SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Meissner HI, Smith RA, Rimer BK, et al. Promoting cancer screening: learning from experience. Cancer. In press.
  • 2
    Hiatt RA. Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: adherence to cancer screening advice. Prev Med. 1997; 26: S11S18.
  • 3
    Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, et al. Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 15711579.
  • 4
    Hiatt RA, Rimer BK. A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 957964.
  • 5
    Hedeen AN, White E. Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992–1995. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 122125.
  • 6
    Sondik EJ. Breast cancer trends. Incidence, mortality, and survival. Cancer. 1994; 74: 995999.
  • 7
    Marbella AM, Layde PM. Racial trends in age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in US women. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 118121.
  • 8
    Ghafoor A, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 326341.
  • 9
    NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey studies. JAMA. 1990; 264: 5458.
  • 10
    Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 5360.
  • 11
    Breen N, Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 6267.
  • 12
    Anderson LM, May DS. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States? Am J Public Health. 1995; 85: 840842.
  • 13
    Kaplan RM, Navarro AM, Castro FG, et al. Increased use of mammography among Hispanic women: baseline results from the NCI Cooperative Group on Cancer Prevention in Hispanic Communities. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 467471.
  • 14
    Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath CW Jr. Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 8290.
  • 15
    Pearlman DN, Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Clark MA. Breast cancer screening practices among black, Hispanic, and white women: reassessing differences. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 327337.
  • 16
    Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 17041713.
  • 17
    Glanz K, Croyle RT, Chollette VY, Pinn VW. Cancer-related health disparities in women. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 292298.
  • 18
    Rakowski W, Rimer BK, Bryant SA. Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Public Health Rep. 1993; 108: 605624.
  • 19
    Pearlman DN, Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B. Screening for breast and cervical cancers: the importance of knowledge and perceived cancer survivability. Women Health. 1999; 28: 93112.
  • 20
    Clark MA, Rakowski W, Kviz FJ, Hogan JW. Age and stage of readiness for smoking cessation. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997; 52(4): S212S221.
  • 21
    Institute of Medicine. Healthy people 2000: citizens chart the course. StotoMA, BehrensR, RosemontC, editors. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
  • 22
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Satcher D. Healthy people 2010. McLean, VA: International Medical Publishing, Inc., 2001.
  • 23
    American Cancer Society Board of Directors. ACS challenge goals for U.S. cancer mortality for the year 2015. Proceeding of the Board of Directors. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1998.
  • 24
    Byers T, Mouchawar J, Marks J, et al. The American Cancer Society challenge goals. How far can cancer rates decline in the U.S. by the year 2015? Cancer. 1999; 86: 715727.
  • 25
    Boss LP, Guckes FH. Medicaid coverage of screening tests for breast and cervical cancer. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 252253.
  • 26
    McKinney MM, Marconi KM. Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography. J Community Health. 1992; 17: 333349.
  • 27
    Moore KG. A survey of state Medicaid policies for coverage of screening mammography and Pap smear services. Womens Health Issues. 1992; 2: 4049.
  • 28
    Rathore SS, McGreevey JD III, Schulman KA, Atkins D. Mandated coverage for cancer-screening services: whose guidelines do states follow? Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19: 7178.
  • 29
    Vernon SW, Laville EA, Jackson GL. Participation in breast screening programs: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1990; 30: 11071118.
  • 30
    Bastani R, Marcus AC, Hollatz-Brown A. Screening mammography rates and barriers to use: a Los Angeles County survey. Prev Med. 1991; 20: 350363.
  • 31
    Fox SA, Stein JA. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care. 1991; 29: 10651082.
  • 32
    Smith RA, Haynes S. Barriers to screening for breast cancer. Cancer. 1992; 69: 19681978.
  • 33
    AMC Cancer Research Center. Breast and cervical screening: barriers and use among specific populations. Denver, CO: AMC Cancer Research Center, 1992.
  • 34
    Mayer JA, Slymen DJ, Drew JA, Wright BL, Elder JP, Williams SJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening in older women: the San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 395404.
  • 35
    Urban N, Anderson GL, Peacock S. Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use? Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 5055.
  • 36
    NCI Cancer Screening Consortium for Underserved Women. Breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved women. Baseline survey results from six states. Arch Fam Med. 1995; 4: 617624.
  • 37
    Lauver D. Understanding barriers to mammography use among women of low socioeconomic status: comparisons from quantitative and qualitative data. J Womens Health. 1996; 5: 473480.
  • 38
    Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 14061422.
  • 39
    Giuliano A, Papenfuss M, de Guernsey de Zapien J, Tilousi S, Nuvayestewa L. Breast cancer screening among southwest American Indian women living on-reservation. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 135143.
  • 40
    Richards CL, Viadro CI, Earp JA. Bringing down the barriers to mammography: a review of current research and interventions. Breast Dis. 1998; 10: 3344.
  • 41
    Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 223228.
  • 42
    Mandelson MT, Curry SJ, Anderson LA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening participation by older women. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19: 149154.
  • 43
    Tang TS, Solomon LJ, McCracken LM. Cultural barriers to mammography, clinical breast exam, and breast self-exam among Chinese-American women 60 and older. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 575583.
  • 44
    Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, Seeff LC. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2002; 35: 199206.
  • 45
    Skinner CS, Champion V, Menon U, Seshadri R. Racial and educational differences in mammography-related perceptions among 1,336 nonadherent women. J Psychosocial Oncol. 2002; 20: 118.
  • 46
    Clark MA, Rakowski W, Bonacore LB. Status of the prevalence of repeat mammography and issues of assessment. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26: 201211.
  • 47
    Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, Kanetsky P, Kao R. Targeting breast and cervical cancer screening to elderly poor black women: who will participate? The Harlem Study Team. Prev Med. 1993; 22: 2033.
  • 48
    Lechner L, de Vries H, Offermans N. Participation in a breast cancer screening program: influence of past behavior and determinants on future screening participation. Prev Med. 1997; 26: 473482.
  • 49
    Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 110.
  • 50
    National Cancer Policy Board. Potential of screening to reduce the burden of cancer. In: CurrySJ, ByersT, HewittM, editors. Fulfilling the potential of cancer prevention and early detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003: 156223.
  • 51
    Schnoll RA, Bradley P, Miller SM, Unger M, Babb J, Cornfeld M. Psychological issues related to the use of spiral CT for lung cancer early detection. Lung Cancer. 2003; 39: 315325.
  • 52
    Black WC, Haggstrom DA, Welch HG. All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 167173.
  • 53
    Juffs HG, Tannock IF. Screening trials are even more difficult than we thought they were. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 156157.
  • 54
    Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S, et al. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993; 341: 973978.
  • 55
    Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995; 273: 149154.
  • 56
    Gotzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet. 2000; 355: 129134.
  • 57
    Olsen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet. 2001; 358: 13401342.
  • 58
    Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137(5 Part 1): 347360.
  • 59
    Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 16441656.
  • 60
    Leitch AM, Dodd GD, Costanza M, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: update 1997. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997; 47: 150153.
  • 61
    Fletcher SW. Breast cancer screening among women in their forties: an overview of the issues. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22): 59.
  • 62
    Smith RA. Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000; 50: 312336.
  • 63
    Lee CH. Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002; 40: 395407.
  • 64
    Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan E, Woolf SH. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer. In press.
  • 65
    Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Gebretsadik T, Newman J. Is screening mammography effective in elderly women? Am J Med. 2000; 108: 112119.
  • 66
    Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer. In press.
  • 67
    Rakowski W. The potential variances of tailoring in health behavior interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1999; 21: 284289.
  • 68
    Rakowski W, Clark MA. The potential for health care organizations to promote maintenance and change in health behaviors among the elderly. In: SchaieKW, LeventhalH, WillisSL, editors. Effective health behavior in older adults. New York: Springer, 2002: 245278.
  • 69
    Sickles EA. The controversy concerning mammographic screening for women age 40–49. J Womens Health. 1996; 5: 37.
  • 70
    Healy BP. Screening mammography for women in their forties: the Panel of Babel. J Womens Health. 1997; 6: 13.
  • 71
    Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 342362.
  • 72
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002. Available from URL: http://www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/breastcancer/brcanrr.htm[accessed August 1, 2003].
  • 73
    Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Turvey C, Fishkin SA. Attributions of responsibility and persuasion: increasing mammography utilization among women over 40 with an internally oriented message. Health Psychol. 1993; 12: 3947.
  • 74
    Bundek NI, Marks G, Richardson JL. Role of health locus of control beliefs in cancer screening of elderly Hispanic women. Health Psychol. 1993; 12: 193199.
  • 75
    Aiken LS, West SG, Woodward CK, Reno RR, Reynolds KD. Increasing screening mammography in asymptomatic women: evaluation of a second-generation, theory-based program. Health Psychol. 1994; 13: 526538.
  • 76
    Diefenbach MA, Miller SM, Daly MB. Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 532536.
  • 77
    Clemow L, Costanza ME, Haddad WP, et al. Underutilizers of mammography screening today: characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 8088.
  • 78
    Curry SJ, Emmons KM. Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening. Ann Behav Med. 1994; 16: 302316.
  • 79
    Gritz ER, Moon TE. The new cancer prevention and control. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1992; 1: 163165.
  • 80
    Institute of Medicine. Committee on Communication for Behavior Change in the 21st Century: Improving the health of diverse populations. Theory. In: xxxxxxx, editors. Speaking of health: assessing health communication strategies for diverse populations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002: 2875.
  • 81
    Montaño DE, Taplin SH. A test of an expanded theory of reasoned action to predict mammography participation. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32: 733741.
  • 82
    Myers RE, Ross E, Jepson C, et al. Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 1994; 23: 142151.
  • 83
    Miller SM, Mischel W, O'Leary A, Mills M. From human papillomavirus (HPV) to cervical cancer: psychosocial processes in infection, detection, and control. Ann Behav Med. 1996; 18: 219228.
  • 84
    Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Dube CA, et al. Screening mammography and the transtheoretical model: robustness of associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption. Ann Behav Med. 1996; 18: 91100.
  • 85
    Skinner CS, Arfken CL, Sykes RK. Knowledge, perceptions, and mammography stage of adoption among older urban women. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 5463.
  • 86
    Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol. 1998; 17: 290299.
  • 87
    Champion VL. Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health. 1999; 22: 341348.
  • 88
    Lane DS, Zapka J, Breen N, Messina CR, Fotheringham DJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. For the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 481493.
  • 89
    Orleans CT. Promoting the maintenance of health behavior change: recommendations for the next generation of research and practice. Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 7683.
  • 90
    Rothman AJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 6469.
  • 91
    GlanzK, RimerBK, LewisFM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 3rd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
  • 92
    Helmes AW. Application of the protection motivation theory to genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Prev Med. 2002; 35: 453462.
  • 93
    Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. In press.
  • 94
    Smedley BD, Syme SL. Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2000. Available from URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309071755/html[accessed September 9, 2003].
  • 95
    Kaplan GA, Everson SA, Lynch JW. The contribution of social and behavioral research to an understanding of the distribution of disease: a multilevel approach. In: SmedleyBD, SymeSL, editors. Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2000: 3780.
  • 96
    Rakowski W, Dube CA, Goldstein MG. Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Educ Res. 1996; 11: 7796.
  • 97
    Legler J, Breen N, Meissner H, Malec D, Coyne C. Predicting patterns of mammography use: a geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37: 929947.
  • 98
    Wells BL, Horm JW. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 14841489.
  • 99
    Kreuter M, Farrell DW, Olevitch L, Brennan LK, Rimer BK. Tailoring health messages: customizing communication with computer technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
  • 100
    Green LW, Kreuter MW, Deeds SG, Partridge KB. Health education planning: a diagnostic approach. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1980.
  • 101
    Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach, 3rd edition. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 102
    Bartholemew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention mapping: designing theory and evidence-based health promotion programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2001.
  • 103
    Lee C, Owens RG. Issues for a psychology of men's health. J Health Psychol. 2002; 7: 209217.
  • 104
    StecklerA, LinnanL, editors. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
  • 105
    Hillman BJ. Physicians” acquisition and use of new technology in an era of economic constraints. In: GelignsAC, editor. Medical innovation at the crossroads. Volume III. Technology and health care in an era of limits. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 1992: 133149.
  • 106
    NassSJ, HendersonIC, LashofJC, editors. Mammography and beyond: developing technologies for the early detection of breast cancer. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2001.
  • 107
    Wang L. Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 344346.
  • 108
    Lieberman DA. Screening for colorectal cancer. Clin Cornerstone. 2002; 4: 110.
  • 109
    Levin B, Brooks D, Smith RA, Stone A. Emerging technologies in screening for colorectal cancer: CT colonography, immunochemical fecal occult blood tests, and stool screening using molecular markers. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003; 53: 4455.
  • 110
    Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Howell LP. New tests for cervical cancer screening. Am Fam Physician. 2001; 64: 780786.