Fax: (916) 779-0264.
Supplement
Cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Asian subgroups in California, 1990–2004†‡§¶
Article first published online: 3 NOV 2008
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23752
Published 2008 by the American Cancer Society
Issue
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)
Cancer
Supplement: Assessing the Burden of HPV-Associated Cancers in the United States
Volume 113, Issue Supplement 10, pages 2955–2963, 15 November 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Bates, J. H., Hofer, B. M. and Parikh-Patel, A. (2008), Cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Asian subgroups in California, 1990–2004. Cancer, 113: 2955–2963. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23752
- †
This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
- ‡
The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N01-PC-54404 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, under agreement 1U58DP00807-01, awarded to the Public Health Institute.
- §
We thank Sandy Kwong, MPH and Mark Allen, MS for their assistance with data analyses, and Allyn Fernandez-Ami, MPH, for her support and assistance in the preparation of this article.
- ¶
The findings and conclusions of this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the State of California's Department of Public Health, or the National Cancer Institute.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 3 NOV 2008
- Article first published online: 3 NOV 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 4 JUN 2008
- Manuscript Received: 14 APR 2008
Funded by
- Cooperative Agreement. Grant Number: U50 DP424071-04
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cervical cancer;
- Asian ethnicity;
- incidence rate;
- trends;
- survival;
- human papillomavirus
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
Aggregated cancer statistics for Asians mask important differences in cancer burden among Asian subgroups. The purpose of this study was to describe the relative patterns of cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and survival among Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, South Asian, and Vietnamese women in California, using data from the California Cancer Registry.
METHODS.
All cervical cancer cases diagnosed among the 6 subgroups and non-Hispanic whites (NHW) from 1990 to 2004 were identified and used to calculate incidence and mortality rates and trends. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate 5- and 10-year survival probabilities by subgroup, and Cox proportional hazards methodology was used to calculate survival differences adjusted for race and ethnicity, age, stage at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, and treatment factors.
RESULTS.
Vietnamese and Korean women experienced greater cervical cancer incidence and mortality than NHW women, whereas rates among Chinese, Japanese, and South Asians were comparable or lower. Five-year unadjusted survival probabilities were greatest for South Asians (86%) and Koreans (86%), followed by Vietnamese (82%), Chinese (79%), and Filipinos (79%), as compared with NHW (78%) and Japanese (72%). The adjusted risk of cervical cancer death was significantly lower for South Asians, Koreans, Vietnamese, and Filipinos than for NHW women, but not for Chinese and Japanese.
CONCLUSIONS.
Cervical cancer incidence rates vary substantially across the major Asian subgroups. Despite higher incidence and mortality rates compared with NHW women, Vietnamese, Koreans, and Filipinos have better survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to examine the factors behind these survival differences. Cancer 2008;113(10 suppl):2955–63. Published 2008 by the American Cancer Society.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)