SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    van Ballegooijen M. Effects and costs of cervical cancer screening [Ph.D. thesis]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1998.
  • 2
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) working group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. BMJ. 1986; 293: 659664.
  • 3
    Anonymous. National Institutes of Health consensus conference on cervical cancer. Bethesda, Maryland, April 1–3, 1996. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996; 21: 1148.
  • 4
    Vooijs GP, van Aspert-van Erp AJ, van't Hof-Grotenboer BE, Hanselaar AG. Parameters of quality control in cervical cytodiagnosis. In: WiedGL, KeeblerCM, RosenthalDL, SchenckU, SomrakTM, VooijsGP, editors. Compendium on quality assurance, proficiency testing, and workload limitation in clinical cytology. Chicago: International Academy of Cytology, 1995: 95108.
  • 5
    Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 141: 680689.
  • 6
    Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 132: 810819.
  • 7
    Payne N, Chilcott J, McCoogan E. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening. A report by the School of Health And Related Research (ScHARR), the University of Sheffield, for the NCCHTA on behalf of NICE. Sheffield, United Kingdom: Trent Institute for Health Services Research, 2000.
  • 8
    Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Evaluation of cervical cytology. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 5. Rockville: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1999.
  • 9
    Broadstock M. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of automated and semi-automated cervical screening devices: a systematic review. New Zealand health technology assessment report. Volume 3 Christchurch: Clearing House for Health Outcomes and Health Technology Assessment, 2000.
  • 10
    Cuzick J, Sasieni P, Davies P, et al. A systematic review of the role of human papillomavirus testing within a cervical screening programme. Health Technol Assess. 1999; 3: 1196.
  • 11
    Vassilakos P, Schwartz D, de Marval F,et al. Biopsy-based comparison of liquid-based, thin-layer preparations to conventional Pap smears. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45: 1116.
  • 12
    Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol. 1998; 42: 189197.
  • 13
    Bishop JW. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41: 1523.
  • 14
    Minge L, Fleming M, VanGeem T, Bishop JW. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45: 179184.
  • 15
    Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 1999; 87: 4855.
  • 16
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille CS, Franco F, Arseneau J, Richart RM, Wright TC. Conventional cervical cytology vs. ThinPrep smears. Acta Cytol. 1996; 40: 11361142.
  • 17
    Bolick DR, Hellman DJ. Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system. Acta Cytol. 1998; 42: 209213.
  • 18
    Carpenter AB, Davey DD. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital. Cancer. 1999; 87: 105112.
  • 19
    Sheets EE, Constantine NM, Dinisco S, Dean B, Cibas ES. Colposcopically directed biopsies provide a basis for comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep and Papanicolaou smears. J Gynecol Tech. 1995; 1: 2733.
  • 20
    Guidos BJ, Selvaggi SM. Use of the ThinPrep Pap Test® in clinical practice. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999; 20: 7073.
  • 21
    Park IA, Lee SN, Chae SW, Park KH, Kim JW, Lee HP. Comparing the accuracy of ThinPrep Pap tests and conventional Papanicolaou smears on the basis of the histologic diagnosis: a clinical study of women with cervical abnormalities. Acta Cytol. 2001; 45: 525531.
  • 22
    Bergeron C, Bishop J, Lemarie A, et al. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy. Acta Cytol. 2001; 45: 519524.
  • 23
    Ashfaq R, Gibbons D, Vela C, Saboorian MH, Iliya F. ThinPrep Pap test. Accuracy for glandular disease. Acta Cytol. 1999; 43: 8185.
  • 24
    Schorge JO, Hossein Saboorian M, Hynan L, Ashfaq R. ThinPrep detection of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer. 2002; 96: 338343.