Dr. Carroll has acted as a study trial investigator for both the National Cancer Institute and the Department of Defense and received no financial compensation. He has also acted as a member of the Speakers' Bureau for and received honorarium from InfoMedical Communications, and has acted as an investigator for TAP Pharmaceutical Products, for which he received no financial compensation.
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer†
Likelihood, patterns of care, and outcomes
Article first published online: 29 NOV 2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23161
Copyright © 2007 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Agarwal, P. K., Sadetsky, N., Konety, B. R., Resnick, M. I. and Carroll, P. R. (2008), Treatment failure after primary and salvage therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer, 112: 307–314. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23161
- †
See related editorial on pages 225–7, this issue.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 29 NOV 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 JUL 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 28 JUN 2007
- Manuscript Received: 26 MAR 2007
REFERENCES
- 1
- 2,,,,. Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003. Urology. 2003; 62: 86–91.
- 3,,, et al. Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multiinstitutional pooled analysis. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1598–1604.
- 4,,,. Patterns of failure after primary local therapy for prostate cancer and rationale for secondary therapy. Urology. 2002; 60( suppl 3A): 57–62.
- 5,,,,. Patterns of secondary cancer treatment for biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE. J Urol. 2004; 171: 215–219.
- 6,,, et al. The CaPSURE database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. Urology. 1996; 48: 773–777.
- 7,,, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998; 280: 969–974.
- 8,,,. Biochemical failure does not predict overall survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: 10-year results. Urology. 1999; 54: 884–890.
- 9,,,,,. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1642–1645.
- 10,,,,. The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003; 170: 1872–1876.
- 11,,,,. Recurrence-free survival rates after external beam radiotherapy for patients with clinical T1-T3 prostate carcinoma in the prostate-specific antigen era: what should we expect? Cancer. 2004; 6: 1283–1292.Direct Link:
- 12,,. Prognostic factors for clinically localized prostate carcinoma: analysis of 938 patients irradiated in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 1997; 79: 1370–1380.
- 13,,, et al. Biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen suppression therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2000; 284: 1280–1283.
- 14,,, et al. Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337: 295–300.
- 15,,,,. Salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005; 96: 1009–1013.Direct Link:
- 16,,, et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2004; 291: 1325–1332.
- 17,,, et al. Salvage radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes and long-term oncological control of radiorecurrent prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006; 176: 2025–2031.
- 18,,, et al. Salvage cryotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: variables affecting patient outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 2664–2671.
- 19,,, et al. Definitions of biochemical failure that best predict clinical failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation alone: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. J Urol. 2005; 173: 797–802.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)