Fax: (203) 688-4092
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer
Article first published online: 13 DEC 2004
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20792
Copyright © 2004 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Gross, C. P., Filardo, G., Mayne, S. T. and Krumholz, H. M. (2005), The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer, 103: 483–491. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20792
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 13 DEC 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Revised: 4 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Received: 23 JUL 2004
Funded by
- Cancer Prevention, Control, and Population Sciences Career Development Award. Grant Number: 1K07CA-90402
- Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale. Grant Number: P30AG21342
REFERENCES
- 1, . Concerns of special populations. Cancer. 1997; 80: 1258–1260.Direct Link:
- 2
- 3. Aging and cancer: geriatric oncology—keynote address to the integrating geriatrics into oncology education. Cancer. 1997; 80: 1270–1272.Direct Link:
- 4, , , , , . Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials. Cancer. 1994; 74: 2208–2214.Direct Link:
- 5. Cancer burden in the aged: an epidemiologic and demographic overview. Cancer. 1997; 80: 1273–1283.
- 6, , . Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA. 2004; 291(22): 2720–2726.
- 7, , , , . Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 2061–2067.
- 8, , , et al. Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 1383–1389.
- 9. Disaggregating the effects of race and poverty on breast cancer outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 471–473.
- 10, , , et al. Histological characteristics of breast carcinoma in blacks and whites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994; 3: 127–135.
- 11, , , . Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 86: 705–712.
- 12. Race and cancer genetics: lessons from BRCA1. Oncology (Huntingt). 2002; 16: 108–112; discussion, 113, 118–119.
- 13
- 14, , , et al. Barriers to clinical trial participation by older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 2268–2275.
- 15, , , et al. The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 1170–1175.
- 16, , . Prognosis after rectal cancer in blacks and whites participating in adjuvant therapy randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 413–420.
- 17, , , , . Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14: 761–766.
- 18, , , , . Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: the impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type. Am J Public Health. 1991; 81: 646–649.
- 19, , , et al. Effects of health insurance and race on early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1409–1415.
- 20, , . Race, socioeconomic status, and breast carcinoma in the U.S: what have we learned from clinical studies? Cancer. 2002; 95: 1988–1999.Direct Link:
- 21, , . Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 490–496.
- 22, , , , , . Age does not predict breast cancer outcome. Arch Surg. 1994; 129: 483–487; discussion, 487–488.
- 23, , , , , . Barriers to eligibility and enrollment among older women in a clinical trial on osteoporosis: effects of ethnicity and SES. J Aging Health. 2004; 16: 426–443.
- 24, , , . Characteristics of men most likely to respond to an invitation to be screened. Am J Public Health. 1979; 69: 1011–1015.
- 25
- 26Anonymous. Cancer facts and figures—1999. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1999.
- 27National Cancer Institute. Clinical Data System Update Version 3.0. National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, June, 2003. Available from URL: http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/cdus.html. vol. 2002 [accessed 30 Nov 04].
- 28, , , , , . SEER cancer statistics review. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 1997.
- 29, , , , . Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor related database. Med Care. 1993; 31: 732–748.
- 30, , , , . Overview of SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002; 40(Suppl): IV3–IV18.
- 31United States Department of the Census. 2000 US census. Available from URL: http://www.census.gov/support/2000/SF3/, 2000 [accessed 30 Nov 04].
- 32, , , , . Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 Suppl ): IV19–IV25.
- 33Interstudy Publications. County surveyor database 3.0. St. Paul: Interstudy Publications, 2003.
- 34, , . Relationship between market competition and activities and attitudes of medical school faculty. JAMA. 1997; 278: 222–226.
- 35, , , , . Relationship between National Institutes of Health research awards to US medical schools and managed care market penetration. JAMA. 1997; 278: 217–221.
- 36, , , . HMO market structure and performance. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997; 16: 75–84.
- 37, . The impact of HMO penetration on the rate of hospital cost inflation. Inquiry. 1997; 34: 205–216.
- 38Bridger Systems, Inc. ZipFinder Deluxe 4.0. Bozemam, MT: Bridger Systems, Inc., 2001.
- 39Quality Resource Systems. Area resource file, vol. 2003. Available from URL: http://www.arfsys.com/ [accessed 30 Nov 04].
- 40SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 6, volumes 1 and 2. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc., 1989.
- 41Stata Corporation. Stata SS, release: 8.0 reference manual. Volume 4. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2004.
- 42, , , , , . Influence of race, clinical, and other socio-demographic features on trial participation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 304–309.
- 43, , , et al. Efficacy of tonsillectomy for recurrent throat infection in severely affected children. Results of parallel randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1984; 310: 674–683.
- 44, , , , , . Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Registry. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2795–2802.
- 45, , , . Subject selection biases in clinical trials: data from a multicenter schizophrenia treatment study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1994; 16: 170–176.
- 46, , , et al. Clinical trial enrollers vs. nonenrollers: the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT) project. Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 46–59.
- 47, , , et al. Participation in research and access to experimental treatments by HIV-infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1373–1382.
- 48
- 49New Jersey Association of Health Plans. Questions and answers about agreement to provide health insurance converage for cancer clinical trials by the New Jersey working group to improve cancer clinical trials. Available from URL: http://www.state.nj.us/health/ccr/resourcebook/rb99k.htm 2004 [accessed 30 Nov 04].
- 50. Barriers to clinical trials. Part I: reimbursement problems. Cancer. 1994; 74: 2662–2665.Direct Link:
- 51Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare coverage: clinical trials. Available from URL: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/coverage/8d2.as [accessed 30 Nov 2004].
- 52National Cancer Institute. Cancer trial barriers falling for people over 65. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/developments/barriers-falling010. National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Aging, 2004 [accessed 30 Nov 2004].
- 53National Institutes of Health. NIH funds eight new grants focused on aging and cancer. Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/aginggrants [accessed 30 Nov 2004].
- 54, , , et al. Factors associated with breast cancer clinical trials participation and enrollment at a large academic medical center. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 2046–2052.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)