, a Rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor, regulates neurite outgrowth and dendritic spine formation. J Biol Chem 279: 45824–45832. , , , , , .
- 2006. The Rho-family guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEFT enhances retinoic acid- and cAMP-induced neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci Res 83: 1151–1159. , , .
- 2008. Myosin II activity facilitates microtubule bundling in the neuronal growth cone neck. Dev Cell 15: 163–169. , , , , , .
- 2000. Regulatory and signaling properties of the Vav family. Mol Cell Biol 20: 1461–1477. .
- 2006. The diacylglycerol-binding protein α1-chimaerin regulates dendritic morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 1924–1929. , , , , , .
- 2006. The Rho-GTPase cdc42 regulates neural progenitor fate at the apical surface. Nat Neurosci 9: 1099–1107. , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2006. Cdc42 causes Sonic hedgehog-independent holoprosencephaly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 16520–16525. , , , , , , .
- 2007. Rac controls the formation of midline commissures and the competency of tangential migration in ventral telencephalic neurons. J Neurosci 27: 3884–3893. , , , , , , , .
- 1997. “The role of the PH domain in the signal-dependent membrane targeting of Sos. EMBO J 16: 1351–1359. , , .
- 2005. The dynein light chain Tctex-1 has a dynein-independent role in actin remodeling during neurite outgrowth. Dev Cell 9: 75–86. , , , , , , .
- 2001. Dendritic arbor development and synaptogenesis. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11: 118–126. .
- 2001. Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nat Cell Biol 3: 339–345. , , , , , .
- 2002. Rho GTPase signalling pathways in the morphological changes associated with apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 9: 493–504. , .
- 2009. Microtubule dynamics in axons, dendrites and at the synapse. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 319–332. , .
- 2010. Evidence for the involvement of Lfc and Tctex-1 in axon formation. J Neurosci 30: 6793–6800. , , , , , , , , .
- 1998. Rho guanosine triphosphatases mediate the selective stabilization of microtubules induced by lysophosphatici acid. J Cell Biol 141: 175–185. , , .
- 2005. Generation and characterization of Rac3 knockout animals. Mol Cell Biol 25: 5763–5776. , , , , , , .
- 2009. Essential role of Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in neuronal development. FASEB J 23: 1347–1357. , , , , , , .
- 2007. GEF what? Dock180 and related proteins help Rac to polarize cells in new ways. Trends Cell Biol 17: 383–393. , .
- 2005. Vav family GEFs link activated Ephs to endocytosis and axon guidance. Neuron 46: 205–217. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2009. Bric-a-brac at the Golgi. Dev Cell 16: 775–776. , .
- 2002. Breaking the neuronal sphere: regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in neuritogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 694–704. , .
- 2003. RhoA/ROCK regulation of neuritogenesis via profilin IIa-mediated control of actin stability. J Cell Biol 162: 1267–1279. , , , , , .
- 2008. Functions of Rac GTPases during neuronal development. Dev Neurosci 30: 47–58. .
- 2011. Transcriptional regulation of neuronal polarity and morphogenesis in brain development. Neuron 72: 22–40. , .
- 1996. The multidomain protein Trio binds the LAR transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase, contains a protein kinase domain, and has separate rac-specific and rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 5466–5471. , , , , , .
- 1989. Rac, a novel ras-related family of proteins that are botulinum toxin substrates. J Biol Chem 264: 16378–16382. , , , , .
- 2005. RhoGDI: multiple functions in the regulation of Rho family GTPase activities. Biochem J 390: 1–9. , .
- 1990. Characterization of four novel ras-like genes expressed in a human teratocarcinoma cell line. Mol Cell Biol 4: 793–798. , , , , .
- 2009. The TC10-exo70 complex is essential for membrane expansion and axonal specification in developing neurons. J Neurosci 29: 13292–13301. , , , , , , , .
- 2005. Uncoupling of inhibitory and shuttling functions of rho GDP dissociation inhibitors. J Biol Chem 280: 4674–4683. , , , .
- 2009. The TC10-exo70 complex is essential for membrane expansion and axonal specification in developing neurons. J Neurosci 29: 13292–13301. , , , , , , , .
- 2003. Control of growth cone motility and morphology by LIM kinase and Slingshot via phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of cofilin. J Neurosci 23: 2527–2537. , , , , , , .
- 2009. Rho BTB3:A RhoGTPase required for endosome to Golgi transport. Cell 137: 938–948. , , , .
- 2004. Cdc42: the centre of polarity. J Cell Sci 117: 1291–1300. .
- 2002. RhoGTPases in cell biology. Nature 420: 629–634. , .
- 2010. The role of C. elegans Ena/VASP homolog UNC-34 in neuronal polarity and motility. Dev Biol 344: 94–106. , , , , , .
- 2000. RhoGTPases and growth cone collapse. Meth Enzymol 325: 473–482. , , .
- 1998. Mutations in filamin 1 prevent migration of cerebral cortical neurons in human periventricular heterotopia. Neuron 21: 1315–1325. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 1998. Different regions of Rho determine Rho-selective binding of different classes of Rho target molecules. J Biol Chem 27330: 18943–18949. , , , , , , , .
- 2011. The ‘invisible hand’: regulation of RHO GTPases by RHO GDIs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 493–504. , , .
- 1989. Identification of distinct cytoplasmic targets for ras/R-ras and rho regulatory proteins. J Biol Chem 264: 10–13. , , , .
- 2007. Cdc42 regulates cofilin during the establishment of neuronal polarity. J Neurosci 27: 13117–13129. , , , , , , .
- 2009. Lfc and Tctex-1 regulate the genesis of neurons from cortical precursor cells. Nat Neurosci 12: 735–744. , , , , , .
- 2001. Evidence for the role of MAP1B in axon formation. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2087–2098. , , .
- 2004. The X-linked mental retardation protein oligophrenin-1 is required for dendritic spine morphogenesis. Nat Neurosci 7: 364–372. , , , , , .
- 2005. The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Gene Dev 19: 1–49. , , .
- 2003. A role for VASP in RhoA-Diaphanous signalling to actin dynamics and SRF activity. EMBO J 22: 3050–3061. , , , , .
- 2008. A negative modulatory role for Rho and rho-associated kinase in delamination of neural crest cell. Neural Dev 3: 27–49. , , .
- 2002. Evolutionary conservation of microtubule-capture mechanisms, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 296–304. .
- 2008. Beyond polymer polarity; how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 860–873. .
- 1997. Characterization of RAC3, a novel member of the Rho family. J Biol Chem 272: 20384–20388. , , .
- 1994. Identification of an invasion-inducing gene, Tiam-1, that encodes a protein with homology to GDP-GTP exchangers for Rho-like proteins. Cell 77: 537–549. , , , , , .
- 2002. Rac function and regulation during Drosophila development. Nature 426: 438–440. , , , , , , , , .
- 2007. Rac1 and Rac3 have opposing functions in cell adhesion and differentiation of neuronal cells. J Cell Sci 120: 550–566. , , , , .
- 2009. Rac3 inhibits adhesion and differentiation of neuronal cells by modifying GIT1 downstream signaling. J Cell Sci 122: 2127–2136. , , , .
- 2005. Rho C is dispensable for embryognesis and tumor initiation but essential for metastasis. Genes Dev 19: 1974–1979. , , , , , , .
- 2003. Structural basis of the Rho GTPase signaling. J Biochem 134: 327–331. , , .
- 1998. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279: 509–514. .
- 2005. Rho GTPases and the control of cell behaviour. Biochem Soc Trans 33: 891–895. .
- 2010. Rho and Ras GTPases in axon growth, guidance, and branching. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a001818. , .
- 2000. Rho GTPases: molecular switches that control the organization and dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 965–970. , .
- 2001. alpha2-chimaerin, a Cdc42/Rac1 regulator, is selectively expressed in the rat embryonic nervous system and is involved in neuritogenesis in N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells. J Neurosci 21: 5191–5202. , , , , , , .
- 1993a. Cellular responses regulated by rho-related small GTP-binding proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340: 267–271. , , , .
- 1993b. Alpha 2-chimerin, an SH2-containing GTPase-activating protein for the ras-related protein p21rac derived by alternate splicing of the human n-chimerin gene, is selectively expressed in brain regions and testes. Mol Cell Biol 13: 4986–4998. , , , , , , , , .
- 1991. Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange on the CDC42Hs protein by the dbl oncogene product. Nature 354: 311–314. , , , , .
- 2007. PX-RICS, a novel splicing variant of RICS, is a main isoform expressed during neural development. Gene to Cells 12: 929–939. , , , , , , , .
- 2008. Neurogenin 2 controls cortical neuron migration through regulation of Rnd2. Nature 455: 114–118. , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1999. Pak functions downstream of Dock to regulate photoreceptor axon guidance in Drosophila. Cell 97: 853–863. , , , , .
- 2000. Structure of the Rho family GTP-binding protein Cdc42 in complex with the multifunctional regulator RhoGDI. Cell 100: 345–356. , , .
- 2009. Control of neuronal polarity and plasticity-a renassaince for microtubules. Trend Cell Biol 18: 669–672. , .
- 2009. Defining mechanisms of actin polymerization and depolymerization during dendritic spine morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 185: 323–339. , , , , , , .
- 2011. Structural Model for p75(NTR)-TrkA Intracellular Domain Interaction: A Combined FRET and Bioinformatics Study. J Mol Biol 414: 681–698. , , , , , , .
- 2007. Localized activation of p21-activated kinase controls neuronal polarity and morphology. J Neurosci 27: 8604–8615. , , , , , , .
- 2005. Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Ann Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 247–269. , .
- 1993. Lysophosphatidic acid induces neuronal shape changes via a novel, receptor-mediated signaling pathway: similarity to thrombin action. Cell Growth Differ 4: 247–255. , , , and .
- 1994. Inhibition of lysophosphatidate- and thrombin-induced neurite retraction and neuronal cell rounding by ADP ribosylation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho. J Cell Biol 126: 801–810. , , , , , .
- 2003. The control of dendritic development. Neuron 40: 229–242. , .
- 2010. Branching out: mechanisms of dendritic arborization. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 316–328. , .
- 2010. p190RhoGAP and Rap-dependent RhoGAP (ARAP3) inactivate RhoA in response to nerve growth factor leading to neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells. Exp Mol Med 42: 335–344. , , , , , .
- 2010. Neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells by basic fibroblast growth factor (βFGF) is mediated by RhoA inactivation through p190RhoGAP and ARAP3. J Cell Physiol 224: 786–794. , , , , , , , , .
- 2012. Control of neurite outgrowth by RhoA inactivation. J Neurochem 120:684–698. , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2010. Clostridium Botulinum toxin C3 exoenzyme: Rho inactivating tool in cell biology and a neurotrophic agent. The Open Toxicol J 3: 19–23. , , .
- 1999. Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem 68: 459–486. , , .
- 2009. AMPA receptor and GEF-H1/ Lfc regulates dendritic spine development through RhoA signaling cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 3549–3554. , , .
- 2003. RhoG activates Rac1 by direct interaction with the Dock180-binding protein Elmo. Nature 424: 461–464. , .
- 2000. Small GTPase RhoG is a key regulator for neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7378–7387. , , , , , , .
- 2003. The in vivo roles of STEF/Tiam1, Rac1 and JNK in cortical neuronal migration. EMBO J 22: 4190–4201. , , , .
- 2003. ROCK: Multifunction kinases in cell behavior. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 446–456. , .
- 2006. New directions in nerve regeneration. Exp Op Biol Ther 6: 735–738. , , .
- 2011. The RhoG/ELMO1/Dock180 Signaling Module Is Required for Spine Morphogenesis in Hippocampal Neurons. J Biol Chem 286: 37615–3624. , , , , .
- 2004. Wnt-3a and Dvl induce neurite retraction by activating Rho-associated kinase. Mol Cell Biol 24: 4487–4501. , , .
- 1999. Signaling to Rho GTPases. Exp Cell Res 253: 166–179. , .
- 1996. The GTPase-activating protein n-chimaerin cooperates with Rac1 and Cdc42Hs to induce the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia. Mol Cell Biol 16: 5069–5080. , , , .
- 1997. Rho family GTPases and neuronal growth cone remodeling: relationship between increased complexity induced by Cdc42Hs, Rac1, and acetylcholine and collapse induced by RhoA and lysophosphatidic acid. Mol Cell Biol 17: 1201–1211. , , , .
- 1999. Activation of RhoA by Lysophosphatidic Acid and Gα12/13 Subunits in Neuronal Cells: Induction of Neurite Retraction. Mol Biol Cell 10: 1851–1857. , , , , , .
- 2007. The p21-activated kinase 3 implicated in mental retardation regulates spine morphogenesis through a Cdc42-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 282: 21497–21506. , , , , , .
- 1998. Rac1-dependent actin filament organization in growth cones is necessary for beta1-integrin-mediated advance but not for growth on poly-D-lysine. J Neurobiol 37: 524–540. , , .
- 2001. Evidence for the involvement of Tiam1 in axon formation. J Neurosci 21: 2361–2372. , , , , .
- 2002. Characterization of the expression of PDZ-RhoGEF, LARG and G(alpha)12/G(alpha)13 proteins in the murine nervous system. Eur J Neurosci 16: 2333–2341. , , , , .
- 2008. MAP1A light chain-2 interacts with GTP-RhoB to control epidermal growth factor (EGF)-dependent EGF receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 283: 4155–4164. , , , , , , , , .
- 2002. Fear memory formation involves p190 RhoGAP and ROCK proteins through a GRB2-mediated complex. Neuron 36: 727–738. , , .
- 2000. Essential roles of Drosophila RhoA in the regulation of neuroblast proliferation and dendritic but not axonal morphogenesis. Neuron 25: 307–316. , , , , .
- 2010. The RhoGTPase Rac1 is required for proliferation and survival of progenitors in the developing forebrain. Dev Neurobiol 70: 659–678. , , , .
- 2008. Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 860–873. , .
- 2010. The transcription factor Cux1 regulates dendritic morphology of cortical pyramidal neurons. PLoS One 5: e10596. , , , .
- 2000. Rho GTPases regulate distinct aspects of dendritic arbor growth in Xenopus central neurons in vivo. Nat Neurosci 3: 217–225. , , .
- 2000. Dosage-sensitive, reciprocal genetic interactions between the Abl tyrosine kinase and the putative GEF trio reveal trio's role in axon pathfinding. Neuron 26: 107–118. , , , , , , , , .
- 1992. Developmental regulation and neuronal expression of the mRNA of rat n-chimaerin, a p21rac GAP: cDNA sequence. Biochem J 287: 415–422. , , , .
- 2011. Rnd-ing with RhoA activity to link neurogenesis with steps in neuronal migration. Dev Cell 20: 408–410. , .
- 2011. PDZ-RhoGEF ubiquitination by Cullin3-KLHL20 controls neurotrophin-induced neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol 193: 985–994. , , , , .
- 2006. Interaction of PDZRhoGEF with microtubule-associated protein 1 light chains: link between microtubules, actin cytoskeleton, neuronal polarity. J Biol Chem 28: 12030–12040. , , , .
- 2000. Tyrosine phosphorylation mediates both activacion and down modulation of the biological activity of Vav. Mol Cel Biol 20: 1678–1691. , , , , .
- 2009. The trip to the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 332–343. , .
- 2004. PH domain of ELMO functions in trans to regulate Rac activation via Dock180. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 756–762. , , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2008. Downregulation of Rho-GDI γ promotes differentiation of neural stem cells. Mol Cell Biochem 311: 233–240. , , .
- 1994. Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: Drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev 8: 1787–1802. , , , .
- 1997. “Rho family GTP-binding proteins in growth cone signalling. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 81–86. , , .
- 2000. Rho GTPases in neuronal morphogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 1: 173–180. .
- 2010. A role for RhoB in synaptic plasticity and the regulation of neuronal morphology. J Neurosci 30: 3508–3517. , , .
- 2009. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusión. Nature 461: 99–103. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2010. The guanine exchange factor vav controls axon growth and guidance during Drosophila development. J Neurosci 30: 2257–2267. , , , .
- 1997. Differential expression of distinct members of Rho family GTP-binding proteins during neuronal development: identification of Rac1B, a new neural-specific member of the family. J Neurosci 17: 6717–6728. , , , , .
- 1994. A brain serine/threonine protein kinase activated by Cdc42 and Rac1. Nature 367: 40–46. , , , , .
- 1997. Expression and distribution of IGF-1 receptors containing a β-subunit variant (β-gc) in developing neurons. J Neurosci 15: 1447–1459. , , , .
- 2003. Roles of STEF/Tiam1, guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rac1, in regulation of growth cone morphology. Mol Cell Neurosci 24: 69–81. , , , .
- 2002. Kalirin Dbl-homology guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1 domain initiates new axon outgrowths via RhoG-mediated mechanisms. J Neurosci 22: 6980–6990. , , , .
- 2009. Modulation of Rho guanine exchange factor Lfc activity by protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5963–5973. , , , , , , .
- 2005. CZH proteins: a new family of Rho-GEFs. J Cell Sci 118: 4937–4946. ,
- 2004. PIP3 is involved in neuronal polarization and axon formation. J Neurochem 89: 109–118. , , ,
- 2003. Regulation of Tiam1-Rac signalling. FEBS Letters 546: 11–16. , , .
- 2001. Differential localization of Rho GTPases in live cells: regulation by hypervariable regions and RhoGDI binding. J Cell Biol 152: 111–126. , , , , , .
- 1997. Regulated membrane localization of Tiam1, mediated by the NH2-terminal pleckstrin homology domain, is required for Rac-dependent membrane ruffling and C-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase activation. J Cell Biol 137: 387–398. , , , , , .
- 1998. WAVE, a novel WASP-family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac. EMBO J 17: 6932–6941. , , .
- 2011. GEFT, a Rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor, regulates lens differentiation through a Razc1-mediated mechanism. Curr Mol Med 11: 465–480. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2007. Dock6, a Dock-C subfamily guanine nucleotide exchanger, has the dual specificity for Rac1 and Cdc42 and regulates neurite outgrowth. Exp Cell Res 313: 791–804. , , , .
- 2010. Cellular signalling of Dock family proteins in neural functions Cell Signal 22: 175–182. , .
- 2004. Promotion of neurite and filopodium formation by CD47:roles of integrins, Rac, Cdc42. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3950–3963. , , , , , , , .
- 2010. MAP1B regulates axonal development by modulating Rho-GTPase Rac1 activity. Mol Biol Cell 21: 3518–3528. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2011. Local persistent activation during plasticity of single dendritic spines. Nature 472: 100–104. , , .
- 2003. Characterization of a brain-specific Rho GTPase-activating protein, p200RhoGAP. J Biol Chem 278: 4151–4159. , , , et al.
- 1999. Biological and regulatory properties of Vav-3, a new member of the Vav family of oncoproteins. Mol Cell Biol 19: 7870–7885. , .
- 2006. CD47 promotes neuronal development through Src- and FRG/Vav2-mediated activation of Rac and Cdc42. J Neurosci 26: 12397–12407. , , , , , , , , , , .
- 2010. Slit and netrin guide cranial motor axon pathfinding via Rho-kinase, myosin light chain, and myosin II. Neural Dev 5: 16–31. , , .
- 1999. Cellular functions of TC10, a Rho family GTPase: regulation of morphology, signal transduction and cell growth. Oncogene 18: 3831–3845. , , , , , , .
- 2001. Signaling mediated by the closely related mammalian Rho family GTPases TC10 and Cdc42 suggests distinct functional pathways. Cell Growth Differ 12: 157–167. , , , , , .
- 2008. PX-RICS mediates ER-to-Golgi transport of the N-cadherin/β-catenin complex Gene & Dev 22: 1244–1256. , , , , , , , , .
- 2000. Small GTPases Rac and Rho in the maintenance of dendritic spines and branches in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 20: 5329–5338. , , .
- 2008. Rho-kinase phosphorylates Par3 and disrupts Par complex formation. Dev Cell 14: 205–215. , , , , , , , .
- 2004. MOCA induces membrane spreading by activating Rac1. J Biol Chem 279: 14331–14337. , , , .
- 2012. Dock3 stimulates axonal outgrowth via GSK3-β-mediated microtubule assembly. J Neurosci 32: 264–271. , , , , , and .
- 2006. Role of the Rho GTPase-activating protein RICS in neurite outgrowth. Genes Cells 11: 607–614. , , , , , , , , .
- 1998. Distinct cellular effects and interactions of the Rho-family GTPase TC10. Curr Biol 8: 1151–1160. , , , .
- 2004 In vivo imaging of synapse formation on a growing dendritic arbor. Nat Neurosci 7: 254–260. , , .
- 2002. Rac GTPases control axon growth, guidance and branching. Nature 416: 442–447. , , , , , , , .
- 2004. Rho GTPases regulate axon growth through convergent and divergent signaling pathways. Neuron 44: 779–793. , .
- 1998. The p35/Cdk5 kinase is a neuron-specific Rac effector that inhibits Pak1 activity. Nature 395: 194–288. , , , , .
- 2005. PAR-6-PAR-3 mediates Cdc42-induced Rac activation through the Rac GEFs STEF/Tiam1. Nat Cell Biol 7: 270–277. , , , , , , , .
- 1995. Rho, Rac, Cdc42 regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia and filopodia. Cell 81: 53–62. , .
- 2002. Nerve growth factor signals through TrkA, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Rac1 to inactivate RhoA during the initiation of neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. J Biol Chem 277: 35840–35846. , , , .
- 2003. RICS, a novel GTPase-activating protein for Cdc42 and Rac1, is involved in the β-catenin-N-cadherin and N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 278: 9910–9927. , , , , , , , .
- 2003. Activation of Rho GTPases bysynaptic transmission in the hippocampus. J Neurochem 87: 1309–1312. , , .
- 2011. Rho-GTPases and exocytosis. What are the molecular links? Sem Cell & Dev Biol 22: 27–32. , .
- 2006. IGF-I specifically enhances axon outgrowth of corticospinal motor neurons. Nat Neurosci 9: 1371–1378 , .
- 2011. Proneural transcription factors regulate different steps of cortical neuronal migration through Rnd-mediated inhibition of RhoA signaling. Neuron 69: 1064–1084. , , , , , , , , , , .
- 1998a. Suppression of radixin and moesin alters growth cone morphology, motility and process formation in primary cultured neurons. J. Cell Biology 143: 443–455. , , , , .
- 1998b. Evidence for the participation of the neuron-specific activator p35 during laminin-enhanced axonal growth. J Neurosci 18: 9858–9869. , , , , , , , .
- 2001. mDia mediates Rho-regulated formation and orientation of stable microtubules. Nat Cell Biol 3: 723–729. , , , .
- 2006. Plasticity-induced growth of dendritic spines by exocytic trafficking from recycling endosomes. Neuron 52: 817–830. , , , , , , .
- 2004. Targeting intracellular signaling molecules within the neuron to promote repair after spinal cord injury. In Top Spinal Cord Rehab 10: 1–16. .
- 2002. Human RhoGAP domain-containing proteins: structure, function and evolutionary relationships. FEBS Lett 528: 27–34. , , , .
- 2001. Distinct roles for the two Rho GDP/GTP exchange factor domains of kalirin in regulation of neurite growth and neuronal morphology. J Neurosci 21: 8426–8434. , , , , .
- 2009. The C-terminal region of Rho B directs protein degradation through an endo-lysosomal pathway. Plos One 4: e8117. , , , , .
- 2006. Spatiotemporal regulation of Rho activity in migrating cells. Nature 440: 1062–1072. , , , .
- 2008. Spatial mapping of the neurite and soma proteomes reveals a functional Cdc42/Rac regulatory network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 1931–1936. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2010. Spatio-temporal Rho GTPase signaling - where are we now? J Cell Sci 123: 1841–1850. .
- 2009. Plasma membrane expansion: a neuron's Herculean task. Nat Rev Neurosci 10: 251–261. .
- 2011. Cytokinesis remnants define first neuronal asymmetry in vivo. Nat Neurosci 14: 1525–1533. , , , .
- 2006. Identification of novel neuronal isoforms of the Rho-GEF Trio. Biol Cell 98: 183–193. , , , , .
- 2008. A brief overview of the small Rho GTPases. Med Sci (Paris) 24: 157–162. , .
- 2002. Role of formins in actin assembly: Nucleation and barbed-end association. Science 297: 612–615. , , , , , , .
- 2002. Genomic organization and expression profile of the small GTPases of the RhoBTB family in human and mouse. Gene 298( 2): 147–157. , , .
- 2001. Phosphorylation of Pak1 by the p35/Cdk5 kinase affects neuronal morphology. J Biol Chem 276: 49043–49052. , , .
- 1999. Identification and characterization of hPEM-2, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor specific for Cdc42. J Biol Chem 274: 33587–33593. , , , .
- 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70: 389–399. , .
- 1992. The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70: 401–410. , , , , .
- 2006. Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. Trends Cell Biol 16: 522–529. .
- 1997a. Crystal structure of a small G protein in complex with the GTPase-activating protein rhoGAP. Nature 388: 693–697. , , , , , , , .
- 1997b. Structure at 1. 65 A of RhoA and its GTPase-activating protein in complex with a transition-state analogue. Nature 389: 758–762. , , , .
- 1995. Ultrastructural localization of ras-related proteins using epitope-tagged plasmids. J Histochem Cytochem 43: 471–480. , , , ,
- 2007. The neurite outgrowth multiadaptor RhoGAP, Noma-GAP, regulates neurite extension through SHP2 and Cdec42. J Cell Biol 178: 3503–3516. , , , .
- 2004. LIMK1 regulates Golgi dynamics, traffic of Golgi-derived vesicles, and process extension in primary cultured neurons. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3433–3449. , , , , , , , ,
- 2005. GEFs means go: turning on RhoGTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Cell Mol Biol 4: 167–180. , , .
- 1999. The neuronal architecture of Xenopus retinal ganglion cells is sculpted by rho-family GTPases in vivo. J Neurosci 19: 8454–8463. , , , , .
- 2005. The Rho-specific GEF, Lfc, interact with neurabin and spinophilin to regulate dendritic spine morphology. Neuron 47: 85–100. , , , , , , .
- 2007. G Protein βγ subunit controls dynein complex formation and regulates neurite outgrowth. EMBO J 26: 2621–2632. , , , , , , , , .
- 2010. RHO GTPase signaling for axon extension: is prenylation important? Mol Neurobiol 42: 133–142. , .
- 2010. Control of postnatal apoptosis in the cortex by RhoA-subfamily GTPases determines neuronal density. J Neurosci 30: 4221–4231. , , , , , , , , .
- 2008. Rotenone induced toxicity is mediated by Rho-GTPases in hippocampal neurons. Toxicol Sci 104: 352–361. , , , , .
- 1998. The Rho small G protein family-Rho GDI system as a temporal and spatial determinant for cytoskeletal control. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245: 641–645. , .
- 2003. Small GTPase Cdc42 is required for multiple aspects of dendritic morphogenesis. J Neurosci 23: 3118–3123. , ,
- 2006. Coupling receptor tyrosine kinases to Rho GTPases- what's the link. Cell Signal 18: 1834–1843. .
- 2002. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rho GTPases: turning on the switch. Genes Dev 16: 1587–1609. , .
- 2007. ROCK and Rho: biochemistry and neuronal function of rho-associate kinases. Neuroscientist 13: 454–469. , .
- 1996. Isolation and characterization of murine vav2, a member of the vav family of proto-oncogenes. Oncogene 13: 363–371. , , , , , , .
- 2004. Nogo and axon regeneration. Curr Op Neurobiol 114: 115–124. .
- 2004. The sequential activity of the GTPases Rap1B and Cdc42 determines neuronal polarity. Nat Neurosci 7: 923–929. , .
- 2003. Rho and Rac1 GTPases mediate the dynamic rearrangement of actin in peripheral glia. Development 130: 1825–1835. , .
- 2006. Interactions of UNC-34 Enabled with Rac GTPases and the NIK kinase MIG-15 in Caenorhabditis elegans axon pathfinding and neuronal migration. Genetics 172: 893–913. , , .
- 2006. The cell biology of synaptic plasticity: AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 613–643. , .
- 2003. Hippocampal neuronal polarity specified by spatially localized mPar3/mPar6 and PI 3-kinase activity. Cell 112: 63–75. , , .
- 2004. APC and GSK-3 are involved in mPar3 targeting to the nascent axon and establishment of neuronal polarity. Curr Biol 14: 2025–2032. , , , .
- 2009. Phosphorylation of RhoGDI1 by p21-activated kinase 2 mediates basic fibroblast growth factor-stimulated neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 379: 384–389. , , , , .
- 2002. Dendrite growth increased by visual activity requires NMDA receptor and Rho GTPases. Nature 419: 475–480. , , , .
- 2006. IGF-1 receptor is essential for the establishment of hippocampal neuronal polarity. Nat Neurosci 9: 993–995. , , , , , , , .
- 2011. Dynamics of the Rho-family small GTPases in actin regulation and motility. Cell Adh Migr 5: 170–180. , .
- 1997. Targeting of Tiam1 to the plasma membrane requires the cooperative function of the N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain and an adjacent protein interaction domain. J Biol Chem 272: 28744–29454. , , , , , , .
- 2002. Isoprenylation of RhoB is required for its degradation: a novel determinant in the complex regulation of RhoB expression by the mevalonate pathway. J Biol Chem 277: 49389–49396. , , , .
- 1997. Astrocyte spreading in response to thrombin and lysophosphatidic acid is dependent on the RhoGTPase. Glia 21: 244–252. , , , .
- 2006. Solo/Trio8, a membrane-associated short isoform of Trio, modulates endosome dynamics and neurite elongation. Mol Cell Biol 26: 6923–6935 , , , , , , , , , .
- 2005. MAP1A is required for activity induced dendritic growth and branching. Curr Biol 15: 1820–1826. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2009. Neuronal polarity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a001644. , .
- 2010. Rac1 regulates neuronal polarization through the WAVE complex. J Neurosci 30: 6930–6943. , , , , , , , , .
- 2007. Rho-kinase modulates the function of STEF, a Rac GEF, through its phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 355: 788–794. , , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2001. WASP and WAVE family proteins: key molecules for rapid rearrangement of cortical actin filaments and cell movement. J Cell Sci 114: 1801–1809. , .
- 2000. The small GTP-binding protein TC10 promotes nerve elongation in neuronal cells, and its expression is induced during nerve regeneration in rats. J Neurosci 20: 4138–4144. , , , , , , , , .
- 2006. Interaction between Tiam1 and the Arp2/3 complex links activation of Rac to actin polymerization. Biochem J 397: 39–45. , , , , , , .
- 1997. Regulation of dendritic growth and remodeling by Rho, Rac and Cdc42. Neuron 19: 625–634. , , .
- 1995. Rho family GTPases phosphoinositide kinases. J Biol Chem 270: 17655–17659. , , .
- 2011. Microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B) is required for dendritic spine development and synaptic transmission. J Biol Chem 286: 40638–40648. , , , , , , .
- 2001. A decade of Cdk5. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 749–759. .
- 2010. Involvement of p114-RhoGEF and Lfc in Wnt-3a– and Dishevelled-Induced RhoA Activation and Neurite Retraction in N1E-115 Mouse Neuroblastoma Cells. Mol Biol Cell 15: 3590–3600. , , , , , .
- 2005. ALS2/Alsin regulates Rac-PAK signaling and neurite outgrowth. J Biol Chem 280: 34735–34740. , , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2008. Microtubule-associated protein 1B interaction with tubuline tyrosine ligase contributes to the control microtubule tyrosination. Dev Neurosci 30: 200–210. , , , , , , , , , .
- 2004. Rho GTPases and activity-dependent dendritic development. Curr Op Neurobiol 14: 297–304. , .
- 2003. The C-terminal domain of Rac1 contains two motifs that control targeting and signaling specificity. J Biol Chem 278: 39166–39175. , , , , , , .
- 2001. Characterization of p190RhoGEF, a RhoA-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor that interacts with microtubules. J Biol Chem 276: 4948–4956. , , , , .
- 1997. The guanine nucleotide exchange factorTiam1 affects neuronal morphology: opposing roles for the small GTPases Rac and Rho. J Cell Biol 139: 797–807. , , , , , .
- 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291: 1304–1351. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2000. Characterization of TCL, a new GTPase of the rho family related to TC10 andCcdc42. J Biol Chem 275: 36457–36464. , , , , , , .
- 2007. RhoB and the mammalian Diaphanous-related formin mDia2 in endosome trafficking. Exp Cell Res 313: 560–571. , , , .
- 2006a. The Rac activator DOCK7 regulates neuronal polarity through local phosphorylation of stathmin/Op18. Neuron 51: 727–739. , , , , .
- 2006b. Regulators of RhoGTPase in neural development. J Neurosci 18: 10633–10635. , , .
- 1999. Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 1: 45–50. , , , .
- 2004. EB1 and APC bind to mDia to stabilize microtubules downstream of Rho and promote cell migration. Nat Cell Biol 6: 820–830. , , , , , , , , .
- 2004. Rho-family GTPases: it's not only Rac and Rho (and I like it). J Cell Sci 117: 1301–1312. , .
- 2004. Why three Rho proteins? RhoA, RhoB, RhoC, and cell motility. Exp Cell Res 301: 43–49. , .
- 2004. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors disrupt EGF receptor traffic through modulation of the RhoB GTPase. J Cell Sci 117: 3221–3231. , , , .
- 2005. Polarity proteins in axon specification and synaptogenesis. Dev Cell 8: 803–816. , , .
- 2000. Rapid dendritic remodeling in the developing retina: dependence on neurotransmission and reciprocal regulation by Rac and Rho. J Neurosci 20: 5024–5036. , , , .
- 2000. Crystal structure of Rac1 in complex with the guanine nucleotide exchange region of Tiam1. Nature 408: 682–688. , , .
- 2007. Kalirin-7 controls activity-dependent structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines. Neuron 56: 640–656. , , , , , , , , .
- 2008. Coordination of synaptic adhesion with dendritic spine remodeling by AF-6 and kalirin-7. J Neurosci 28: 6079–6091. , , , , , , , .
- 2010. Kalirin loss results in corticalmorphological alterations Mol Cell Neurosi 43: 81–87. , , .
- 2003. The p75 receptor acts as a displacement factor that releases Rho from Rho-GDI. Nature Neurosci. 6: 461–467. , .
- 2010. Structural and energetic mechanisms of cooperative autoinhibition and activacion of Vav. Cell 140: 246–256. , , , , , , , , . .
- 1996. RhoGDI-3 is a new GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI). Identification of a non-cytosolic GDI protein interacting with the small GTP-binding proteins RhoB and RhoG. J Biol Chem 27: 30366–30374. , , , , , , .
- 2003. Synapse formation is regulated by the signaling adaptor GIT1. J Cell Biol 161: 131–142. , , , .
- 2003. Rho-dependent contractile responses in the neuronal growth cone are independent of classical peripheral retrograde actin flow. Neuron 40: 931–944. , , , , .
- 1996. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate provides an alternative to guanine nucleotide exchange factors by stimulating the dissociation of GDP from Cdc42Hs. J Biol Chem 271: 23815–23819. , , , .
- 2001. Dbl family nucleotide exchange factors. Trends Biochem Sci 24: 724–732.
- 2006. Regeneration failure in the CNS. In: Brain Repair, Chapter 4. Blair M, editor. New York: Kluger Academic Publishers. p 54–76. , .