• 1
    Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 282298.
  • 2
    Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 3rd edition. Mountain View: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 3
    Breslow L. Social ecological strategies for promoting healthy lifestyles. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 253257.
  • 4
    Phillips KA, Morrison KR, Andersen R, Aday LA. Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization. Health Serv Res. 1998; 33: 571596.
  • 5
    Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12: 413.
  • 6
    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996; 74: 511544.
  • 7
    Pasick RJ, Hiatt RA, Paskett ED. Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research. Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl 5): XXXXXX.
  • 8
    Pleis JR, Coles R. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey. Vital and health statistics, 10[212]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003.
  • 9
    Stange KC, Flocke SA, Goodwin MA. Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers? J Fam Pract. 1998; 46: 419424.
  • 10
    AdayLA, BegleyCE, LairsonDA, SlaterCH, editors. Evaluating the medical care system: effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. 2nd edition. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press, 1998.
  • 11
    Greenlick MR. Educating physicians for population-based clinical practice. JAMA. 1992; 267: 16451648.
  • 12
    Woolf SH, Jonas S, Lawrence RS. Health promotion and disease prevention in clinical practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
  • 13
    CurrySJ, ByersT, HewittM, editors. Fulfilling the potential of cancer prevention and early detection. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, National Academies Press, 2003.
  • 14
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Guide to clinical preventive services. 3rd edition (periodic updates). Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003.
  • 15
    Sharf BF. Out of the closet and into the legislature: breast cancer stories. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 213218.
  • 16
    Ware JE Jr., Davies AP, Rubin HR. Patients' assessments of their care. In: The quality of medical care: information for consumers. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, 1988: 231247.
  • 17
    Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988; 25: 2536.
  • 18
    Epstein A. Performance reports on quality—prototypes, problems, and prospects. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333: 5761.
  • 19
    Corrigan JM, Nielsen DM. Toward the development of uniform reporting standards for managed care organizations: the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, version 2.0. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1993; 19: 566575.
  • 20
    Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport: Auburn House, 1992.
  • 21
    Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt IS. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998; 3: 100107.
  • 22
    Edwards A, Unigwe S, Elwyn G, Hood K. Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about entering screening programs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; 1: CD001865.
  • 23
    Walter LC, Covinsky KE. Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making. JAMA. 2001; 285: 27502756.
  • 24
    Entwistle V. The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes. Health Expect. 2001; 4: 109115.
  • 25
    Woolf SH. The best screening test for colorectal cancer—a personal choice. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 16411643.
  • 26
    Rimer BK, Briss PA, Zeller PK, Chan E, Woolf SH. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening? Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl 5): XXXXXX.
  • 27
    Zuvekas SH, Taliaferro GS. Pathways to access: health insurance, the health care delivery system, and racial/ethnic disparities, 1996–1999. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003; 22: 139153.
  • 28
    National Center for Health Statistics, Nelson C, McLemore T. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States, 1975–1981 and 1985 trends: data from the National Health Survey. Vital and health statistics, 13[93]. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, Government Printing Office, 1988.
  • 29
    Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003; 97: 15281540.
  • 30
    Garner EI. Cervical cancer: disparities in screening, treatment, and survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12: 242S247S.
  • 31
    Nguyen TT, McPhee SJ, Nguyen T, Lam T, Mock J. Predictors of cervical Pap smear screening awareness, intention, and receipt among Vietnamese-American women. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23: 207214.
  • 32
    Brooks SE, Chen TT, Ghosh A, Mullins CD, Gardner JF, Baquet CR. Cervical cancer outcomes analysis: impact of age, race, and comorbid illness on hospitalizations for invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 79: 107115.
  • 33
    Hsia J, Kemper E, Kiefe C, et al. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 261270.
  • 34
    Potosky AL, Breen N, Graubard BI, Parsons PE. The association between health care coverage and the use of cancer screening tests. Results from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey. Med Care. 1998; 36: 257270.
  • 35
    Makuc DM, Freid VM, Parsons PE. Health insurance and cancer screening among women. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics, 1994.
  • 36
    Frame PS. Health maintenance in clinical practice: strategies and barriers. Am Fam Physician. 1992; 45: 11921200.
  • 37
    Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994; 38: 166171.
  • 38
    Lewis JD, Asch DA. Barriers to office-based screening sigmoidoscopy: does reimbursement cover costs? Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130: 525530.
  • 39
    Ashford A, Gemson D, Sheinfeld Gorin SN, et al. Cancer screening and prevention practices of inner-city physicians. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19: 5962.
  • 40
    Gordon NP, Rundall TG, Parker L. Type of health care coverage and the likelihood of being screened for cancer. Med Care. 1998; 36: 636645.
  • 41
    Udvarhelyi IS, Jennison K, Phillips RS, Epstein AM. Comparison of the quality of ambulatory care for fee-for-service and prepaid patients. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 115: 394400.
  • 42
    Carrasquillo O, Lantigua RA, Shea S. Preventive services among Medicare beneficiaries with supplemental coverage versus HMO enrollees, Medicaid recipients, and elders with no additional coverage. Med Care. 2001; 39: 616626.
  • 43
    Marcus AC, Crane LA. A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: implications for public health programs and future research. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 1331.
  • 44
    McCarthy BD, Yood MU, Janz NK, Boohaker EA, Ward RE, Johnson CC. Evaluation of factors potentially associated with inadequate follow-up of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer. 1996; 77: 20702076.
  • 45
    Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and 2Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 223228.
  • 46
    McBride CM, Curry SJ, Taplin S, Anderman C, Grothaus L. Exploring environmental barriers to participation in mammography screening in an HMO. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1993; 2: 599605.
  • 47
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Put prevention into practice: tools and resources. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002. Available from URL:[accessed February 21, 2004].
  • 48
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Davis T, Ha NT, Jenkins CN, Le B. Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13: 205213.
  • 49
    Kelly RB, Shank JC. Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Med Care. 1992; 30: 10291042.
  • 50
    Brenes GA, Paskett ED. Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 410416.
  • 51
    Weitzman ER, Zapka J, Estabrook B, Goins KV. Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2001; 32: 502513.
  • 52
    Mamon JA, Shediac MC, Crosby CB, Sanders B, Matanoski GM, Celentano DD. Inner-city women at risk for cervical cancer: behavioral and utilization factors related to inadequate screening. Prev Med. 1990; 19: 363376.
  • 53
    Ruchlin HS. Prevalence and correlates of breast and cervical cancer screening among older women. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90: 1621.
  • 54
    Grady KE, Lemkau JP, McVay JM, Reisine ST. The importance of physician encouragement in breast cancer screening of older women. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 766780.
  • 55
    Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 13061311.
  • 56
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999; 282: 14581465.
  • 57
    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998; 317: 465468.
  • 58
    Curry SJ. Organizational interventions to encourage guideline implementation. Chest. 2000; 118: 40S46S.
  • 59
    Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians' practices. Tob Control. 1997; 6 (Suppl 1): S68S70.
  • 60
    Cooper GS, Fortinsky RH, Hapke R, Landefeld CS. Primary care physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening. Patient and practitioner factors. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 19461950.
  • 61
    Lewis CE. Disease prevention and health promotion practices of primary care physicians in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 1988; 4: 916.
  • 62
    Podolsky DK. Going the distance—the case for true colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 207208.
  • 63
    Lane DS, Messina CR. Current perspectives on physician barriers to breast cancer screening. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999; 12: 815.
  • 64
    Costanza ME, Hoople NE, Gaw VP, Stoddard AM. Cancer prevention practices and continuing education needs of primary care physicians. Am J Prev Med. 1993; 9: 107112.
  • 65
    Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making “time” for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993; 68: 785791.
  • 66
    Dunn AS, Shridharani KV, Lou W, Bernstein J, Horowitz CR. Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 130134.
  • 67
    Stange KC, Fedirko T, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR. How do family physicians prioritize delivery of multiple preventive services? J Fam Pract. 1994; 38: 231237.
  • 68
    Potter SJ, Mauldin PD, Hill HA. Access to and participation in breast cancer screening: a review of recent literature. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1996; 4: 7485.
  • 69
    Fylan F. Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 1998; 48: 15091514.
  • 70
    Clemow L, Costanza ME, Haddad WP, et al. Underutilizers of mammography screening today: characteristics of women planning, undecided about, and not planning a mammogram. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 8088.
  • 71
    Fajardo LL, Saint-Germain M, Meakem TJ III, Rose C, Hillman BJ. Factors influencing women to undergo screening mammography. Radiology. 1992; 184: 5963.
  • 72
    Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, Kanetsky P, Kao R. Mammography and Papanicolaou smear use by elderly poor black women. The Harlem Study Team. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40: 10011007.
  • 73
    Rimer BK. Mammography use in the U.S.: trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1994; 16: 317326.
  • 74
    Paskett ED, D'Agostino R Jr., Tatum C, Velez R, Brenes GA. Colorectal cancer screening practices among low-income women. Clin J Womens Health. 2000; 1: 39.
  • 75
    Brown ML, Potosky AL, Thompson GB, Kessler LG. The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 1990; 19: 562574.
  • 76
    Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ III. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97: 31863194.
    Direct Link:
  • 77
    Pearlman DN, Clark MA, Rakowski W, Ehrich B. Screening for breast and cervical cancers: the importance of knowledge and perceived cancer survivability. Women Health. 1999; 28: 93112.
  • 78
    Eisner EJ, Zook EG, Goodman N, Macario E. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of women ages 65 and older on mammography screening and Medicare: results of a national survey. Women Health. 2002; 36: 118.
  • 79
    Rimer BK, Trock B, Engstrom PF, Lerman C, King E. Why do some women get regular mammograms? Am J Prev Med. 1991; 7: 6974.
  • 80
    Rakowski W, Dube CE, Marcus BH, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Abrams DB. Assessing elements of women's decisions about mammography. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 111118.
  • 81
    Glanz K, Resch N, Lerman C, Blake A, Gorchov PM, Rimer BK. Factors associated with adherence to breast cancer screening among working women. J Occup Med. 1992; 34: 10711078.
  • 82
    James AS, Campbell MK, Hudson MA. Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 529534.
  • 83
    Codori AM, Petersen GM, Miglioretti DL, Boyd P. Health beliefs and endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer: potential for cancer prevention. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 128136.
  • 84
    Vernon SW. Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 14061422.
  • 85
    Vernon SW. Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999: 101119.
  • 86
    Jenkins CN, Le T, McPhee SJ, Stewart S, Ha NT. Health care access and preventive care among Vietnamese immigrants: do traditional beliefs and practices pose barriers? Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43: 10491056.
  • 87
    O'Malley AS, Kerner J, Johnson AE, Mandelblatt J. Acculturation and breast cancer screening among Hispanic women in New York City. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 219227.
  • 88
    Timmins CL. The impact of language barriers on the health care of Latinos in the United States: a review of the literature and guidelines for practice. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002; 47: 8096.
  • 89
    Giuliano AR, Mokuau N, Hughes C, et al. Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. Ann Epidemiol. 2000; 10: S22S34.
  • 90
    Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999; 282: 583589.
  • 91
    Levy S, Dowling P, Boult L, Monroe A, McQuade W. The effect of physician and patient gender on preventive medicine practices in patients older than fifty. Fam Med. 1992; 24(1): 5861.
  • 92
    Seeff LC, Shapiro JA, Nadel MR. Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. J Fam Pract. 2002; 51: 761766.
  • 93
    Mayer-Oakes SA, Atchison KA, Matthias RE, De Jong FJ, Lubben J, Schweitzer SO. Mammography use in older women with regular physicians: what are the predictors? Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 4450.
  • 94
    Urban N, Anderson GL, Peacock S. Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use? Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 5055.
  • 95
    Kelaher M, Stellman JM. The impact of Medicare funding on the use of mammography among older women: implications for improving access to screening. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 658664.
  • 96
    Solanki G, Schauffler HH, Miller LS. The direct and indirect effects of cost-sharing on the use of preventive services. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34: 13311350.
  • 97
    Lohr KN, Brook RH, Kamberg CJ, et al. Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 1986; 24: S187.
  • 98
    Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O'Malley AS, et al. Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med. 1999; 28: 418425.
  • 99
    Lane DS, Zapka J, Breen N, Messina CR, Fotheringham DJ. A systems model of clinical preventive care: the case of breast cancer screening among older women. For the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 481493.
  • 100
    Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, Kanetsky P, Kao R. Targeting breast and cervical cancer screening to elderly poor black women: who will participate? The Harlem Study Team. Prev Med. 1993; 22: 2033.
  • 101
    Lemon S, Zapka J, Puleo E, Luckmann R, Chasan-Taber L. Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 12641272.
  • 102
    Cokkinides VE, Chao A, Smith RA, Vernon SW, Thun MJ. Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among U.S. adults, age 50 years and older. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 8591.
  • 103
    Schroy PC, Heeren T, Bliss CM, Pincus J, Wilson S, Prout M. Implementation of on-site screening sigmoidoscopy positively influences utilization by primary care providers. Gastroenterology. 1999; 117: 304311.
  • 104
    Lewis JD, Ginsberg GG, Hoops TC, Kochman ML, Bilker WB, Strom BL. Flexible sigmoidoscopy training and its impact on colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9: 420425.
  • 105
    Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR. Effectiveness of interventions designed to increase mammography use: a meta-analysis of provider-targeted strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 759767.
  • 106
    Yabroff KR, O'Malley A, Mangan P, Mandelblatt J. Inreach and outreach interventions to improve mammography use. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2001; 56: 166173, 188.
  • 107
    McKinney MM, Marconi KM. Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography. J Community Health. 1992; 17: 333349.
  • 108
    Lillquist PP. Breast cancer policy as a paradigm for other health prevention issues: analysis of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Mortality Prevention Act of 1990. J Health Soc Policy. 2001; 12: 1732.
  • 109
    [No authors listed.] Screening for colorectal cancer—United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999; 48: 116121.
  • 110
    Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, Harding GH. Financial incentive and the use of mammography among Hispanic migrants to the United States. Health Care Women Int. 1996; 17: 281291.
  • 111
    Kiefe CI, McKay SV, Halevy A, Brody BA. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154: 12171224.
  • 112
    Stoner TJ, Dowd B, Carr WP, Maldonado G, Church TR, Mandel J. Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial. Health Serv Res. 1998; 33: 1128.
  • 113
    Miller MF, Wong JG. Reducing financial barriers enhances the return rate of stool Hemoccult packets. Am J Med Sci. 1993; 306: 98100.
  • 114
    Shortell SM, Levin DZ, O'Brien JL, Hughes EF. Assessing the evidence on CQI: is the glass half empty or half full? Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1995; 40: 424.
  • 115
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. The state of managed care quality. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2001.
  • 116
    Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML, et al. Failure of a continuous quality improvement intervention to increase the delivery of preventive services. A randomized trial. Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3: 105115.
  • 117
    Magnan S, Solberg LI, Giles K, Kottke TE, Wheeler JW. Primary care, process improvement, and turmoil. J Ambul Care Manage. 1997; 20: 3238.
  • 118
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995; 274: 700705.
  • 119
    Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. J Fam Pract. 1995; 40: 162171.
  • 120
    Yarnall KS, Michener JL, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Increasing compliance with mammography recommendations: health assessment forms. J Fam Pract. 1993; 36: 5964.
  • 121
    Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986; 24: 659666.
  • 122
    Cheney C, Ramsdell JW. Effect of medical records' checklists on implementation of periodic health measures. Am J Med. 1987; 83: 129136.
  • 123
    Yarnall KS, Rimer BK, Hynes D, et al. Computerized prompts for cancer screening in a community health center. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998; 11: 96104.
  • 124
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Fordham D, Rodnick JE, Osborn EH. Promoting cancer prevention activities by primary care physicians. Results of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1991; 266: 538544.
  • 125
    Harris RP, O'Malley MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med. 1990; 6: 145152.
  • 126
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA. Promoting screening mammography in inner-city settings. The sustained effectiveness of computerized reminders in a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 1997; 35: 921931.
  • 127
    Tape TG, Campbell JR. Computerized medical records and preventive health care: success depends on many factors. Am J Med. 1993; 94: 619625.
  • 128
    Kupets R, Covens A. Strategies for the implementation of cervical and breast cancer screening of women by primary care physicians. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 83: 186197.
  • 129
    Meissner HI, Breen N, Coyne C, Legler JM, Green DT, Edwards BK. Breast and cervical cancer screening interventions: an assessment of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998; 7: 951961.
  • 130
    Hillman AL, Pauly MV, Kerstein JJ. How do financial incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of health maintenance organizations? N Engl J Med. 1989; 321: 8692.
  • 131
    Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1992; 267: 16241630.
  • 132
    Hillman AL, Ripley K, Goldfarb N, Nuamah I, Weiner J, Lusk E. Physician financial incentives and feedback: failure to increase cancer screening in Medicaid managed care. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 16991701.
  • 133
    Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 749757.
  • 134
    Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza JI. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; 1: CD002943.
  • 135
    Peterson SK, Vernon SW. A review of patient and physician adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2000; 11: 5872.
  • 136
    Tseng DS, Cox E, Plane MB, Hla KM. Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 563568.
  • 137
    Miller SM, Siejak KK, Schroeder CM, Lerman C, Hernandez E, Helm CW. Enhancing adherence following abnormal Pap smears among low-income minority women: a preventive telephone counseling strategy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 703708.
  • 138
    Bastani R, Yabroff KR, Myers RE, Glenn B. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl 5): XXXXXX.
  • 139
    Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Halabi S, Strigo TS. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women? Am J Prev Med. 2000; 18: 110.
  • 140
    Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 233242.
  • 141
    Saywell RM Jr., Champion VL, Skinner CS, McQuillen D, Martin D, Maraj M. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening. Prev Med. 1999; 29: 374382.
  • 142
    Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136: 641651.
  • 143
    Pignone M, Harris R, Kinsinger L. Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000; 133: 761769.
  • 144
    Rimer BK, Resch N, King E, et al. Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep. 1992; 107: 369380.
  • 145
    Kessler HB, Rimer BK, Devine PJ, Gatenby RA, Engstrom PF. Corporate-sponsored breast cancer screening at the work site: results of a statewide program. Radiology. 1991; 179: 107110.
  • 146
    Wolk RB. Hidden costs of mobile mammography: is subsidization necessary? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158: 12431245.
  • 147
    Feig SA. Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000; 38: 843852.
  • 148
    Hulscher ME, Wensing M, van Der WT, Grol R. Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001; 1: CD000362.
  • 149
    Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 5971.
  • 150
    Longest BB Jr. Health policy making in the United States. 2nd edition. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 1998.
  • 151
    Thompson GB, Kessler LG, Boss LP. Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 15411543.
  • 152
    McDonough JE. Using and misusing anecdote in policy making. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 207212.
  • 153
    Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al. American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of cervical neoplasia and cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 342362.
  • 154
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002. Available from URL:[accessed August 1, 2003].
  • 155
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical practice and rationale. J Natl Compr Cancer Network. 2003; 1: 7293.
  • 156
    Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 132141.
  • 157
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Aita VA, Flocke SA, Stange KC. Primary care practice organization and preventive services delivery: a qualitative analysis. J Fam Pract. 1998; 46: 403409.
  • 158
    Lantz PM, Richardson LC, Sever LE, et al. Mass screening in low-income populations: the challenges of securing diagnostic and treatment services in a national cancer screening program. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000; 25: 451471.
  • 159
    Henson RM, Wyatt SW, Lee NC. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996; 2: 3647.
  • 160
    American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2002. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2002.
  • 161
    Grimes DA, Economy KE. Primary prevention of gynecologic cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 227235.
  • 162
    Baron JA, Beach M, Mandel JS, et al. Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 101107.
  • 163
    Baron JA, Cole BF, Sandler RS, et al. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 891899.
  • 164
    Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 16251638.
  • 165
    Peters U, Sinha R, Chatterjee N, et al. Dietary fibre and colorectal adenoma in a colorectal cancer early detection programme. Lancet. 2003; 361: 14911495.
  • 166
    Bingham SA, Day NE, Luben R, et al. Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study. Lancet. 2003; 361: 1496– 1501.
  • 167
    Burack RC, Gimotty PA, Simon M, Moncrease A, Dews P. The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 547554.
  • 168
    Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 635641.
  • 169
    Taplin SH, Mandelson MT, Anderman C, et al. Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997; 6: 625631.
  • 170
    Somkin CP, Hiatt RA, Hurley LB, Gruskin E, Ackerson L, Larson P. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157: 16581664.
  • 171
    Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr., Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 653657.
  • 172
    Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM. Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl 5): XXXXXX.
  • 173
    Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro J, Warnecke RB. Some methodological lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl 5): XXXXXX.
  • 174
    Erwin DO, Spatz TS, Stotts RC, Hollenberg JA. Increasing mammography practice by African American women. Cancer Pract. 1999; 7: 7885.
  • 175
    Yabroff KR, Kerner JF, Mandelblatt JS. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening. Prev Med. 2000; 31: 429439.
  • 176
    Blumenthal DS, Lukomnik JE, Hawkins DR Jr. A proposal to provide care to the uninsured through a network of community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1993; 4: 272279.
  • 177
    Davis SK, Collins KS, Hall A. Community health centers in a changing U.S. health care system. Policy Brief Commonw Fund. 1999: 113.
  • 178
    Braddock CH III. Advancing the cause of informed consent: moving from disclosure to understanding. Am J Med. 1998; 105: 354355.
  • 179
    Barry MJ. Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better? JAMA. 1999; 282: 23562357.
  • 180
    Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999; 282: 23132320.
  • 181
    Kravitz RL, Bell RA, Azari R, Kelly-Reif S, Krupat E, Thom DH. Direct observation of requests for clinical services in office practice: what do patients want and do they get it? Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 16731681.
  • 182
    Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 180185.
  • 183
    O'Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA. 2000; 284: 19621964.
  • 184
    Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 17271734.
  • 185
    Grover F Jr., Wu HD, Blanford C, Holcomb S, Tidler D. Computer-using patients want Internet services from family physicians. J Fam Pract. 2002; 51: 570572.
  • 186
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th edition. New York: Free Press, 1995.
  • 187
    Kaluzny AD, Konrad TR, McLaughlin CP. Organizational strategies for implementing clinical guidelines. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995; 21: 347351.
  • 188
    Rogers EM. Lessons for guidelines from the diffusion of innovations. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995; 21: 324328.
  • 189
    Manos MM, Kinney WK, Hurley LB, et al. Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. JAMA. 1999; 281: 16051610.
  • 190
    Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, et al. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 16451651.
  • 191
    NassSJ, HendersonIC, LashofJC, editors. Mammography and beyond: developing technologies for the early detection of breast cancer. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, 2001.
  • 192
    Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA. 2003; 289: 12881296.
  • 193
    Traverso G, Shuber A, Levin B, et al. Detection of APC mutations in fecal DNA from patients with colorectal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 311320.
  • 194
    Frattini M, Balestra D, Pilotti S, Bertario L, Pierotti MA. Tumor location and detection of k-ras mutations in stool from colorectal cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 7273.
  • 195
    Greenwald P, Cullen JW, McKenna JW. Cancer prevention and control: from research through applications. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1987; 79: 389400.
  • 196
    Hiatt RA, Rimer BK. A new strategy for cancer control research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 957964.
  • 197
    Gusmano MK, Fairbrother G, Park H. Exploring the limits of the safety net: community health centers and care for the uninsured. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 188194.
  • 198
    Iglehart JK. Changing health insurance trends. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 956962.
  • 199
    Solberg LI, Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Magnan S. Improving prevention is difficult. Eff Clin Pract. 2000; 3: 153155.
  • 200
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stange KC. Understanding practice from the ground up. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50: 881887.
  • 201
    Brach C, Sanches L, Young D, et al. Wrestling with typology: penetrating the “black box” of managed care by focusing on health care system characteristics. Med Care Res Rev. 2000; 57 (Suppl 2): 93115.
  • 202
    Weiner JP, de Lissovoy G. Razing a Tower of Babel: a taxonomy for managed care and health insurance plans. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993; 18: 75103.
  • 203
    Werner RM, Alexander GC, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA. The “hassle factor”: what motivates physicians to manipulate reimbursement rules? Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162: 11341139.
  • 204
    Office for Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Protecting personal health information in research: understanding the HIPAA privacy rule. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2003.
  • 205
    Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000; 283: 25792584.
  • 206
    Bierman AS, Lurie N, Collins KS, Eisenberg JM. Addressing racial and ethnic barriers to effective health care: the need for better data. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21: 91102.
  • 207
    Swallen KC, Glaser SL, Stewart SL, West DW, Jenkins CN, McPhee SJ. Accuracy of racial classification of Vietnamese patients in a population-based cancer registry. Ethn Dis. 1998; 8: 218227.
  • 208
    Mays VM, Ponce NA, Washington DL, Cochran SD. Classification of race and ethnicity: implications for public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2003; 24: 83110.
  • 209
    Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Perez-Stable EJ, et al. Pathways to early cancer detection in the multiethnic population of the San Francisco Bay area. Health Educ Q. 1996; 23: S10S27.
  • 210
    Wagner TH. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 6470.
  • 211
    Sin JP, St Leger AS. Interventions to increase breast screening uptake: do they make any difference? J Med Screen. 1999; 6: 170181.
  • 212
    Ratner PA, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Cook R, Lovato CY. A meta-analysis of mammography screening promotion. Cancer Detect Prev. 2001; 25: 147160.
  • 213
    Rimer B, Meissner H, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne C. Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: SchneidermanN, SpeersMA, SilvaJM, TomesH, GentryJH, editors. Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. 1st edition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001: 177201.
  • 214
    Forbes C, Jepson R, Martin-Hirsch P. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; 3: CD002834.
  • 215
    Hahn D, Benger M. Implementation of a systematic health maintenance protocol in a private practice. J Fam Pract. 1990; 31: 492502; discussion 502–494.
  • 216
    McPhee S, Detmer W. Office-based interventions to improve delivery of cancer prevention services by primary care physicians. Cancer. 1993; 72(3 Suppl ): 11001112.
  • 217
    Yano EM, Fink A, Hirsch SH, Robbins AS, Rubenstein LV. Helping practices reach primary care goals: lessons from the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155: 11461156.
  • 218
    Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L. A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996; 3: 399409.
  • 219
    Snell J, Buck E. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 702707.
  • 220
    Hiatt RA. Behavioral research contributions and needs in cancer prevention and control: adherence to cancer screening advice. Prev Med. 1997; 26(5 Pt 2): S11S18.
  • 221
    Dickey LL, Gemson DH, Carney P. Office system interventions supporting primary care-based health behavior change counseling. Am J Prev Med. 1999; 17: 299308.
  • 222
    Hulscher ME, Wensing M, Grol RP, van der Weijden T, van Weel C. Interventions to improve the delivery of preventive services in primary care. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 737746.
  • 223
    Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, Blumenthal D, Boren SA, Brown GD. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 301308.
  • 224
    McBride CM, Rimer BK. Using the telephone to improve health behavior and health service delivery. Patient Educ Couns. 1999; 37: 318.
  • 225
    Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001; 39: II-2II-45.