Fax: 011 (49) 5371871608
Review Article
A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance†
Article first published online: 20 DEC 2004
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20786
Copyright © 2004 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kuehn, T., Bembenek, A., Decker, T., Munz, D. L., Sautter-Bihl, M.-L., Untch, M., Wallwiener, D. and For the Consensus Committee of the German Society of Senology (2005), A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance. Cancer, 103: 451–461. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20786
- †
See related editorial on pages 444–6, this issue.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 20 DEC 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Revised: 19 SEP 2004
- Manuscript Received: 15 JUL 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- breast carcinoma;
- sentinel lymph node biopsy;
- quality assurance;
- consensus panel
Abstract
The development of standardized and reproducible clinical pathways is an important precondition for quality assurance in medicine, especially if a new method has not yet been ultimately validated. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted new surgical procedure in the treatment of early breast carcinoma. However, numerous steps of the method and details of the technique are not standardized and, thus, hamper quality assurance for SLNB. The German Society of Senology appointed an interdisciplinary consensus committee to work out guidelines for the standardized performance and quality-assured implementation of SLNB on a nationwide, homogeneous standard. The committee consisted of surgeons, gynecologists, radiooncologists, nuclear physicians, oncologists, and pathologists. Relevant questions related to patient selection, lymphatic mapping, surgery, histopathologic work-up, further local and systemic treatment decisions, patient information, training, and follow-up were evaluated with respect to clinical evidence, objectivity, and reproducibility. Clinical pathways were developed on the basis of this analysis. Requirements to the performing institutions and surgeons were defined. Cancer 2005. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)