SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • strategic health communications;
  • breast cancer;
  • limited-resource countries;
  • communication campaigns

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Strategic health communication is a critical component of healthcare that should be implemented across the continuum of care. Recognizing the importance of communication strategies and incorporating such strategies into healthcare policies, programs, and interventions is essential to the effective delivery of breast cancer care. The authors reviewed relevant literature and suggested practical evidence-based strategies for effective communication interventions across the continuum of care for breast cancer patients, including early detection, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, palliative care, and end-of-life care. Examples were provided from limited-resource nations to support health communication recommendations. Cancer 2008;113(8 suppl):2331–37. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide, with more than 1 million women diagnosed and more than 500,000 deaths from breast cancer each year.1, 2 Although breast cancer incidence is lower in developing countries when compared with the US, the mortality is often much higher.3, 4 To reduce the serious disparity in breast cancer mortality in limited-resource countries, efforts must be taken to promote early detection and the delivery of the best available treatments and support for breast cancer. Strategic health communication can perform an important role in achieving these goals. This article examines strategic health communication factors in developing and implementing effective evidence-based, economically feasible, and culturally appropriate interventions to improve breast cancer outcomes that can be applied in nations with limited healthcare resources.

Communication Across the Continuum of Care

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Health communication is an essential component in each phase of the continuum of cancer care.5 Strategic health communication campaigns for breast cancer prevention that use multiple channels of communication can be used to effectively disseminate relevant information regarding breast health risks to vulnerable populations and encourage adoption of health-promoting behaviors (such as good nutrition, regular exercise, weight management, moderate intake of alcoholic beverages, smoking cessation, and minimizing contact with known carcinogens) to reduce these risks.6–12 Communication campaigns should be designed and implemented using persuasive communication strategies based on local social, cultural, and economic factors, and should include an analysis of the health beliefs, values, and orientations of the target audience.5

Early Detection

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

In limited-resource countries, communication campaigns to promote early detection of breast cancer are needed to encourage participation in regular breast cancer screening activities.13, 14 Early detection of breast cancer has been shown to improve outcomes from breast cancer treatment.15, 16 Cultural, economic, and technological factors often minimize participation in screening procedures by those at high risk for breast cancer.17–20 Communication campaigns to promote early detection of breast cancer must be designed to address the unique constraints of a population that influence participation in cancer screening activities. Constraints may include cultural norms of modesty that may discourage women from seeking breast cancer screening, lack of familiarity with and distrust of the modern healthcare system, and/or socioeconomic factors that may make it difficult for women to travel to clinics where they can access breast cancer screening services.21, 22

Diagnosis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Accurate diagnoses of breast cancers depend on effective communication between healthcare providers (eg, primary care physician, pathologist, radiologist, oncologist, nursing staff), as well as between providers and patients. Strategic communication is needed to gather, analyze, and interpret relevant symptom and laboratory test data, as well as to sensitively report diagnostic results to patients.5, 23 Significant impediments in communication at any step in the process can lead to delays in breast cancer diagnoses, resulting in late-stage presentation of breast cancers, when these cancers are most difficult to treat.24, 25 Impediments can include poor or insensitive communication skills of providers. Efforts must be made to develop effective communication strategies for gathering and analyzing relevant diagnostic data, and delivering diagnostic results to consumers in the most meaningful and helpful ways.23

Treatment

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Communication is an important component of breast cancer treatment. Treatment of breast cancer is a complex process that depends on effective communication between providers and patients (and often with patients' family members and support networks) for successful outcomes. Active patient participation in treatment decision making has been shown to significantly enhance health outcomes, increase patients' sense of control over their care, and improve overall satisfaction with care.24–29 Effective communication can be challenging, especially when healthcare providers need to deliver difficult treatment options and results (bad news) to their patients.30, 31 These challenges are exacerbated in developing countries where there are often limited resources, personnel, and technologies available for cancer care.32 Developing strategic health communication policies, programs, and interventions across the continuum of care is essential to maximizing the effectiveness of cancer care treatment.23

Survivorship

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Sensitive and timely communication is essential for effective cancer survivorship.23, 33, 34 There are currently approximately 11 million cancer survivors in the US and many more worldwide, with the numbers of cancer survivors increasing.35, 36 Cancer survivors report poorer health, lower quality of life, lost productivity, and many health limitations; they are also at risk for reoccurrence of cancer, with 10% of all new cancers diagnosed in survivors.37, 38 Cancer survivors often have significant unmet health information needs, based upon the many uncertainties they face. They have many questions, including how to prevent reoccurrence (and fear of reoccurrence); how to manage health problems and side effects from cancer treatments; whether to seek additional treatments, or use supplements or alternative therapies; how to reintegrate into their personal and professional lives after cancer treatment; and how to cope with challenges to their mortality.39, 40 Communication regarding quality of life, relief of pain and suffering, and coping with end-of-life issues need to be addressed for cancer survivors, especially in limited-resource countries in which there may be few formal sources of health information, palliative care, and social support for cancer survivors.41, 42

Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

It is important to develop culturally sensitive health communication programs and policies, especially in limited-resource countries.43, 44 Culture frames the social norms, beliefs, values, and languages that healthcare consumers use to respond to and communicate about breast cancer.45 There are multiple cultural groups in any population or country, and each group influences the way members interpret and communicate about health and illness.46 Any single set of health communication practices is not likely to work equally well in different countries. For example, health communication programs that are appropriate and effective in the US may be ineffective and inappropriate if used in Brazil, Cambodia, or Indonesia. Interventions need to be guided by in-depth analyses of the unique culturally based communication features of each country or target population and should have a measurable evaluation component when possible.

An example is seen in the Prashanti Cancer Care Mission program developed in Pune, India.47 The target audience was segmented into key homogenous groups based on religion; literacy and education; financial status; castes; status as urban, semiurban, or rural; language of communication; and relevancy. With greater than 415 languages spoken, a multilingual approach was required. Other cultural differences were addressed, including education level and interests. For example, highly educated women scientists were presented a combination of facts and statistics related to breast cancer, molecular targeted therapies, trastuzumab (Herceptin), and specific biomarkers; whereas women who came from protected backgrounds and were high school educated were given a more basic educational program, using posters, power point presentation, and leaflets adapted to their languages, needs, and beliefs. Culture-specific visual images for posters were gathered from classical Indian art forms to present culturally acceptable images of women, breasts, and torsos using tree spirits and deities from sculptures. Using these art forms to present the breast as integral to a woman's feminine, maternal, sexual, biologic, physical, emotional, and spiritual reality provides a grounding in the cultural ethos of the community and hence mitigates aversion and uncomfortable reactions.

Communication and Social Support

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

The provision of social support has been shown to be an effective communication strategy for moderating many negative psychological reactions to breast cancer, and helps promote psychosocial adaptation, such as reducing cancer-related pain and suffering, encouraging participation in cancer prevention and control activities, and coping with end-of-life concerns.48–51 Social support can be provided to cancer patients by healthcare providers, family members, friends, and peers who experience similar healthcare challenges.52–54 The ability to provide meaningful social support depends on the communicators' abilities to engage in sensitive and empathetic interpersonal communication. Research suggests that peers who share similar experiences with breast cancer (often in online support groups) are particularly rich sources for social support.55, 56 In limited-resource countries it is particularly important to develop programs that facilitate access to relevant sources of social support to promote adaptation to the stresses of breast cancer. Strategic health communication programs that promote effective breast cancer survivorship should provide opportunities for participation in social support networks.

Communication Channels

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Patient-provider communication

Interpersonal interaction between patients and healthcare providers is a primary channel for health information regarding breast cancer.26, 49, 57 Both healthcare providers and consumers need to share relevant health information. Providers depend on gathering full and accurate information from their patients about symptoms, health behaviors, and psychosocial responses to cancer.5 Patients need the most accurate and up-to-date information concerning breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, survivorship, palliative care, and end-of-life issues. In general, patients consider their physicians to be preferred sources for such information.29, 43, 58 Effective patient-provider communication can encourage patient cooperation (compliance) with treatment recommendations.57, 59 Sensitive and culturally competent communication strategies are needed to ameliorate the significant differences in cultural backgrounds (such as age, education, socioeconomic status, sex, and national origin) that often exist between patients and providers.45 Similarly, competent interpersonal communication among interdependent healthcare providers (physicians, nurses, therapists, pharmacists, and other professionals) who are part of the breast cancer treatment team is essential for coordinating effective breast cancer care.60

Family/social network communication

The family is a primary cultural unit for health education across most countries despite the level of economic development, and helps establish culturally engrained beliefs about health and illness.61 Family members and friends are significant sources for health information that can influence cancer prevention, control, and care activities.45 Family members, especially in many limited-resource countries, often provide needed home care to spouses, parents, and children with cancer. Strategic health communication efforts in limited-resource countries must include educating key family members and friends about ways they can serve as advocates to help support the health information needs of those with breast cancer.

The social networks that healthcare consumers have within their local communities are very powerful influences on health beliefs and health behaviors.62 Local opinion leaders have high credibility and are often ideal sources for delivering and reinforcing breast health messages.45 For example, in Malaysia, local folk healers known as “bomos” are potentially important health information sources for many women, if bomos are educated regarding the latest relevant breast health information.46 However, health promoters have found that significant time and resources are often needed to identify and develop relationships with key community leaders within at-risk communities in limited-resource countries.61–63 To maintain changes in health behavior over time, it is important to develop broad community support.64 For example, although it is good to encourage women to engage in recommended mammography screening, it is even better to build local social policies and programs within the communities where these women live to support mammography services. However, it is not productive to encourage women to seek early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer when they have limited access to care, which is a reality in many developing countries.3 Community engagement in breast cancer awareness and prevention in low-income countries is needed and should be part of an overall strategic health communication strategy to enhance breast cancer prevention, early detection, and access to care.64, 65

Communication Campaign Interventions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Strategic communication campaigns help influence health behaviors at the group, community, and population levels.64 They have been used to decrease the prevalence of smoking, to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables, and to increase adherence with recommended cancer screening recommendations.66 For campaigns to be most effective they must be carefully targeted to meet the unique needs and communication orientations of the targeted audience in limited-resource countries.67–69 Data regarding target audiences should help identify relevant consumer characteristics and guide message design.63 Messages should appeal to the central beliefs, attitudes, and values of targeted audiences, and use familiar and culturally acceptable language, images, and examples. Messages should be disseminated by familiar, credible information sources, and build on well-accepted cultural beliefs and values. For example, a campaign strategy for promoting breast cancer screening for Islamic women in countries such as Pakistan, Lebanon, or Libya might emphasize woman-friendly Islamic tenets such as prevention and individual responsibility for health promotion by following good habits, because this is a cultural belief that strongly supports breast cancer screening, while minimizing potential cultural barriers such as sex, patriarchy, marital, and modesty issues that might inhibit screening for breast cancer.70, 71

Redundancy and reinforcement are effective communication strategies that use multiple, overlapping messages to enhance message exposure and impact.72 Multiple messages can help to capture audience attention, reinforce message content, and illustrate key health education concepts. Campaigns should use visual and dramatic imagery that is attractive to specific target audiences and can reinforce message content, considering the health literacy of the audience and problems with numeracy that make it difficult to understand complicated text, statistics, and numerical risk estimates.73

Developing media partnerships

The media can be a powerful communication outlet about breast health in both limited- and high-resource countries.18, 23 Breast health promoters need to persuade media producers (print, online, television, radio, film, etc) that breast health issues are of concern to their audiences and provide relevant stories and supporting materials concerning breast health. Entertainment education, such as the use of serial radio programs, novellas, and dramatic performances, has been shown in many limited-resource Latin American, African, and Asian countries to be a powerful medium for disseminating influential health information.74, 75 Television is a well-utilized source for cancer-related information in more developed nations, particularly by low-income, low-education, and low-literacy groups who often suffer from serious disparities in cancer outcomes.58

Health promoters need to pitch specific stories to media outlets that will be of interest to audiences in a way that is easy for media producers to use. For example, to promote news coverage about key cancer issues, the National Cancer Institute's Press Office has developed cancer education training programs for journalists, and has provided easily accessible updated information about breaking cancer news online (available at: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/ accessed on June 8, 2008) with news summaries, direct quotes from subject experts, and geographically relevant statistical information that could easily be used in news stories. Similarly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has established a cooperative agreement with the Hollywood Health and Society Program to encourage the development of dramatic programs for television, radio, and film concerning important health issues.76 Similar collaborative strategies for working with local media producers in limited-resource countries can be used to enhance media coverage of breast health issues.

Implementing public policies for cancer communication

To be effective, health communication interventions need to be carefully planned, based on research evidence, strategically designed, and carefully implemented and refined over time based on evaluation of outcomes, especially in limited-resource countries. National, regional, and international policies for breast health promotion are needed to guide effective health communication efforts. Healthcare providers and consumers need to develop culturally sensitive communication competencies for sharing relevant information and coordinating efforts. Healthcare delivery systems need communication strategies and resources to promote breast health. Breast health promoters should plan communication interventions that use key media and present accurate and persuasive information via the most influential communication channels. An evaluation component should be included to help refine future communication strategies. For example, it is important to formally assess through formative and summative evaluation research the costs and potential benefits of cancer prevention and control interventions to make sure that limited resources are effectively used.5, 23, 63, 64 This is a process that holds great promise to reduce the burden of breast cancer in limited-resource nations.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

Funding for the BHGI, 2007 Global Summit on International Breast Health-Implementation and Guidelines for International Breast Health and Cancer Control-Implementation publication came from partnering organizations who share a commitment to medically underserved women. We thank and gratefully acknowledge these organizations and agencies for grants and conference support: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Susan G. Komen for the Cure; American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); US National Cancer Institute, Office of International Affairs (OIA); American Cancer Society; Lance Armstrong Foundation; US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (*Grant 1 R13 HS017218-01); US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; American Society of Breast Disease; Oncology Nursing Society; US National Cancer Institute, Office of Women's Health (OWH); and US National Institutes of Health, Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH).

*Funding for the 2007 Global Summit on International Breast Health—Implementation was made possible (in part) by Grant No. 1 R13 HS017218-01 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade names, commercial practices, or organizations suggest endorsement by the US Government.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES

We thank and gratefully acknowledge the generous support of our corporate partners through unrestricted educational grants: Pfizer Inc.; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Ethicon Endo Surgery, Inc.; GE Healthcare; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG; and Novartis Oncology.

BHGI is a global health alliance of organizations and individuals. We are grateful to our collaborators throughout the world who share the BHGI mission and vision. Thank you for your important contributions to this endeavor for medically underserved women.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Communication Across the Continuum of Care
  4. Early Detection
  5. Diagnosis
  6. Treatment
  7. Survivorship
  8. Culturally Sensitive Health Communication Strategies
  9. Communication and Social Support
  10. Communication Channels
  11. Communication Campaign Interventions
  12. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
  13. Acknowledgements
  14. REFERENCES
  • 1
    Susan G.Komen for the Cure. The State of Breast Cancer 2007. Available at:http://cms.komen.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/komen_document/071126_komen_sobc_2007.pdf Accessed on June 8, 2008.
  • 2
    Bray F,McCarron P. Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer mortality. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004; 6: 229239.
  • 3
    Kanavos P. The rising burden of cancer in the developing world. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17 ( suppl 8): 1523.
  • 4
    Porter P. “Westernizing” women's risks? Breast cancer in lower-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 213216.
  • 5
    Kreps GL. The impact of communication on cancer risk, incidence, morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Health Commun. 2003; 15: 163171.
  • 6
    Smith-Warner SA,Spiegelman D,Yaun SS, et al. Intake of fruits and vegetables and risk of breast cancer: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA. 2001; 285: 769776.
  • 7
    McTiernan A,Kooperberg C,White E, et al. Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The Women's Health Initiative Cohort Study. JAMA. 2003; 290: 13311336.
  • 8
    McTiernan A. Associations between energy balance and body mass index and risk of breast carcinoma in women from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds in the U.S. Cancer. 2000; 88: 12481255.
  • 9
    Morimoto LM,White E,Chen Z, et al. Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002; 13: 741751.
  • 10
    Huang Z,Hankinson SE,Colditz GA, et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA. 1997; 278: 14071411.
  • 11
    Singletary KW,Gapstur SM. Alcohol and breast cancer: review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence and potential mechanisms. JAMA. 2001; 286: 21432151.
  • 12
    Hamajima N,Hirose K,Tajima K, et al. Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer—collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer. 2002; 87: 12341245.
  • 13
    International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Handbook on Cancer Prevention. Breast Cancer Screening. Vol 7. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002.
  • 14
    Institute of Medicine. Cancer Control Opportunities in Low and Middle Income Countries. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
  • 15
    Smith RA,Cokkinides V,Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 3144.
  • 16
    Humphrey LL,Helfand M,Chan BK,Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 347360.
  • 17
    Jibaja-Weiss ML. Differential effects of messages for breast and cervical cancer screening. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005; 16: 4252.
  • 18
    Jones K,Denham BE,Springston JK. Effects of mass and interpersonal communication on breast cancer screening: advancing agenda-setting theory in health contexts. J Appl Commun Res. 2006; 34: 94113.
  • 19
    Hiatt RA,Pasick RJ,Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 190203.
  • 20
    Ballard-Barbash R,Klabunde C,Paci E, et al. Breast cancer screening in 21 countries: delivery of services, notification of results and outcomes ascertainment. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999; 8: 417426.
  • 21
    Kagawa-Singer M. Addressing issues for early detection and screening in ethnic populations—an update. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000; 27: 6263.
  • 22
    Shyyan R,Masood S,Badwe RA, et al. Breast cancer in limited-resource countries: diagnosis and pathology. Breast J. 2006; 12 ( suppl): S27S37.
  • 23
    Kreps, GL,Bonaguro E. Communication and cancer prevention, control, and care. In: WrightKB,MooreS, eds. Applied Health Communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 2008: 257269.
  • 24
    Vargas HI,Anderson BO,Chopra R, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer in countries with limited resources. Breast J. 2003; 9 ( suppl. 2): S60S66.
  • 25
    Abdel-Fattah MM,Anwar AM,Mari E, et al. Patient- and system-related diagnostic delay in breast cancer. Eur J Public Health. 1999; 9: 1519.
  • 26
    Hawighorst-Knapstein S,Brueckner DO,Schoenefuss G,Knapstein PG,Koelbl H. Breast cancer care: patient information and communication as a preventive educational process. Breast Care. 2006; 1: 375378.
  • 27
    Liang W,Burnett CB,Rowland JH, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 10081016.
  • 28
    Gittell JH,Fairfield KM,Bierbaum B, et al. Impact of relational coordination on quality of care, postoperative pain and functioning, and length of stay: a 9 hospital study of surgical patients. Med Care. 2000; 38: 807819.
  • 29
    Greenfield S,Kaplan S,Ware JJr. Expanding patient involvement in care: effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102: 520528.
  • 30
    Back AL,Arnold RN,Baile WF,Tulsky JA,Fryer-Edwards K. Approaching difficult communication tasks in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 164177.
  • 31
    Baile WF,Beale EA. Giving bad news to cancer patients: matching process and content. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 25752577.
  • 32
    Carlson RW,Anderson BO,Chopra R, et al. Treatment of breast cancer in countries with limited resources. Breast J. 2003; 9 ( suppl 2): S67S74.
  • 33
    Clayton MF. Communication with breast cancer survivors. Commun Nurs Res. 2006; 39: 8391.
  • 34
    Rowland JH,Hewitt M,Ganz PA. Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in delivering quality cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 51015104.
  • 35
    RiesLAG,YoungJL,KeelGE,EisnerMP,LinYD,HornerM-J, eds. SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults. US SEER Program, 1988–2001, Patient and Tumor Characteristics. NIH Pub. No. 07–6215. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, SEER Program; 2007.
  • 36
    Gilligan TD,Carrington MA,Sellers TP,Casal L,Schnipper LE,Li FP. Cancer survivorship issues for minority and underserved populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003; 12: 284S286S.
  • 37
    Mayer DK,Terrin NC,Menon U, et al. Health behaviors in cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007; 34: 643652.
  • 38
    Mayer DK,Terrin NC,Kreps GL, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and don't seek information. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 65: 342350.
  • 39
    Rutten LJ,Arora NK,Bakos AD,Aziz N,Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980–2003). Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57: 250261.
  • 40
    FoleyKM,GelbandH, eds. Improving Palliative Care for Cancer: Summary and Recommendations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
  • 41
    Ashing-Giwa KT,Padilla GV,Tejero JS,Kim J. Breast cancer survivorship in a multiethnic sample. Cancer. 2004; 101: 450465.
  • 42
    Mathews HF. Negotiating cultural consensus in a breast cancer self-help group. Med Anthropol Q. 2000; 14: 394413.
  • 43
    Meneses KD,Yarbro CH. Cultural perspectives of international breast health and breast cancer education. J Nurs Scholar. 2007; 39: 105112.
  • 44
    Remennick L. The challenge of early breast cancer detection among immigrant and minority women in multicultural societies. Breast J. 2006; 12 ( suppl 1): S103S110.
  • 45
    Kreps GL,Kunimoto E. Effective Communication in Multicultural Health Care Settings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
  • 46
    Hisham AN,Yip CH. Overview of breast cancer in Malaysian women: a problem with late diagnosis. Asian J Surg. 2004; 27: 130133.
  • 47
    Prashanti Cancer Care Mission. Available at:http://prashantimrf.tripod.com/ Accessed February 25, 2008.
  • 48
    Guidry JJ,Matthews-Juarez P,Copeland VA. Barriers to breast cancer control for African-American women: the interdependence of culture and psychosocial issues. Cancer. 2003; 97: 318323.
  • 49
    Kornblith AB,Herndon JEII,Zuckerman E, et al. Social support as a buffer to the psychological impact of stressful life events in women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2001; 91: 443454.
  • 50
    Holland KD,Holahan CK. The relation of social support and coping to positive adaptation to breast cancer. Psychol Health. 2003; 18: 1529.
  • 51
    Goodwin PJ,Leszcz M,Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 17191726.
  • 52
    Arora NK,Rutten LJ,Gustafson DH,Moser R,Hawkins RP. Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2007; 16: 474486.
  • 53
    Decker CL. Social support and adolescent cancer survivors: a review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2007; 16: 111.
  • 54
    Taskila T,Lindbohm M,Martikainen R,Lehto U,Hakanen J,Hietanen P. Cancer survivors' received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services. Support Care Cancer. 2006; 14: 427435.
  • 55
    Shaw BR,McTavish F,Hawkins R,Gustafson DH,Pingree S. Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. J Health Commun. 2000; 5: 135139.
  • 56
    Ostberg V,Lennartsson C. Getting by with a little help: the importance of various types of social support for health problems. Scand J Public Health. 2007; 35: 197204.
  • 57
    Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57: 291308.
  • 58
    Hesse BW,Nelson DE,Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information. The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 26182624.
  • 59
    Kreps GL,Arora NK,Nelson DE. Consumer/provider communication research: directions for development. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50: 34.
  • 60
    Amir Z,Scully J,Borrill C. The professional role of breast cancer nurses in multi-disciplinary breast cancer care teams. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2004; 8: 306314.
  • 61
    Kreps GL. Communication and health education. In: RayEB,DonohewL, eds. Communication and Health: Systems and Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990: 187203.
  • 62
    Patrick K,Intille SS,Zabinski MF. An ecological framework for cancer communication: implications for research. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7: e23.
  • 63
    Maibach EW,Kreps GL,Bonaguro EW. Developing strategic communication campaigns for HIV/AIDS prevention. In: RatzanS, ed. AIDS: Effective Health Communication for the 90s. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis; 1993: 1535.
  • 64
    Kreps GL. Health communication at the population level: principles, methods, and results. In EpsteinL, ed. Culturally Competent Care. Jerusalem, Israel: National Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research; 2008 (In press).
  • 65
    MinklerM,WallersteinN, eds. Community Based Participatory Research for Health. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
  • 66
    Kreps GL,Chapelsky Massimilla D. Cancer communications research and health outcomes: review and challenge. Commun Studies. 2002; 53: 318336.
  • 67
    HornikR, ed. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002.
  • 68
    Kreps GL. One size does not fit all: adapting communication to the needs and literacy levels of individuals. Ann Fam Med. Available at: http://annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/4/3/205 Accessed on June 8, 2008.
  • 69
    Slater MD,Kelly KJ,Thackeray R. Segmentation on a shoestring: Health audience segmentation in limited-budget and local social marketing interventions. Health Promot Pract. 2006; 7: 170173.
  • 70
    Rajaram S,Rashidi A. Asian-Islamic women and breast cancer screening: a socio-cultural analysis. Women Health. 1999; 28: 4558.
  • 71
    Sadler GR,Dhanjal SK,Shah NB, et al. Asian Indian women: knowledge, attitudes and behaviors toward breast cancer early detection. Public Health Nurs. 2001; 18: 357363.
  • 72
    Donohew L,Lorch EP,Palmgreen P. Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. Hum Com Res. 1998; 24: 454468.
  • 73
    MaibachE,ParrottR, eds. Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
  • 74
    SinghalA,CodyMJ,RogersEM,SabidoM, eds. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
  • 75
    Greenberg BS,Salmon CT,Patel D,Beck V,Cole G. Evolution of an E-E research agenda. In: SinghalA,CodyMJ,RogersEM,SabidoM, eds. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 2004: 191206.
  • 76
    Beck V. Working with daytime and prime-time television shows in the United States to promote health. In: SinghalA,CodyMJ,RogersEM,SabidoM, eds. Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 2004: 207224.