Fax: (704) 355-5619
Communication
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
On the use and abuse of X in the TNM classification
Article first published online: 20 DEC 2004
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20808
Copyright © 2004 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Greene, F. L., Brierley, J., O'Sullivan, B., Sobin, L. H. and Wittekind, C. (2005), On the use and abuse of X in the TNM classification. Cancer, 103: 647–649. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20808
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 20 DEC 2004
- Manuscript Revised: 14 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 14 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Received: 27 SEP 2004
REFERENCES
- 1. At last—worldwide agreement on the staging of cancer. Arch Surg. 1987; 122: 1235–1239.
- 2. TNM: principles, history, and relation to other prognostic factors. Cancer. 2001; 91: 1589–1592.Direct Link:
- 3SobinLH, WittekindCL, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002.
- 4GreeneFL, PageDL, FlemingID, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
- 5WittekindCL, GreeneFL, HensonDE, et al., editors. TNM supplement. A commentary on uniform use, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003.
- 6, , , et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 2912–2919.
- 7. Lymph node recoveries from 2,427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26: 179–189.
- 8, , , . Evaluation of the 5th edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer: improved prognostic value. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84: 64–71.
- 9, . TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph nodes for pN0. Cancer. 2001; 92: 452.Direct Link:
- 10, , , et al. Suspected liver metastases. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology. 2000; 215(Suppl): 213–224.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)