Lessons learned from community-based cancer screening intervention research

Authors

  • Rena J. Pasick Dr.P.H.,

    Corresponding author
    1. Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Education and Outreach, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California–San Francisco, 74 New Montgomery Street, Suite 200, Box 0981, San Francisco, CA 94143-0981
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Fax: (415) 597-4667

  • Robert A. Hiatt M.D., Ph.D.,

    1. Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Electra D. Paskett Ph.D.

    1. Division of Epidemiology and Biometrics, School of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Behaviors associated with cancer screening have been the focus of intensive research over the past 2 decades, primarily in the form of intervention trials to improve screening based in both clinical and community settings. Meta-analyses and literature reviews have synthesized and organized the resulting literature. From the accumulated work, this review distilled lessons learned from cancer screening intervention research in community settings. The authors posed the question, “What do we know about the development of effective community-based interventions (the level of good over harm achieved in real-world conditions)?” Framed around the concept of focal points (the simultaneous combination of target population, behavioral objective, and setting for an intervention), 13 lessons were derived. One lesson was cross-cutting, and the other lessons addressed the three focal-point components and the major intervention categories (access-enhancing strategies, mass media, small media, one-on-one and small-group education, and combinations of these categories). To build more systematically on existing research, recommendations are made for new directions in basic behavioral and intervention research. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

Ancillary