SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    KurmanRJ, SolomonD, editors. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes for terminology and specimen adequacy. New York: Springer Verlag, 1994: 6472.
  • 2
    Duska LR, Flynn CD, Chen A, Whall-Strojwas D, Goodman A. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 2: 27882.
  • 3
    Eddy GL, Strumpf KB, Wojtowycz MA, Piraino PS, Mazur MT. Biopsy findings in five hundred thirty-one patients with atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance as defined by the Bethesda system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 118895.
  • 4
    Goff BA, Atanasoff P, Brown E, Muntz HG, Bell DA, Rice LW. Endocervical glandular atypia in Papanicolaou smears. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 1014.
  • 5
    Kennedy AW, Salmieri SS, Wirth SL, Biscotti CV, Tuason LJ, Travarca MJ. Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervical cytology screening. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 1: 148.
  • 6
    Kim TJ, Kim HS, Park CT, Park IS, Hong SR, Park JS, et al. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal pap smears. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73: 2928.
  • 7
    Laverty CR, Farnsworth A, Thurloe J, Bowditch R. The reliability of a cytologic prediction of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 28: 30712.
  • 8
    Lee KR, Manna EA, St. John T. Atypical endocervical glandular cells: accuracy of cytologic diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1995; 13: 2028.
  • 9
    Nasu I, Meurer W, Fu YS. Endocervical glandular atypia and adenocarcinoma: a correlation of cytology and histology. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1993; 12: 20818.
  • 10
    Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, Ahdoot D, Kaleb V. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 8838.
  • 11
    Raab SS, Isacson C, Layfield LJ, Lenel JC, Slagel DD, Thomas PA. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: cytologic criteria to separate clinically significant from benign lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 104: 57482.
  • 12
    Ronnette B, Manos MM, Ransley JE, Fetterman BJ, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): cytopathologic features, histopathologic results, and human papillomavirus DNA detection. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 81625.
  • 13
    Schindler S, Pooley RJ, De Frias DVS, Yu GH, Bedrossian CW. Follow-up of atypical glandular cells in cervical-endocervical smears. Ann Diagn Pathol 1998; 2: 3127.
  • 14
    Veljovich DS, Stoler MH, Andersen WA, Covell JL, Rice LW. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: a five-year retrospective histopathologic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 38290.
  • 15
    Zweizig S, Noller K, Reale F, Collis S, Resseguie L. Neoplasia associated with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 65: 3148.
  • 16
    Roberts JM, Thurloe JK, Bowditch RC, Laverty CR. Subdividing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance according to the Australian modified Bethesda system: analysis of outcomes. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2000; 90: 8795.
  • 17
    Wilbur DC, Dubeshter B, Angel C, Atkinson KM. Use of thin-layer preparations for gynecological smears with emphasis on the cytomorphology of high-grade intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas. Diagn Cytopathol 1996; 14: 20111.
  • 18
    Corkill M, Knapp D, Martin J, Hutchinson ML. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study. Acta Cytol 1997; 41: 3944.
  • 19
    Austin RM, Ramzy I. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data. Acta Cytol 1998;42: 17884.
  • 20
    Eltabbakh GH, Lipman JN, Mount SL, Morgan A. Significance of atypical glandular cell of undetermined significance on ThinPrep Papanicolaou smears. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78: 24550.
  • 21
    Ashfaq R, Gibbons D, Vela C, Saboorian MH, Iliya F. ThinPrep test: accuracy for glandular disease. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 815.
  • 22
    Bai H, Sung CJ, Steinhoff MM. ThinPrep Pap test promotes detection of glandular lesions of the endocervix. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 1922.
  • 23
    Roberts JM, Thurloe JK, Bowditch RC, Humcevic J, Laverty CRA. Comparison of ThinPrep and Pap smear in relation to prediction of adenocarcinoma in situ. Acta Cytol 1999; 43: 7480.