1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470 "Cancer")
Fax: (713) 563-6940
1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Prospective analysis of carotid artery flow in breast cancer patients treated with supraclavicular irradiation 8 or more years previously†
No increase in ipsilateral carotid stenosis after radiation noted
Article first published online: 13 NOV 2007
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23172
Copyright © 2007 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Woodward, W. A., Durand, J. B., Tucker, S. L., Strom, E. A., Perkins, G. H., Oh, J., Arriaga, L., Domain, D. and Buchholz, T. A. (2008), Prospective analysis of carotid artery flow in breast cancer patients treated with supraclavicular irradiation 8 or more years previously. Cancer, 112: 268–273. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23172
- †
Presented at the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Annual Meeting, October 16–20, 2005, Denver, Colorado.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 13 NOV 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 AUG 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 1 AUG 2007
- Manuscript Received: 13 JUN 2007
Funded by
- National Cancer Institute Grants. Grant Numbers: CA16672, T32CA77050
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- breast radiation;
- supraclavicular;
- carotid artery;
- stenosis;
- late effects
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
To the authors' knowledge, the effects of supraclavicular fossa radiation on the carotid artery are not well described. In the current study, the authors performed a prospective study to examine the long-term risk of carotid artery stenosis after supraclavicular irradiation for breast cancer.
METHODS.
A total of 46 breast cancer patients who were treated with adjuvant radiation to the supraclavicular fossa with >8 years of follow-up underwent bilateral Doppler imaging of the carotid artery. Two independent cardiologists interpreted each ultrasound study with no knowledge of which side was treated.
RESULTS.
The median follow-up from the date of diagnosis was 14.6 years and the mean patient age at the time of ultrasound was 55 years. The median prescribed dose to the supraclavicular fossa was 50 grays. Four patients were found to have clinically relevant, asymptomatic carotid stenosis, for which a cardiology referral was necessary. Only 1 of these 4 patients had stenosis involving the irradiated carotid artery only; 1 patient had bilateral stenosis and 2 patients had only contralateral stenosis. There was no difference noted with regard to isolated ipsilateral versus contralateral medial intimal thickening of the carotid artery (5 patients vs 6 patients, respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences noted with regard to ipsilateral versus contralateral peak systolic flow in the internal (83.5 vs 85.6 cm/seconds; P = .522 by the Student t test and P = .871 by the signed rank test) or common (74.4 vs 77.0 cm/seconds; P = .462 by the Student t test and P = .246 by the signed rank test) carotid artery.
CONCLUSIONS.
In this prospective study of breast cancer patients with long follow-up, there was no evidence of late, clinically relevant stenosis, increased intimal thickening, or increased peak systolic carotid artery flow secondary to supraclavicular irradiation. Cancer 2008. © 2007 American Cancer Society.