SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Zapka JG, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004; 101 (5 Suppl): 000000.
  • 2
    National Cancer Institute. Designing for dissemination: conference summary report. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, 2002. Available from URL: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/d4d/d4d_conf_sum_report.pdf. [accessed August 4, 2003].
  • 3
    Balas EA. From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine. Pediatric Annals. 1998; 27: 581584.
  • 4
    Ellis P, Robinson P, Cilisha D, et al. Diffusion and dissemination of evidence-based cancer control interventions. Prepared by McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center for Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003. Available from URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/canconinv.htm [accessed March 3, 2004].
  • 5
    Rimer BK, Meissner H, Breen N, Legler J, Coyne CA. Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: SchneidermanN, SpeersMA, SilvaJM, TomesH, GentryJH, editors. Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2001: 177201.
  • 6
    Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2003; 27: 312.
  • 7
    Norton PG, Dunn EV, Bain J, et al. Guidelines for the dissemination of new information discovered by researchers. In: DunnEV, NortonPG, StewartM, TudiverF, editors. Disseminating research/changing practice. Volume 6: Research methods in primary care. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994: 8796.
  • 8
    National Cancer Institute. New web-based tools for developing comprehensive cancer control programs released. 2003. Available from URL: http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov [accessed November 24, 2003].
  • 9
    Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001; 285: 19871991.
  • 10
    The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003. Available from URL: www.cochrane.org [accessed March 22, 2004].
  • 11
    Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 12611267.
  • 12
    Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med. 1986; 15: 451474.
  • 13
    Greenwald P, Cullen JW. The new emphasis in cancer control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985; 74: 543551.
  • 14
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001. Available from URL: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html/index.html [accessed November 26, 2003].
  • 15
    Morra ME, Bettinghaus EP, Marcus AC, Mazan KD, Nealon EO, Van Nevel JP. The first 15 years: what has been learned about the Cancer Information Service and the implications for the future. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993; 14: 177185.
  • 16
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th edition. New York: Free Press, 1995.
  • 17
    Orlandi MA, Landers C, Weston R, Haley N. Diffusion of health promotion innovations. In: GlanzK, LewisFM, RimerBK, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1990: 270286.
  • 18
    Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro J, Warnecke RB. Some methodological lessons learned from cancer screening research. Cancer. 2004; 101: 000000.
  • 19
    Bourke L. Participatory research in breast cancer: a case study in regional Victoria. Contemp Nurse. 2002; 12: 246252.
  • 20
    Green LW. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behav. 2001; 25: 165178.
  • 21
    Battelle Centers for Public Health. Evaluation protocol, consultation, and technical assistance for the replication and dissemination of effective breast and cervical cancer health education interventions: final report. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001.
  • 22
    Yabroff KR, Mandelblatt JS. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 749757.
  • 23
    Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974; 2: 328335.
  • 24
    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997.
  • 25
    Hislop TG, Deschamps M, Teh C, et al. Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among Chinese Canadian women. Can J Public Health. 2003; 94: 6873.
  • 26
    Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health promotion planning: an educational and ecological approach. 3rd edition. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 27
    Meissner HI, Breen N, Coyne C, Legler JM, Green DT, Edwards BK. Breast and cervical cancer screening interventions: an assessment of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998; 7: 951961.
  • 28
    Oldenburg B, Parcel GS. Diffusion of innovations. In: GlanzK, RimerBK, LewisFM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 3rd edition. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002: 312334.
  • 29
    Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 23: 6269.
  • 30
    RE-AIM. 2004. Available from URL: http://www.re-aim.org [accessed February 3, 2004].
  • 31
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 13221327.
  • 32
    Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 5971.
  • 33
    Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
  • 34
    Breslow L. Social ecological strategies for promoting healthy lifestyles. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 253257.
  • 35
    Higgins DL, Maciak B, Metzler M. CDC Urban Research Centers: community-based participatory research to improve the health of urban communities. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001; 10: 915.
  • 36
    Green LW, Richard L, Potvin L. Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 270281.
  • 37
    Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 247251.
  • 38
    Higgins DL, Metzler M. Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings. J Urban Health. 2001; 78: 488494.
  • 39
    Grzywacz JG, Fuqua J. The social ecology of health: leverage points and linkages. Behav Med. 2000; 26: 101115.
  • 40
    Orleans CT, Barker DC, Kaufman NJ, Marx JF. Helping pregnant smokers quit: meeting the challenge in the next decade. Tob Control. 2000; 9 (Suppl 3): III6III11.
  • 41
    Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12: 413.
  • 42
    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996; 74: 511544.
  • 43
    Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001; 27: 6380.
  • 44
    Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993; 703: 226235.
  • 45
    Green LW, Stoto MA. Linking research and public health practice: a vision for health promotion and disease prevention research. Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13: 58.
  • 46
    Kazdin AE. Research design in clinical psychology. 2nd edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1992.
  • 47
    Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
  • 48
    Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003; 290: 16241632.
  • 49
    Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS, Goldstein MG, Prochaska JO, Velicer W. Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped care and matching model. Ann Behav Med. 1996; 18: 290304.
  • 50
    Valanis BG, Glasgow RE, Mullooly J, et al. Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and Pap tests. Prev Med. 2002; 34: 4050.
  • 51
    Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, Vogt TM. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22: 223228.
  • 52
    Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Ludman E, et al. Testing reminder and motivational telephone calls to increase screening mammography: a randomized study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 233242.
  • 53
    Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluations of the 5-A-Day projects. Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27: 157166.
  • 54
    Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
  • 55
    Rakowski W. The potential variances of tailoring in health behavior interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1999; 21: 284289.
  • 56
    Rakowski WR, Breslau E. Perspectives on behavioral and social science research on cancer screening. Cancer. 2004; 101 (Suppl): 000000.
  • 57
    Scott TL, Wong FL, Rimer BK. Dissemination of an evidence-based intervention manual to improve managed care mammography rates. Manag Care Interface. 1999; 12: 8390.
  • 58
    Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 134: 663694. Available from URL: www.consort-statement.org. [accessed November 7, 2003].
  • 59
    The Conservation Company and Public/Private Ventures. Building from strength: replication as a strategy for expanding social programs that work. Philadelphia: Replication and Expansion Unit of Public/Private Ventures, 1994.