• 1
    Kamangar F,Dores GM,Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across 5 continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 21372150.
  • 2
    Harris JR,Brown PK,Couglin S, et al. The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005; 2: A21.
  • 3
    Freeman HP. Poverty, culture, and social injustice: determinants of cancer disparities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54: 7277.
  • 4
    Wolff MS,Britton JA,Wilson VP. Environmental risk factors for breast cancer among African-American women. Cancer. 2003; 97(1 suppl ): 289310.
  • 5
    Krieger N. Defining and investigating social disparities in cancer: critical issues. Cancer Causes Control. 2005; 16: 514.
  • 6
    Byers T,Barrera E,Fontham ET, et al. A midpoint assessment of the American Cancer Society challenge goal to halve the U.S. cancer mortality rates between the years 1990 and 2015. Cancer. 2006; 107: 396405.
  • 7
    Ward E,Jemal A,Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54: 7893.
  • 8
    Byers T,Mouchawar J,Marks J, et al. The American Cancer Society Challenge Goals: how far can cancer rates decline in the U.S. by the year 2015? Cancer. 1999; 86: 715727.
  • 9
    Freeman HP,Vydelingum NA. The role of the special populations networks program in eliminating cancer health disparities. Cancer. 2006; 107: 19331935.
  • 10
    Partridge EE,Fouad MN,Hinton AW, et al. The Deep South Network for Cancer Control: eliminating cancer disparities through community-academic collaboration. Fam Community Health. 2005; 28: 619.
  • 11
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2008.
  • 12
    Blackman DK,Bennet EM,Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997)—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1999; 48: 122.
  • 13
    Jemal A,Murray T,Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005; 55: 1030.
  • 14
    Montz FJ,Farber FL,Bristow RE,Cornelison T. Impact of increasing Papanicolaou test sensitivity and compliance: a modeled cost and outcomes analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 97: 781788.
  • 15
    Munoz N,Bosch FX. HPV and cervical neoplasia: review of case-control and cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ. 1992; 119: 251261.
  • 16
    National Cancer Institute. What You Need to Know About Cancer of the Cervix. Screening. Available at: Accessed February 25, 2008.
  • 17
    Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Cancer Stat Fact Sheets. Cancer of the cervix uteri. 2008. Available at: Accessed May 30, 2008.
  • 18
    Paskett ED,Tatum CM,D'Agostino R, et al. Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999; 8: 453459.
  • 19
    Hiatt RA,Pasick RJ,Stewart S, et al. Community-based cancer screening for underserved women: design and baseline findings from the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 190203.
  • 20
    Eaker ED,Jaros L,Vierkant RA,Lantz P,Remington PL. Women's Health Alliance Intervention Study: description of a breast and cervical cancer screening program. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001; 7: 3135.
  • 21
    Bastani T,Berman BA,Belin TR, et al. Increasing cervical cancer screening among underserved women in a large urban county health system: can it be done? What does it take? Med Care. 2002; 40: 891907.
  • 22
    Nguyen TT,McPhee SJ,Bui-Tong N, et al. Community-based participatory research increases cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese-Americans. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006; 17(2 suppl ): 3154.
  • 23
    Hemminki K,Dong C,Vaittinen P. Familial risks in cervical cancer: is there a hereditary component? Int J Cancer. 1999; 82: 775781.
  • 24
    Hemminki K,Chen B. Familial risks for cervical tumors in full and half siblings: etiologic apportioning. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 14131414.
  • 25
    Williams KP,Sheppard VB,Todem D,Mabiso A,Wulu JTJr,Hines RD. Family matters in mammography screening among African-American women age ≥40. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008; 100: 508515.
  • 26
    Software for the Statistical Analysis of Correlated Data [computer program]. Version 9.0. Triangle Park, NC; 2005.
  • 27
    Nash D,Chan C,Horowitz D,Vlahov D. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007; 16: 4656.
  • 28
    Ostbye T,Greenberg GN,Taylor DHJr,Lee AMM. Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996–2000: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD). Ann Fam Med. 2003; 1: 209217.
  • 29
    Rakowski W,Clark MA,Ehrich B. Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42–75: associations in the 1990–1994 National Health Interview Surveys. Prev Med. 1999; 29(6 pt 1): 487495.
  • 30
    Coughlin SS,Uhler RJ,Bobo JK,Caplan L. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control. 2004; 15: 159170.
  • 31
    Swan J,Breen N,Coates RJ,Rimer BK,Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003; 97: 15281540.
  • 32
    Hosmer DW,Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2000.
  • 33
    Shah BV,Barnwell BG. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test for survey data. In: 2003 Proceedings at the Joint Statistical Meetings—Section on Survey Research Methods. San Francisco, CA: American Statistical Association; 2003.
  • 34
    Hosmer DW,Hosmer T,Le Cessie S,Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med. 1997; 16: 965980.
  • 35
    LaVange LM,Stearns SC,Lafata JE,Koch GG,Shah BV. Innovative strategies using SUDAAN for analysis of health surveys with complex samples. Stat Methods Med Res. 1996; 5: 311329.
  • 36
    Cui Y,Peterson NB,Hargreaves M, et al. Mammography use in the Southern Community Cohort Study (United States). J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007; 18(4 suppl ): 102117.
  • 37
    Weinrich S,Coker AL,Weinrich M,Eleazer GP,Greene FL. Predictors of Pap smear screening in socioeconomically disadvantaged elderly women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43: 267270.
  • 38
    Simon MS,Korczak JF,Yee CL, et al. Racial differences in the familial aggregation of breast cancer and other female cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 89: 227235.
  • 39
    National Cancer Institute. What You Need to Know About™ Cancer of the Cervix. Risk factors. Available at: Accessed February 25, 2008.
  • 40
    Kaslow NJ,Celano MP. The family therapies. In: Gurman AS,Messer SB, eds. Essential Psychotherapies: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1995.
  • 41
    Minuchin S,Baker L,Rosman BL,Liebman R,Milman L,Todd TC. A conceptual model of psychosomatic illness in children: family organization and family therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975; 32: 10311038.
  • 42
    Philips Z,Johnson S,Avis M,Whynes D. Human papillomavirus and the value of screening: young women's knowledge of cervical cancer. Health Educ Res. 2003; 18: 318328.
  • 43
    Mays VM,Cochran SO,Greer-Sullivan J. Health care for African American and Hispanic women. In: Hogue C,Hargraves M,Collins K, eds. Minority Health in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000: 97123.
  • 44
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006.
  • 45
    Behbakht K,Lynch A,Teal S,Degeest K,Massad S. Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 13551361.
  • 46
    Simoes EJ,Newschaffer CJ,Hagdrup N, et al. Predictors of compliance with recommended cervical cancer screening schedule: a population-based study. J Community Health. 1999; 24: 115130.
  • 47
    Brown N,Naman P,Homel P,Fraser-White M,Clare R,Browne R. Assessment of preventive health knowledge and behaviors of African-American and Afro-Caribbean women in urban settings. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006; 98: 16441651.
  • 48
    Magnus M. Prostate cancer knowledge among multiethnic black men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004; 96: 650656.
  • 49
    Puig-Tintore LM,Castellsague X,Torne A, et al. Coverage and factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the AFRODITA study: a population-based survey in Spain. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2008; 12: 8289.
  • 50
    Walsh JC. The impact of knowledge, perceived barriers and perceptions of risk on attendance for a routine cervical smear. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006; 11: 291296.
  • 51
    Zhang Y,Borders TF,Rohrer JE. Correlates of intent to seek unnecessary Pap tests among elderly women. Womens Health Issues. 2007; 17: 351359.
  • 52
    Paskett ED,Tatum CM,Mack DW,Hoen H,Case LD,Velez R. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996; 5: 721726.
  • 53
    McGovern PG,Lurie N,Margolis KL,Slater JS. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 14: 201208.
  • 54
    McKenna MT,Speers M,Mallin K,Warnecke R. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories. Am J Prev Med. 1992; 8: 287291.
  • 55
    Sawyer JA,Earp JA,Fletcher RH,Daye FF,Wynn TM. Accuracy of women's self-report of their last Pap smear. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79: 10361037.
  • 56
    Pizarro J,Schneider TR,Salovey P. A source of error in self-reports of Pap test utilization. J Community Health. 2002; 27: 351356.
  • 57
    Bowman JA,Redman S,Dickinson JA,Gibberd R,Sanson-Fisher RW. The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: a methodological consideration in cervical screening research. Health Serv Res. 1991; 26: 97107.