Fax: 011-39-02-2668-1292
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Breast carcinoma survival in Europe and the United States
A population-based study
Article first published online: 29 DEC 2003
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20038
Copyright © 2003 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sant, M., Allemani, C., Berrino, F., Coleman, M. P., Aareleid, T., Chaplain, G., Coebergh, J. W., Colonna, M., Crosignani, P., Danzon, A., Federico, M., Gafà, L., Grosclaude, P., Hédelin, G., Macè-Lesech, J., Garcia, C. M., Møller, H., Paci, E., Raverdy, N., Tretarre, B., Williams, E. M. I. and European Concerted Action on Survival and Care of Cancer Patients (EUROCARE) Working Group (2004), Breast carcinoma survival in Europe and the United States. Cancer, 100: 715–722. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20038
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 FEB 2004
- Article first published online: 29 DEC 2003
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 NOV 2003
- Manuscript Revised: 14 NOV 2003
- Manuscript Received: 16 SEP 2003
Funded by
- BIOMED Programme of the European Community
- Europe Against Cancer Programme (European Breast Cancer Screening Network). Grant Number: 2000/CAN/201
REFERENCES
- 1, , , et al. Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patients. Cancer. 2000; 89: 893–900.Direct Link:
- 2, , , et al. Survival of women with breast cancer in Europe: variation with age, year of diagnosis and country. Int J Cancer. 1998; 77: 679–683.Direct Link:
- 3, , , EUROCARE Working Group. Variations in survival from breast cancer in Europe by age and country, 1978-1989. Eur J Cancer. 1998; 34: 2204–2211.
- 4, EUROCARE Working Group. Differences in stage and therapy for breast cancer across Europe. Int J Cancer. 2001; 93: 894–901.Direct Link:
- 5, , . The Will Rogers phenomenon: stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 1604–1608.
- 6, , , et al. Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe. Int J Cancer. 2003; 106: 416–422.Direct Link:
- 7SpiesslB, BeahrsOH, HermanekP, et al., editors. TNM atlas: illustrated guide to the TNM/pTNM classification of malignant tumors, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1992.
- 8U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1999. [Dataset on CDROM]. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2001.
- 9
- 10, , , et al. Relative survival and the estimation of net survival: elements for further discussion. Stat Med. 1990; 9: 529–538.Direct Link:
- 11, . A computer program package for relative survival analysis. Comput Programs Biomed. 1985; 19: 197–207.
- 12, , , et al. Regression models for relative survival analysis. Stat Med. 2004; 23: 51–64.Direct Link:
- 13, , , , et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985; i: 829–832.
- 14, , , et al. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radio Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 187–210.
- 15, , , et al. Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: population based cohort study. BMJ. 1997; 314: 864–867.
- 16, , , et al. Effect of NHS Breast Screening Programme on mortality from breast cancer in England and Wales, 1990-8: comparison of observed with predicted mortality. BMJ. 2000; 321: 665–669.
- 17, , , et al. Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. Eur J Cancer. 2003; 39: 1718–1729.
- 18
- 19BerrinoF, CapocacciaR, EstèveJ, et al., editors. Survival of cancer patients in Europe: the EUROCARE-2 study. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 151. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1999.
- 20BerrinoF, SantM, VerdecchiaA, CapocacciaR, HakulinenT, EstèveJ, editors. Survival of cancer patients in Europe: the EUROCARE study. IARC Scientific Pub. No. 132. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1995.
- 21, , , et al. The EUROCARE study of survival of cancer patients in Europe: aims, current status, strengths and weaknesses. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37: 673–677.
- 22, , , et al. Cancer survival trends in England and Wales 1971-1995: deprivation and NHS region. Series SMPS No. 61. London: The Stationery Office, 1999.
- 23, , , et al. Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales. Cancer. 2001; 91: 208–216.Direct Link:
- 24, . Recent trends in breast cancer mortality among white and black US women. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 775–781.
- 25, , , et al. Projecting SEER cancer survival rates to the US: an ecological regression approach. Cancer Causes Control. 2002; 13: 101–111.
- 26, , . Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 49–56.
- 27, , , et al. Breast cancer survival and treatment in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 1683–1691.
- 28, , . Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA. 1994; 271: 1163–1168.
- 29, , . Race, socioeconomic status and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 490–496.
- 30, , , et al. Does cancer survival in Kentucky depend on health insurance coverage? Arch Intern Med. In Press.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)