SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2003. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2003.
  • 2
    Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2000. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2003.
  • 3
    Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1996. CA Cancer J Clin. 1996; 46: 527.
  • 4
    National Cancer Institute. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 1993.
  • 5
    Miller B, Ries L, Hankey B, Kosary C, Edwards B. Cancer statistics review: 1973-1989. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 1992.
  • 6
    Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985; 325: 829832.
  • 7
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002.
  • 8
    Smart CR, Hendrick RE, Rutledge JH III, Smith RA. Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40-49 years: current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Cancer. 1995; 75: 16191626.
  • 9
    Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years. Int J Cancer. 1996; 68: 693699.
  • 10
    Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 22: 8792.
  • 11
    Freedman GF, Anderson PR, Goldstein LJ, et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older. Cancer. 2003; 98: 918925.
  • 12
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: understanding and improving health (2nd edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000.
  • 13
    Marchant DJ, Sutton SM. Use of mammography—United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990; 39: 621630.
  • 14
    [No author listed]. Recent trends in mortality rates for 4 major cancers, by sex and race/ethnicity—United States 1990-1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51: 4953.
  • 15
    Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein A. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 326331.
  • 16
    Glanz K, Croyle RT, Chollette VY, Pinn VW. Cancer-related health disparities in women. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 292298.
  • 17
    National Cancer Institute. Researching and reducing cancer-related health disparities. Rockville, MD: Center to Reduce Health Disparities, National Cancer Institute, 2004.
  • 18
    O'Malley MS, Earp JA, Harris RP. Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 782786.
  • 19
    Dignan MB, Michielutte R, Wells HB, et al. Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian women in North Carolina. Health Educ Res. 1998; 13: 545556.
  • 20
    Giuliano A, Papenfuss M, de Guernsey de Zapien J, Tilousi S, Nuvayestewa L. Breast cancer screening among Southwest American Indian women living on-reservation. Prev Med. 1998; 27: 135143.
  • 21
    U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. United States census, 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2001.
  • 22
    Bonferroni CE. [ Statistical theory of classes and calculation of probabilities]. Pub R Ist Superiore Sci Econ Commerc Firenze. 1936; 8: 3662.
  • 23
    SAS Institute. SAS/STAT version 8.2 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2001.
  • 24
    Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening. Lancet. 1999; 353: 19031908.
  • 25
    Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Bowlin SJ, et al. An ecological study of the effectiveness of mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality. Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 281284.
  • 26
    Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer. 1995; 75: 25072517.
  • 27
    Tornberg S, Carstensen J, Hakulinen T, Lenner P, Hatschek T, Lundgren B. Evaluation of the effect on breast cancer mortality of population-based mammography screening programmes. J Med Screen. 1994; 1: 184187.
  • 28
    Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 17041713.
  • 29
    Ratner PA, Bottorff JL, Johnson JL, Cook R, Lovato CY. A meta-analysis of mammography screening promotion. Cancer Detect Prev. 2001; 25: 147160.
  • 30
    [No author listed]. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. JAMA. 1990; 264: 5458.
  • 31
    Harris R, Leininger L. Clinical strategies for breast cancer screening: weighing and using the evidence. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122: 539547.
  • 32
    Paskett ED, Tatum CM, D'Agostino RJ, et al. Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 453459.
  • 33
    Brenes GA, Paskett ED. Factors related to perceptions of breast cancer risk among low income women. Clin J Womens Health. 2001; 1: 132138.
  • 34
    Anderson LM, May DS. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal screening increased in the United States? Am J Public Health. 1995; 83: 5360.
  • 35
    Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003; 47: 15281540.
  • 36
    Rakowski W, Pearlman DN, Rimer B, Ehrich B. Correlates of screening mammography among women from high and low socioeconomic groups. Prev Med. 1995; 24: 149158.
  • 37
    Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 5360.
  • 38
    Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath CW Jr. Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 8290.
  • 39
    Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from the National Health Interview Surveys: past, present and future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 18371846.
  • 40
    Silver Wallace L, Gupta R. Predictors of screening for breast and colorectal cancer among middle-aged women. Fam Med. 2003; 35: 349354.
  • 41
    Brant JM, Fallsdown D, Iverson ML. The evolution of a breast health program for Plains Indian women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999; 26: 731739.
  • 42
    Gilliland FD, Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Stauber P, Key CR. Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico, 1994-1997. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152: 432437.
  • 43
    Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Blackman DK. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States, 1992-1997. Prev Med. 1999; 29: 287295.
  • 44
    Burhansstipanov L, Dignan MB, Wound DB, Tenney M, Vigil G. Native American recruitment into breast cancer screening: the NAWWA project. J Cancer Educ. 2000; 15: 2832.