Original Article

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma†

  1. Anees B. Chagpar M.D., M.Sc.1,‡,*,
  2. Jamie L. Studts Ph.D.2,
  3. Charles R. Scoggins M.D.1,
  4. Robert C.G. Martin 2nd M.D.1,
  5. David J. Carlson M.D.3,
  6. Alison L. Laidley M.D.4,
  7. Souzan E. El-Eid M.D.5,
  8. Terre Q. McGlothin M.D.4,
  9. Robert D. Noyes M.D.6,
  10. Kelly M. McMasters M.D., Ph.D.1,
  11. University of Louisville Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Study§

Article first published online: 8 FEB 2006

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21728

Issue

Cancer

Cancer

Volume 106, Issue 7, pages 1462–1466, 1 April 2006

Additional Information

How to Cite

Chagpar, A. B., Studts, J. L., Scoggins, C. R., Martin, R. C.G., Carlson, D. J., Laidley, A. L., El-Eid, S. E., McGlothin, T. Q., Noyes, R. D., McMasters, K. M. and University of Louisville Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Study (2006), Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma. Cancer, 106: 1462–1466. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21728

Author Information

  1. 1

    Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky

  2. 2

    Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Louisville, Department of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky

  3. 3

    St. Mary's Medical Center and Deaconess Hospital, Evansville, Indiana

  4. 4

    Breast Surgeons of North Texas, Dallas, Texas

  5. 5

    Hudson Valley Surgical, Kingston, New York

  6. 6

    Latter Day Saints Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah

  1. ‡

    Fax: (502) 629-3183

  2. §

    A complete list of investigators in the University of Louisville Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Study is published in Am J Surg. 2002;184:496–8.

*Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 East Broadway, Suite #312, Louisville, KY

  1. †

    Presented at the American Society of Breast Diseases Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 14–16, 2005.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 16 MAR 2006
  2. Article first published online: 8 FEB 2006
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 5 OCT 2005
  4. Manuscript Revised: 8 SEP 2005
  5. Manuscript Received: 9 AUG 2005

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (74K)

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1233–1241.
  • 2
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1227–11232.
  • 3
    NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 265: 391–395.
  • 4
    The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I and II breast cancer. Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists. Can Med Assoc J. 1998; 158(Suppl 3): S15–S21.
  • 5
    Lazovich DA, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991; 266: 3433–3438.
  • 6
    Newcomb PA, Carbone PP. Cancer treatment and age: patient perspectives. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85: 1580–1584.
  • 7
    Nold RJ, Beamer RL, Helmer SD, McBoyle MF. Factors influencing a woman's choice to undergo breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2000; 180: 413–418.
  • 8
    Ward S, Heidrich S, Wolberg W. Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 1989; 12: 344–351.
  • 9
    Ballard-Barbash R, Potosky AL, Harlan LC, Nayfield SG, Kessler LG. Factors associated with surgical and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer in older women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 716–726.
  • 10
    Hussien M, Lioe TF, Finnegan J, Spence RAJ. Surgical treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast. 2003; 12: 23–35.
  • 11
    Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA. 1997; 277: 1485–1492.
  • 12
    Hillner BE, Penberthy L, Desch CE, McDonald MK, Smith TJ, Retchin SM. Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996; 40: 75–86.
  • 13
    Mandelblatt JS, Hadley J, Kerner JF, et al. Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women — patient preference and clinical and physician influences. Cancer. 2000; 89: 561–573.
    Direct Link:
  • 14
    Veronesi U, Luini A, Del Vecchio M, et al. Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328: 1587–1591.
  • 15
    Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Berry D, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women 70 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 971–977.
  • 16
    Fyles AW, McCready DR, Manchul LA, et al. Tamoxifen with or without breast irradiation in women 50 years of age or older with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 963–970.
  • 17
    Chagpar AB, Martin RC, Hagendoorn LJ, Chao C, McMasters KM. Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique. Am J Surg. 2004; 188: 399–402.
  • 18
    Mai KT, Yazdi HM, Isotalo PA. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000; 60: 29–33.
  • 19
    Molland JG, Donnellan M, Janu NC, Carmalt HL, Kennedy CW, Gillett DJ. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma—a comparison of diagnosis, management and outcome with infiltrating duct carcinoma. Breast. 2004; 13: 389–396.
  • 20
    Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1102–1107.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (74K)