Fax: (011) 49 64212866367
Metaanalysis of the significance of matrix metalloproteinases for lymph node disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Article first published online: 23 MAY 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Cancer Society
Volume 104, Issue 1, pages 94–100, 1 July 2005
How to Cite
Wiegand, S., Dünne, A. A., Müller, H. H., Mandic, R., Barth, P., Davis, R. K. and Werner, J. A. (2005), Metaanalysis of the significance of matrix metalloproteinases for lymph node disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer, 104: 94–100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21131
- Issue published online: 17 JUN 2005
- Article first published online: 23 MAY 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 MAR 2005
- Manuscript Revised: 21 FEB 2005
- Manuscript Received: 2 AUG 2004
- matrix metalloproteinases;
- lymph node metastases;
- squamous cell carcinoma
The objective of the current metaanalysis was to evaluate the expression patterns of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), to evaluate reported series, and to determine whether there is an expressed value to quantitate the risk of metastasis.
A review of the published literature was conducted according to defined selection criteria. Fixed and random effects models were applied for estimation of the summarized odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals, including a test for homogeneity of the odds ratios of the studies. Finally, forest plots were created to allow for visual comparison of the results and an estimation of heterogeneity.
The heterogeneity of data collection and statistical methods did not allow final judgments on the significance of immunohistochemical MMP expression analysis in patients with HNSCC or the impact of MMPs in predicting metastatic behavior. Fourteen studies with 710 patients for 5 different MMPs (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, and MMP-14) were included in the current metaanalysis. The results indicated that MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-14 possibly played a role in the metastatic behavior of HNSCC tumors.
The authors recommended the standardization of staining procedures and evaluation protocols as a necessary step to allow for valid comparisons of the multitude of results published by different study groups. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.