• 1
    Swanson RS,Compton CC,Stewart AK,Bland KI. The prognosis of T3N0 colon cancer is dependent on the number of lymph nodes examined. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 6571.
  • 2
    Chen SL,Bilchik AJ. More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg. 2006; 244: 602610.
  • 3
    Le Voyer TE,Sigurdson ER,Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 29122919.
  • 4
    Herr HW,Bochner BH,Dalbagni G,Donat SM,Reuter VE,Bajorin DF. Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2002; 167: 12951298.
  • 5
    Herr HW,Faulkner JR,Grossman HB, et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 27812789.
  • 6
    Konety BR,Joslyn SA,O'Donnell MA. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base. J Urol. 2003; 169: 946950.
  • 7
    Schwarz RE,Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13: 11891200.
  • 8
    Schwarz RE,Smith DD. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 317328.
  • 9
    Polignano F,Henderson N,Alishahi SM,Zito A. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer and adequate lymphadenectomy: association between survival and number of lymph nodes. Surg Endosc. 1920; 996997.
  • 10
    Coburn NG,Swallow CJ,Kiss A,Law C. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer. 2006; 107: 21432151.
  • 11
    Johnson PM,Porter GA,Ricciardi R,Baxter NN. Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 35703575.
  • 12
    Compton CC,Fielding LP,Burgart LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999 [review]. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124: 979994.
  • 13
    Herr H,Lee C,Chang S,Lerner S, Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer: a collaborative group report. J Urol. 2004; 171: 18231828; discussion 1827–1828.
  • 14
    Stein JP,Skinner DG. The role of lymphadenectomy in high-grade invasive bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2005; 32: 187197.
  • 15
    Warren JL,Klabunde CN,Schrag D,Bach PB,Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 suppl ): IV-318.
  • 16
    Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Available at URL: Accessed November 11, 2006.
  • 17
    Herr HW,Smith JA,Montie JE. Standardization of radical cystectomy: time to count and be counted. BJU Int. 2004; 94: 481482.
  • 18
    Bach PB,Guadagnoli E,Schrag D,Schussler N,Warren JL. Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 suppl ): IV-1925.
  • 19
    Potosky AL,Warren JL,Riedel ER,Klabunde CN,Earle CC,Begg CB. Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER-Medicare data. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 suppl ): IV-6268.
  • 20
    Elixhauser A,Steiner C,Harris DR,Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998; 36: 827.
  • 21
    Diez Roux AV,Merkin SS,Arnett D, et al. Neighborhood of residence and incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 99106.
  • 22
    Grossman HB,Natale RB,Tangen CM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 859866.
  • 23
    Warren JL,Harlan LC,Fahey A, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 suppl ): IV-5561.
  • 24
    Birkmeyer JD,Siewers AE,Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 11281137.
  • 25
    Panageas KS,Schrag D,Riedel E,Bach PB,Begg CB. The effect of clustering of outcomes on the association of procedure volume and surgical outcomes [see comment]. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139: 658665.
  • 26
    Lin DY. Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach. Stat Med. 1994; 13: 22332247.
  • 27
    Stukel TA,Fisher ES,Wennberg DE,Alter DA,Gottlieb DJ,Vermeulen MJ. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. JAMA. 2007; 297: 278285.
  • 28
    Stukel TA,Lucas FL,Wennberg DE. Long-term outcomes of regional variations in intensity of invasive vs medical management of Medicare Patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2005; 293: 13291337.
  • 29
    Rosenbaum PR,Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983; 70: 4155.
  • 30
    Greenland S. An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. Int J Epidemiol. 2000; 29: 722729.
  • 31
    Herr HW,Faulkner JR,Grossman HB,Crawford ED. Pathologic evaluation of radical cystectomy specimens: a cooperative group report. Cancer. 2004; 100: 24702475.
  • 32
    Bochner BH,Cho D,Herr HW,Donat M,Kattan MW,Dalbagni G. Prospectively packaged lymph node dissections with radical cystectomy: evaluation of node count variability and node mapping. J Urol. 2004; 172(4 pt 1): 12861290.
  • 33
    Hollenbeck BK,Dunn RL,Miller DC,Daignault S,Taub DA,Wei JT. Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 9196.
  • 34
    Carroll PR,Albertsen PC,Smith JAJr,Howards SS. Volume of major surgeries performed by recent and senior graduates from North American urology training programs. J Urol. 2006; 175: 1.