SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract

The original article to which this Erratum refers was published in Cancer (2004) 101(4):657–60

In the article cited above, a discrepancy between the data in Figure 3 and Table 2 has been discovered.

The proportions of Stage data for rectal cancer in Figure 3 are incorrect; the correct data on Stage incidence in rectal cancer is given in Table 2. As a result of this change, the overall radiotherapy utilization rate for rectal cancer is 65%, not 61%.

Results and conclusions of this article remain unchanged.

The authors regret this error.