Fax: (518) 262-3394
Role of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with low-grade lymphomas
Article first published online: 23 MAY 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Cancer Society
Volume 107, Issue 1, pages 175–183, 1 July 2006
How to Cite
Karam, M., Novak, L., Cyriac, J., Ali, A., Nazeer, T. and Nugent, F. (2006), Role of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with low-grade lymphomas. Cancer, 107: 175–183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21967
- Issue published online: 16 JUN 2006
- Article first published online: 23 MAY 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 FEB 2006
- Manuscript Revised: 14 DEC 2005
- Manuscript Received: 6 DEC 2005
- fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET);
- non-Hodgkin lymphoma;
- large cell transformation
Fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scanning has excellent sensitivity and specificity for staging non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but to the authors' knowledge few studies to date have evaluated FDG-PET in low-grade lymphomas only.
A retrospective study was performed on patients with biopsy-proven nontransformed and transformed follicular lymphoma (FL), B-cell small-cell lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL/CLL), or marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who underwent PET and computed tomography (CT) scans within 3 weeks. Standard uptake values (SUV) of all abnormal foci were measured.
In FL, PET demonstrated 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity for staging. PET was more specific than CT for detecting recurrence or assessing therapeutic responses (91% vs. 50%). FDG avidity among patients with WHO Grades 1, 2, and 3 disease was not significantly different (analysis of variance [ANOVA]). For MZL staging, PET had moderate sensitivity (71%) and outperformed CT alone in the depiction of extranodal sites (85% vs. 57% sensitivity). In SLL/CLL, PET sensitivity was 53% and underestimated disease extent in 5 of 19 patients (26%) compared with CT. PET did not affect initial management but confirmed suspected recurrences in 75% of patients. Nontransformed FL had a higher SUV (ANOVA, P<.05) compared with MZL and SLL/CLL. SUV was higher in transformed than in nontransformed tumors (P<.001, Student t test).
PET usefulness in staging low-grade lymphomas varies depending on histology. PET sensitivity is excellent in FL and moderate in MZL. PET is more specific than CT for follow-up in all types. PET has limited usefulness for SLL/CLL staging. However, a suggestive pattern of hazy and mild uptake was often noted in positive scans. In all low-grade lymphomas, the emergence of foci of intense uptake should raise suspicion of conversion to high-grade disease. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.