Fax: (507) 538-0823
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Reoperations after prophylactic mastectomy with or without implant reconstruction
Article first published online: 8 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11757
Copyright © 2003 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Zion, S. M., Slezak, J. M., Sellers, T. A., Woods, J. E., Arnold, P. G., Petty, P. M., Donohue, J. H., Frost, M. H., Schaid, D. J. and Hartmann, L. C. (2003), Reoperations after prophylactic mastectomy with or without implant reconstruction. Cancer, 98: 2152–2160. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11757
- †
Fax: (507) 538-0823
Publication History
- Issue published online: 30 OCT 2003
- Article first published online: 8 OCT 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 4 AUG 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 30 JUL 2003
- Manuscript Received: 9 JUN 2003
Funded by
- U.S. Department of Defense. Grant Number: DAMD17-94-J-4216
- National Cancer Institute. Grant Number: R01-80181
- Andersen Foundation
REFERENCES
- 1, , , et al. Clinical options for women at high risk for breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79: 1189–1206.
- 2, , , et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 77–84.
- 3, , , et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 159–164.
- 4, , , et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3938–3943.
- 5, , , et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 1633–1637.
- 6, , . Risk-reduction mastectomy: Clinical issues and research needs. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 1297–1306.
- 7, , , et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 677–682.
- 8. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc [Ser B]. 1972; 34: 187–220.
- 9, . Cox's regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Stat. 1982; 10: 1100–1120.
- 10. Breast reconstruction following mastectomy. CA Cancer J Clin. 1995; 45: 289–304.
- 11, , , et al. An analysis of silicone gel-filled breast implants: diagnosis and failure rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102: 2304–2308.
- 12, , . Rupture and aging of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 91: 828–834.
- 13, , , et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg. 1993; 166: 1–5.
- 14, . Surgical complications and follow-up evaluation of 163 patients with subcutaneous mastectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1987; 11: 45–48.
- 15, , , et al. Prophylactic mastectomy and inherited predisposition to breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999; 86(Suppl): 2502–2516.
- 16, , , et al. Comparison of resource costs between implant-based and TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 97: 364–372.
- 17, . A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 90: 455–462.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)