• 1
    American Cancer Society, California Division and Public Health Institute, California Cancer Registry. California Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society, California Division, Oakland, CA, 2003.
  • 2
    Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, Hankey B, Miller B, Clegg L, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003.
  • 3
    Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J, Little J. Rural and urban differences in stage at diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancers. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84: 910914.
  • 4
    Ionescu MV, Carey F, Tait IS, Steele RJ. Socioeconomic status and stage at presentation of colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1998; 352: 1439.
  • 5
    Liff JM, Chow WH, Greenberg RS. Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancerscreening. Cancer. 1991; 67: 14541459.
  • 6
    Schwartz KL, Crossley-May H, Vigneau FD, Brown K, Banerjee M. Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14: 761766.
  • 7
    Schouten LJ, Meijer H, Huveneers JA, Kiemeney LA. Urban-rural differences in cancer incidence in The Netherlands 1989–1991. Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 729736.
  • 8
    Krieger N, Quesenberry CJr, Peng T, Horn-Ross P, Stewart S, Brown S, et al. Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–1992 (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1999; 10: 525537.
  • 9
    Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997; 18: 341378.
  • 10
    Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kao R, Wallace R, Kerner J. The late stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: Demographic and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 17941797.
  • 11
    Vernon SW, Laville EA, Jackson GL. Participation in breast screening programs: A review. Soc Sci Med. 1990; 30: 11071118.
  • 12
    Baquet CR, Commiskey P. Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women. Cancer. 2000; 88( 5 Suppl): 12561264.
  • 13
    Breen N, Figueroa JB. Stage of breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in disadvantaged neighborhoods: A prevention policy perspective. Am J Prev Med. 1996; 12: 319326.
  • 14
    Figueroa JB, Breen N. Significance of underclass residence on the stage of breast or cervical cancer diagnosis. Am Econ Rev. 1995; 85: 112116.
  • 15
    Bennett CL, Ferreira MR, Davis TC, Kaplan J, Weinberger M, Kuzel T, et al. Relation between literacy, race, and stage of presentation among low-income patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16: 31013104.
  • 16
    Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L. Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: A comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1998; 9: 369380.
  • 17
    Casey MM, Thiede Call K, Klingner JM. Are rural residents less likely to obtain recommended preventive healthcare services? Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21: 182188.
  • 18
    Elnicki DM, Morris DK, Shockcor WT. Patient-perceived barriers to preventive health care among indigent, rural Appalachian patients. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155: 421424.
  • 19
    Carr WP, Maldonado G, Leonard PR, Halberg JU, Church TR, Mandel JH, et al. Mammogram utilization among farm women. J Rural Health. 1996; 12( 4 Suppl): 278290.
  • 20
    Strickland WJ, Hanson CM. Coping with the cost of prescription drugs. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1996; 7: 5062.
  • 21
    Meden T, St John-Larkin C, Hermes D, Sommerschield S. MSJAMA. Relationship between travel distance and utilization of breast cancer treatment in rural northern Michigan. JAMA. 2002; 287: 111.
  • 22
    Cancer Reporting in California: Standards for Automated Reporting. California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume II. California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA, December 1997.
  • 23
    Cancer Reporting in California: Data Standards for Regional Registries and California Cancer Registry. California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume III. California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA, December 1997.
  • 24
    Cancer Reporting in California: Reporting Procedures for Physicians. California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume IV. California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA, January 1998.
  • 25
    Cancer Reporting in California: Abstracting and Coding Procedures for Hospitals. California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I. California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA, June 1997.
  • 26
    Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
  • 27
    YoungJLJr, RoffersSD, RiesLAG, FritzAG, HurlbutAA, eds. SEER Summary Staging Manual - 2000: Codes and Coding Instructions. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2001. NIH Pub. No. 01-4969.
  • 28
    Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001; 12: 703711.
  • 29
    Rural Health Research Center. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (RUCAs), 2003. Available at
  • 30
    Palmer RC, Schneider EC. Social disparities across the continuum of colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Causes Control. 2005; 16: 5561.
  • 31
    Conlisk E. Colorectal cancer in North Carolina. Risk factors, screening behaviors, incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality. NC Med J. 2001; 62: 298303.
  • 32
    Thomas A, Carlin BP. Late detection of breast and colorectal cancer in Minnesota counties: An application of spatial smoothing and clustering. Stat Med. 2003; 22: 113127.
  • 33
    Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F. Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in ademographically defined region of the southern U.S. Cancer. 2002; 95: 22112222.
  • 34
    Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer. 2002; 94: 28012812.
  • 35
    Bryant H, Mah Z. Breast cancer screening attitudes and behaviors of rural and urban women. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 405418.
  • 36
    Larson SL, Fleishman JA. Rural-urban differences in usual source of care and ambulatory service use: Analyses of national data using Urban Influence Codes. Med Care. 2003; 41( 7 Suppl): III65III74.
  • 37
    Harris R, Leininger L. Preventive care in rural primary care practice. Cancer. 1993; 72( 3 Suppl): 11131118.
  • 38
    Rushton G, Peleg I, Banerjee A, Smith G, West M. Analyzing geographic patterns of disease incidence: Rates of late stage colorectal cancer in Iowa. J Med Syst. 2004; 28: 223236.
  • 39
    Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Gonzalez EC, Ferrante JM, Van Durme DJ, Ayanian JZ, et al. The effects of physician supply on the early detection of colorectal cancer. J Fam Pract. 1999; 48: 850858.
  • 40
    Rosenman KD, Gardiner J, Swanson GM, Mullan P, Zhu Z. U.S. farm women's participation in breast cancer screening practices. Cancer. 1995; 75: 4753.
  • 41
    Rauscher GH, Hawley ST, Earp JA. Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women. Prev Med. 2005; 40: 822830.
  • 42
    Zhang P, Tao G, Irwin KL. Utilization of preventive medical services in the United States: A comparison between rural and urban populations. J Rural Health. 2000; 16: 349356.
  • 43
    Krieger N. Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: Validation and application of a census-based methodology. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 703710.
  • 44
    California State Rural Health Association. An appropriate definition of rural for California, June 2002. Available at