Supplement

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Examining the association between socioeconomic status and potential human papillomavirus-associated cancers†‡§

  1. Vicki B. Benard PhD1,¶,*,
  2. Christopher J. Johnson MPH2,
  3. Trevor D. Thompson BS1,
  4. Katherine B. Roland MPH1,
  5. Sue Min Lai PhD, MS, MBA3,
  6. Vilma Cokkinides PhD4,
  7. Florence Tangka PhD1,
  8. Nikki A. Hawkins PhD1,
  9. Herschel Lawson MD1,
  10. Hannah K. Weir PhD1

Article first published online: 3 NOV 2008

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23742

Issue

Cancer

Cancer

Supplement: Assessing the Burden of HPV-Associated Cancers in the United States

Volume 113, Issue Supplement 10, pages 2910–2918, 15 November 2008

Additional Information

How to Cite

Benard, V. B., Johnson, C. J., Thompson, T. D., Roland, K. B., Lai, S. M., Cokkinides, V., Tangka, F., Hawkins, N. A., Lawson, H. and Weir, H. K. (2008), Examining the association between socioeconomic status and potential human papillomavirus-associated cancers. Cancer, 113: 2910–2918. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23742

Author Information

  1. 1

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia

  2. 2

    Cancer Data Registry of Idaho, Boise, Idaho

  3. 3

    Kansas Cancer Registry, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

  4. 4

    Department of Epidemiology and Research Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia

  1. Fax: (770) 488-4639.

*Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Mailstop K-55, NCCDPHP, CDC, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341

  1. †

    The opinions or views expressed in this supplement are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the journal editors, the American Cancer Society, Wiley-Blackwell, or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  2. ‡

    The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  3. §

    This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 3 NOV 2008
  2. Article first published online: 3 NOV 2008
  3. Manuscript Revised: 30 MAY 2008
  4. Manuscript Accepted: 30 MAY 2008
  5. Manuscript Received: 14 APR 2008

Funded by

  • Cooperative Agreement. Grant Number: U50 DP424071-04
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (114K)

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Williams DR. Missed opportunities in monitoring socioeconomic status. Public Health Rep. 1997; 112: 492–494.
  • 2
    Williams DR. Understanding the Joint Effects of SES and Race/Ethnicity in Health Disparities Policy Analysis. 2007; Presented at the CDC/ATSDR Statistical Methods Conference, Decatur, GA, April 17, 2007.
  • 3
    Baquet CR,Horm JW,Gibbs T,Greenwald P. Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 838: 551–557.
  • 4
    Devesa SS,Diamond EL. Association of breast cancer and cervical cancer incidence with income and education among whites and blacks. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980; 65: 515–528.
  • 5
    Gordon NH,Crowe JP,Brumberg DJ,Berger NA. Socioeconomic factors and race in breast cancer recurrence and survival. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 135: 609–618.
  • 6
    Wagener DK,Schatzkin A. Temporal trends in the socioeconomic gradient for breast cancer mortality among US women. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 1003–1006.
  • 7
    LaVeist TA. Disentangling race and socioeconomic status: a key to understanding health inequalities. J Urban Health. 2005; 82( suppl 3): iii26–iii34.
  • 8
    Ansell D,Whitman S,Lipton R,Cooper R. Race, income, and survival from breast cancer at 2 public hospitals. Cancer. 1993; 72: 2974–2978.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Eggleston KS,Coker AL,Williams M,Tortolero-Luna G,Martin JB,Tortolero SR. Cervical cancer survival by socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, and place of residence in Texas, 1995-2001. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2006; 15: 941–951.
  • 10
    Liu L,Deapen D,Bernstein L. Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California United States. Cancer Causes Control. 1998; 9: 369–380.
  • 11
    Mack TM. Cancers in the Urban Environment: Patterns of Malignant Disease in Los Angeles County and Its Neighborhoods. London: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
  • 12
    Gorey KM,Vena JE. Cancer differentials among US blacks and whites: quantitative estimates of socioeconomic-related risks. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994; 86: 209–215.
  • 13
    McWhorter WP,Schatzkin AG,Horm JW,Brown CC. Contribution of socioeconomic status to black/white differences in cancer incidence. Cancer. 1989; 63: 982–987.
    Direct Link:
  • 14
    Singh GK,Miller BA,Hankey BF,Edwards BK. Area Socioeconomic Variations in U.S. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Stage, Treatment, and Survival, 1975-1999. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2003. NIH Publication 03-5417.
  • 15
    Coker AL,Du XL,Fang S,Eggleston KS. Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102: 278–284.
  • 16
    Coughlin SS,King J,Richards TB,Ekwueme DU. Cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by individual-level and area-based measures of socioeconomic status, 2000 to 2002. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 2154–2159.
  • 17
    Datta GD,Colditz GA,Kawachi I,Subramanian SV,Palmer JR,Rosenberg L. Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis. Cancer. 2006; 106: 664–669.
    Direct Link:
  • 18
    de Sanjose S,Bosch FX,Munoz N,Shah K. Social differences in sexual behaviour and cervical cancer. IARC Sci Publ. 1997: 309–317.
  • 19
    Fernandez-Esquer ME,Ross MW,Torres I. The importance of psychosocial factors in the prevention of HPV infection and cervical cancer. Int J STD AIDS. 2000; 11: 701–713.
  • 20
    Khan MJ,Partridge EE,Wang SS,Schiffman M. Socioeconomic status and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 among oncogenic human papillomavirus DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal cytology. Cancer. 2005; 104: 61–70.
    Direct Link:
  • 21
    Oliveira LH,Rosa ML,Pereira CR, et al. Human papillomavirus status and cervical abnormalities in women from public and private health care in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2006; 48: 279–285.
  • 22
    Parikh S,Brennan P,Boffetta P. Meta-analysis of social inequality and the risk of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2003; 105: 687–691.
    Direct Link:
  • 23
    Scarinci IC,Beech BM,Kovach KW,Bailey TL. An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age. J Immigr Health. 2003; 5: 119–128.
  • 24
    Schwartz KL,Crossley-May H,Vigneau FD,Brown K,Banerjee M. Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for 5 common malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2003; 14: 761–766.
  • 25
    Singh GK,Miller BA,Hankey BF,Edwards BK. Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000. Cancer. 2004; 101: 1051–1057.
    Direct Link:
  • 26
    Bezerra ALR,Lopes A,Santiago GH,Ribeiro KCB,Latorre MRDO,Villa LL. Human papillomavirus as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. Cancer. 2001; 91: 2315–2321.
    Direct Link:
  • 27
    Bjorge T,Engeland A,Luostarinen T, et al. Human papillomavirus infection as a risk factor for anal and perianal skin cancer in a prospective study. Br J Cancer. 2002; 87: 61–64.
  • 28
    Bonvincini F,Venturoli S,Ambretti S, et al. Presence and type of oncogenic human papillomavirus in classic and in differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and keratinizing vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. J Med Virol. 2005; 77: 102–106.
    Direct Link:
  • 29
    Boy S,Van Renseburg EJ,Engelbrecht S,Dreyer L,van Heerden M,van Heerden W. HPV detection in primary intra-oral squamous cell carcinomas—commensal, aetiological agent or contamination? J Oral Pathol Med. 2006; 35: 86–90.
    Direct Link:
  • 30
    Canadas MP,Bosch FX,Junquera ML, et al. Concordance of prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in anogenital and oral infections in a high-risk population. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42: 1330–1332.
  • 31
    Clark MA,Hartley A,Geh JI. Cancer of the anal canal. Lancet Oncol. 2004; 5: 149–157.
  • 32
    Clifford GM,Smith JS,Plummer M,Munoz N,Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88: 63–73.
  • 33
    Franceschi S,Castellsague X,Dal Maso L, et al. Prevalence and determinants of human papillomavirus genital infection in men. Br J Cancer. 2002; 86: 705–711.
  • 34
    Ikenberg H,Runge M,Goppinger A,Pfleiderer A. Human papillomavirus DNA in invasive carcinoma of the vagina. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 763(pt 1): 432–438.
  • 35
    Joura EA. Epidemiology and precursors of vulvar cancer. J Women's Imaging. 2002; 4: 126–129.
  • 36
    Watson M,Saraiya M,Ahmed F, et al. Using population-based cancer registry data to assess the burden of HPV-associated cancers in the US: Overview of methods. Cancer. 2008; 113( 10 suppl): 2841–2854.
    Direct Link:
  • 37
    Census 2000 Summary File 3 Technical Documentation, 2002. US Census Bureau 2007. Available at:http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2002/sumfile3.html Accessed July 8, 2008.
  • 38
    2003 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Washington, DC. US Dept of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2004. Available at:http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/RuralUrbanContinuumCodes/ Accessed October 10, 2007.
  • 39
    Fay MP,Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997; 16: 791–801.
    Direct Link:
  • 40
    Fay MP,Tiwari RC,Feuer EJ,Zou Z. Estimating average annual percent change for disease rates without assuming constant change. Biometrics. 2006; 62: 847–854.
    Direct Link:
  • 41
    Tobler WR. A computer movie simulating urban growth inthe Detroit region. Economic Geography. 1970; 46: 234–240.
  • 42
    Ruppert D,Wand MP,Carroll RJ. Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
  • 43
    Schabenberger O. Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Generalized Linear Mixed Models. SAS Users Group International SUGI. Paper 196-30; 2005. Available at:http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/196-30.pdf
  • 44
    Lindstrom MJ,Bates DM. Newton-Raphson and EM. Algorithms for linear mixed-effects models for repeated-measures data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988; 83: 1014–1022.
  • 45
    McDougall JA,Madeleine MM,Daling JR,Li CI. Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical cancer incidence rates in the United States, 1992-2003. Cancer Causes Control. 2007; 18: 1175–1186.
  • 46
    Parkin DM,Bray F. The burden of HPV-related cancers. In: BoschFX,CuzickJ,SchillerJT,GarnettGP,MeheusA,FrancoEL,WrightT, eds. Vaccine: HPV Vaccines and Screening in the Prevention of Cervical Cancer. Vol 24. Elsevier; 2006: S1–S264.
  • 47
    Coughlin SS,Thompson TD,Hall HI,Logan P,Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer. 2002; 94: 2801–2812.
    Direct Link:
  • 48
    Hall HI,Rogers JD,Weir HK,Miller DS,Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma mortality among women in the Appalachian region of the U.S., 1976-1996. Cancer. 2000; 89: 1593–1602.
    Direct Link:
  • 49
    Stearns SC,Slifkin RT,Edin HM. Access to care for rural Medicare beneficiaries. J Rural Health. 2000; 16: 31–42.
    Direct Link:
  • 50
    Krieger N,Quesenberry CJr,Peng T, et al. Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, black, Hispanic, and white residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988-1992 United States. Cancer Causes Control. 1999; 10: 525–537.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (114K)