• 1
    Leung K. A system model of quality of life for rehabilitation and psychosocial care. ISOQOL Newsletter [serial online] 2002, 7: 4–5. Available from URL: [accessed April 30, 2004].
  • 2
    Wan G, Counte M, Cella D. The influence of personal expectations on cancer patients' reports of health related quality of life. Psychooncology. 1997; 6: 111.
  • 3
    Wan G, Counte M, Cella D, et al. The impact of socio-cultural and clinical factors on health-related quality of life reports among Hispanic and African-American cancer patients. J Outcome Meas. 1999; 3: 200215.
  • 4
    Allison PJ, Locker D, Wood-Dauphinee S, Black M, Feine JS. Correlates of health-related quality of life in upper aerodigestive tract cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 713722.
  • 5
    Holland JC, Passik S, Kash K, et al. The role of religious and spiritual beliefs in coping with malignant melanoma. Psychooncology. 1999; 8: 1426.
  • 6
    Breitbart W. Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality- and meaning-centered group psychotherapy interventions in advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2002; 10: 272280.
  • 7
    Koenig H, Pargament KI, Nielsen J. Religious coping and health status in medically ill hospitalized older adults. J Ment Nerv Dis. 1998; 189: 513521.
  • 8
    Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Mo M, Cella D. A case for including spirituality in quality of life measurement in oncology. Psychooncology. 1999; 8: 417428.
  • 9
    Holland JC, Kash K, Passik S, et al. A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in life-threatening illness. Psychooncology. 1998; 7: 460469.
  • 10
    Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med. 2002; 24: 4958.
  • 11
    SobinLH, WittekindCh, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
  • 12
    Zubrod CG, Schneiderman M, Frei E, et al. Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chron Dis. 1960; 11: 733.
  • 13
    McNair M, Lorr M, Droppleman Leo. Manual of the Profile of Mood States. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1992.
  • 14
    Cella D, Tulsky D, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993; 11: 570579.
  • 15
    Cella D, Hernandez L, Bonomi AE, et al. Spanish language translation and initial validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Quality of Life instrument. Med Care. 1998; 36: 14071418.
  • 16
    Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA, et al. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Quality of Life measurement system. Qual Life Res. 1996; 5: 309320.
  • 17
    Dapueto JJ, Francolino C, Gotta I, et al. Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Questionnaire (FACT-G) Version 2 in a Spanish speaking population. Psychooncology. 2001; 10: 8892.
  • 18
    Dapueto JJ, Francolino C, Servente L, et al. Evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) Spanish Version 4 in South America: classic psychometric and item response theory analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003; 1: 32. Available from URL [accessed January 10, 2005].
  • 19
    Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd edition. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1988.
  • 20
    Mandelblatt JS, Edge SB, Meropol NJ, et al. Predictors of long-term survival in older breast cancer survivors: perceptions vs. patterns of care. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 855863.
  • 21
    Ganz PA, Greendale GA, Petersen L, Kahn B, Bower JE. Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 41844193.
  • 22
    Calman K. Definitions and dimensions of quality of life. In: AaronsonNK, BeckmannJH, editors. The quality of life of cancer patients. New York: Raven Press, 1987: 111.
  • 23
    Maslow AH. El hombre autorealizado. Hacia una Psicología del ser [Toward a psychology of being]. Barcelona: Kairos, 1974.
  • 24
    Kosmin BA, Mayer E, Keysar A. American religious identification survey 2001 [monograph online]. New York: The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 2001. Available from URL: [accessed April 30, 2004].
  • 25
    Da Costa N, Kerber G, Mieres P. Creencias y religiones. La religiosidad de los montevideanos al fin del milenio. [Beliefs and religions of Montevideons at the end of the millennium]. Montevideo: Editorial Trilce, 1996.
  • 26
    FACTUM. Encuesta FACTUM de Opinión Pública: entre devotos y no devotos [FACTUM public opinion poll: devotees vs. non-devotees]. [monograph online]. Montevideo: FACTUM Digital, 2000. Available from URL: [accessed November 20, 2003].
  • 27
    Anderson JP, Bush JW, Berry CC. Classifying function for health outcome and quality-of-life evaluation. Med Care. 1986; 24: 454469.
  • 28
    Chambers LW, Haight M, Norman G, MacDonald L. Sensitivity to change and the effect of mode of administration on health status measurement. Med Care. 1987; 25: 470480.
  • 29
    Kornblith AB, Anderson J, Cella DF, et al. Quality of life assessment of Hodgkin's disease survivors: a model for cooperative clinical trials. Oncology. 1990; 4: 93101.
  • 30
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 365376.
  • 31
    Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Juniper E, et al. Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 529534.
  • 32
    Fowler FJ, Roman AM, Zhu XC. Mode effects in a survey of Medicare prostate surgery patients. Proc Surv Methods Section Am Sociol Assoc, 1993: 730735.
  • 33
    McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 Health Survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994; 32: 551567.
  • 34
    Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Samsa GP, Landsman PB. Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 135140.
  • 35
    Wu AW, Jacobson DL, Berzon RA, et al. The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS. Qual Life Res. 1997; 6: 310.
  • 36
    Hochstim J. A critical comparison of three strategies of collecting data from households. J Am StatAssoc. 1967; 62: 976989.
  • 37
    Mangione T, Hingson R, Barret J. Collecting sensitive data: a comparison of three survey strategies. Sociol Method Res. 1982; 10: 337346.
  • 38
    Groves RM. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
  • 39
    Fowler FJ. Survey research methods 2nd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
  • 40
    Fowler FJ Jr. Data collection methods. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996: 381386.
  • 41
    Tchekmedyian S, Hickman M, Shau J, Greco A, Aisner J. Treatment of cancer anorexia with megestrol acetate: impact on quality of life. Oncology. 1990; 4: 185193.