• 1
    Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 1999; 90: 6769.
  • 2
    Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman A, et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep Processor. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994; 101: 121122.
  • 3
    Bishop JW, Marshall CJ, Bentz JS. New technologies in gynecologic cytology. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45: 701719.
  • 4
    Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears: including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol. 1998; 42: 189197.
  • 5
    Bentz JS, Rowe LR, Gopez EV, Marshall CJ. The unsatisfactory ThinPrep Pap test: missed opportunity for disease detection? Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 117: 457463.
  • 6
    Anderson, DM. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 28th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1994.
  • 7
    Tripath Imaging, Inc. AutoCyte PREP System™ operator's manual for in vitro diagnostic use. Burlington, NC: TriPath Imaging, Inc., 1999.
  • 8
    Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE. Cell block preparation by inverted filter sedimentation is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in ThinPrep specimens. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2000; 90: 265272.
  • 9
    Long LH, Goh EST, Phang LC, Poh WT, Tay SK. Technical aspect of ThinPrep. Singapore Med J. 2000; 41: 575578.
  • 10
    Belinson JL, Pan QJ, Wu LY, et al. Primary screening with liquid-based cytology in an unscreened population in rural China, with an emphasis on reprocessing unsatisfactory samples. Acta Cytol. 2002; 46: 470474.
  • 11
    Islam S, West AM, Saboorian MH, Ashfaq R. Reprocessing unsatisfactory ThinPrep Papanicolaou test specimens increases sample adequacy and detection of significant cervicovaginal lesions. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol). 2004; 102: 6773.
  • 12
    Hecht SA, Swinehart W, Linder J. Comparison of methods for reprocessing bloody gynecological specimens in PreservCyt® solution [abstract]. Acta Cytol. 2004; 48: 681.
  • 13
    Bolick DR, Kerr J, Staley BE, Lin KK. Effect of cellularity in the detection rates of high grade and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Acta Cytol. 2002; 46: 922923.