SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Jemal A,Murray T,Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 1030.
  • 2
    Ueland FR,DePriest P,DeSimone C, et al. The accuracy of examination under anesthesia and transvaginal sonography in evaluating ovarian size. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99: 400403.
  • 3
    Young RC,Walton LA,Ellenberg SS. Adjuvant therapy in stage I and II epithelial ovarian cancer: results of two prospective randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322: 10211027.
  • 4
    Ries LA,Kosary CL,Hankey BF, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1995. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1998.
  • 5
    Campbell S,Bhan V,Royston P, et al. Transabdominal ultrasound screening for early ovarian cancer. Br Med J. 1989; 299: 1363:1367.
  • 6
    van Nagell JR,Higgins RV,Donaldson ES, et al. Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for ovarian cancer: a report of the first 1000 cases screened. Cancer. 1990; 65: 573577.
  • 7
    Jacobs IJ,Bridges J,Reynolds C, et al. Multimodal approach to screening for ovarian cancer. Lancet. 1988; 2: 268271.
  • 8
    Bourne TH,Campbell S,Reynolds KM, et al. Screening for early familial ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography and colour blood flow imaging. Br Med J. 1993; 306: 10251029.
  • 9
    DePriest PD,Gallion HH,Pavilk EJ,Kryscio RK,van Nagell JR. Transvaginal sonography as a screening method for the detection of early ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 65: 408414.
  • 10
    Jacobs I,Skates SJ,MacDonald N,Menon U,Rosenthal A,Prys Davies A. Outcome of a pilot randomised controlled trial of ovarian cancer screening. Lancet. 1999; 253: 12071210.
  • 11
    Sato S,Yokoyama Y,Sakamoto T, et al. Usefulness of mass screening for ovarian carcinoma using transvaginal ultrasonography. Cancer. 2000; 89: 582588.
  • 12
    van Nagell JR,DePriest P,Reedy M, et al. The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 77: 350356.
  • 13
    Buys SS,Partridge E,Greene MH, et al. Ovarian cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 16301639.
  • 14
    Pavlik EJ,DePriest PD,Gallion HH, et al. Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 77: 410412.
  • 15
    Ueland F,DePriest P,Pavlik E,Kryscio R,van Nagell JR. Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 91: 4650.
  • 16
    Pavlik EJ,van Nagell JR,DePriest PD, et al. Participation in transvaginal ovarian cancer screening: compliance, correlation factors, and costs. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 57: 395400.
  • 17
    Pavlik EJ,Johnson TL,DePriest PD,Andrykowski MA,Kryscio RJ,van Nagell JR. Continuing participation supports ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 15: 354364.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    Higgins RV,van Nagell JR,Woods CH,Thompson EA,Kryscio RJ. Interobserver variation in ovarian measurements using transvaginal sonography. Gynecol Oncol. 1990; 39: 6971.
  • 19
    Prorok PC. Evaluation of screening program for the early detection of cancer. Natl Cancer Inst Stat Textbk Monogr. 1984; 51: 267328.
  • 20
    Hulka BS. Cancer screening: degrees of proof and practical application. Cancer. 1989; 62: 17761789.
  • 21
    Sassone M,Timor-Tritsch I,Artner A,Westhoff C,Warren WB. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 7076.
  • 22
    DePriest PD,Shenson D,Fried A, et al. A morphology index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1993; 51: 711.
  • 23
    Bailey CL,Ueland FR,Land GL, et al. Malignant potential of small cystic ovarian tumors in postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol. 1998; 69: 37.
  • 24
    Modesitt SC,Pavlik EJ,Ueland FR, et al. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 cm in diameter. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 594599.
  • 25
    Malkasian G,Knapp R,Lavin P, et al. Preoperative evaluation of serum Ca-125 levels in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with pelvic masses: discrimination of benign from malignant disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159: 341346.
  • 26
    Maggino T,Gadduci A,Daddario V, et al. Prospective multicenter study on Ca-125 in postmenopausal pelvic masses. Gynecol Oncol. 1994; 54: 117123.
  • 27
    Baron A,Boardman C,Lafky J, et al. Soluble epidermal growth factor receptor and cancer antigen 125 as screening and diagnostic tests for epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 113.
  • 28
    Jacobs IJ,Skates S,Davies AP, et al. Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum Ca-125 concentration: a prospective cohort study. Br Med J. 1996; 313: 13551358.
  • 29
    Humphrey LL,Helfand M,Benjamin KS, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 347360.
  • 30
    Hartmann KE,Hall SA,Nanda K, et al. Screening for Cervical Cancer. Systematic Evidence Review No. 25. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2002.
  • 31
    Maribs Study Group. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet. 2005; 365: 17691778.
  • 32
    Skates S,Manon U,MacDonald N, et al. Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial Ca-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 206210.
  • 33
    Urban N,Drescher C,Etzioni R,Colby C. Use of a stochastic simulation model to identify an efficient protocol for ovarian cancer screening. Control Clin Trials. 1997; 18: 251270.
  • 34
    Petricoin EF,Ardekani AM,Hitt BA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2002; 359: 572577.
  • 35
    Ransohoff D. Lessons from controversy: ovarian cancer screening and serum proteomics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 315319.
  • 36
    Armstrong DK,Bundy B,Wenzel L, et al. Phase III randomized trial of intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel versus an intensive regimen of intravenous paclitaxel, and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 3443.