SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Ernster V, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson I. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA. 1996; 275: 913918.
  • 2
    Swanson J, Ragheb N, Lin C-S, et al. Breast cancer among black and white women in the 1980s. Cancer. 1993; 72: 788798.
  • 3
    Schwartz G, Solin L, Olivotto I, Ernster V, Pressman P. The Consensus Conference on the Treatment of in Situ Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast, April 22–25, 1999. Hum Pathol. 2000; 31: 131139.
  • 4
    Simon M, Szhwartz A, Martino S, Swanson G. Trends in the diagnosis of in situ breast cancer in the Detroit metropolitan area, 1973-1987. Cancer. 1992; 69: 466469.
  • 5
    Zheng T, Holford T, Chen Y, Jones B, Flannery J, Boyle P. Time trend of female breast carcinoma in situ by race and histology in Connecticut, U.S.A. Eur J Cancer. 1997; 33: 96100.
  • 6
    Adams-Cameron M, Gilliland F, Hunt W, Key C. Trends in incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ in Hispanic, American Indian, and Non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1973-1994. Cancer. 1999; 85: 10841090.
  • 7
    Snipes K. Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer, 1988-1993. In: MorrisC, WrightW, editors. Breast cancer in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 1996: 522.
  • 8
    MillerB, KolonelL, BernsteinL, et al., editors. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States 1988-1992. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 1996 NIH Pub. No. 96-4104.
  • 9
    Sakorafas G, Tsiotou A. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: evolving perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2000; 26: 103125.
  • 10
    Skinner K, Silverstein M. The management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2001; 8: 3345.
  • 11
    Winchester D, Herman R, Winchester D. National treatment trends for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Arch Surg. 1997; 132: 660665.
  • 12
    Choi WS, Parker BA, Pierce JP, Greenberg ER. Regional differences in the incidence and treatment of carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996; 5: 317320.
  • 13
    Shavers V, Brown M. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 334357.
  • 14
    California Cancer Registry, August 2001 Submission. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 2001.
  • 15
    Kwong SL, Perkins CI, Morris CR, Cohen R, Allen M, Wright WE. Cancer in California: 1988-1999. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 2001.
  • 16
    Stewart SL, Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Horn-Ross PL, West DW. Adjustment of cancer incidence rates for ethnic misclassification. Biometrics. 1998; 54: 774781.
  • 17
    Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1970-2040 [database online]. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 1998.
  • 18
    Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1997. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 1999.
  • 19
    Department of Finance, State of California. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1998. Sacramento, CA: State of California, Department of Finance, 2000.
  • 20
    SEER*Stat. Computer program. Version 4.13. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2001.
  • 21
    California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey datasets 1988-2000. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, 2001.
  • 22
    California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey. SAS dataset documentation and technical report. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, 2002. Available from URL: http://www.surveyresearchgroup.com/UserFiles/BRFS01Doc.pdf [accessed June 18, 2002].
  • 23
    Liff J, Sung J, Chow W-H, Greenberg R, Flanders W. Does increased detection account for the rising incidence of breast cancer? Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 462465.
  • 24
    Simon M, Lemanne D, Schwartz A, Martino S, Swanson G. Recent trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer in the Detroit metropolitan area (1975-1988). Cancer. 1993; 71: 769774.
  • 25
    Hankey B, Miller B, Curtis R, Kosary C. Trends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast to older women. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 16: 714.
  • 26
    Kaplan RM, Navarro AM, Castro FG, et al. Increased use of mammography among Hispanic women: baseline results from the NCI Cooperative Group on Cancer Prevention in Hispanic Communities. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 467471.
  • 27
    Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 40: 3751.
  • 28
    Davis B. Utilization of screening mammography, 1987-1994. In: MorrisC, WrightW, editors. Breast cancer in California. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, 1996: 6176.
  • 29
    Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 190203.
  • 30
    May DS, Lee NC, Nadel MR, Henson RM, Miller DS. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 97104.
  • 31
    California Department of Health Services. Mammography screening among women aged 40 and older, by income status and race/ethnicity; California, 1997. Data Points. Results from the 1997 California Women's Health Survey 1999;1:21. Available from URL: http://www.surveyresearchgroup.com/UserFiles/97dp2126.pdf [accessed June 18, 2002].
  • 32
    Ramirez AG, Talavera GA, Villarreal R, et al. Breast cancer screening in regional Hispanic populations. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15: 559568.
  • 33
    Natarajan N, Nemoto D, Nemoto T, Mettlin C. Breast cancer survival among Orientals and Whites living in the United States. J Surg Oncol. 1988; 39: 206209.
  • 34
    Prehn A, Lin S, Clarke C, et al. Cancer Incidence in Chinese, Japanese and Filipinos in the US and Asia, 1988-92. Union City, CA: Northern California Cancer Center, 1999.
  • 35
    Parker J, Gebretsadik T, Sabogal F, Newman J, Lawson HW. Mammography screening among California Medicare beneficiaries: 1993-1994. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15: 198205.
  • 36
    Chen VW, Correa P, Kurman RJ, et al. Histological characteristics of breast carcinoma in Blacks and Whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994; 3: 127135.
  • 37
    Jones B, Kasl S, Curnen M, Owens P, Dubrow R. Can mammography screening explain the race difference in stage at diagnosis of breast cancer? Cancer. 1995; 75: 21032113.
  • 38
    Hunter CP, Redmond CK, Chen VW, et al. Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 11291137.
  • 39
    Page D, Dupont W, Rogers L, Jensen R, Schuyler P. Continued local recurrence of carcinoma 15-25 years after a diagnosis of low grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated only by biopsy. Cancer. 1995; 76: 11972000.
  • 40
    Welch H, Black W. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease reservoir for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find? Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 10231028.
  • 41
    Ernster V, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R. Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 953958.
  • 42
    Morris C, Cohen R, Schlag R, Wright W. Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 281284.