Fax: (713) 792-4689
Original Article
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy
Article first published online: 26 JAN 2009
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24129
Copyright © 2009 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Yi, M., Meric-Bernstam, F., Middleton, L. P., Arun, B. K., Bedrosian, I., Babiera, G. V., Hwang, R. F., Kuerer, H. M., Yang, W. and Hunt, K. K. (2009), Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer, 115: 962–971. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24129
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 FEB 2009
- Article first published online: 26 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 OCT 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 15 SEP 2008
- Manuscript Received: 2 JUN 2008
References
- 1,,, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Predictors of significant histologic findings. Cancer. 2004; 101: 1977-1986.Direct Link:
- 2,,, et al. Efficacy of prophylactic mastectomy in women with unilateral breast cancer: a cancer research network project. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 4275-4286.
- 3,,,. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999; 25: 584-589.
- 4,. Bilateral primary breast cancer, a prospective clinicopathological study. Cancer. 1964; 17: 1501-1527.Direct Link:
- 5,,, et al. Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999; 6: 546-552.
- 6,,, et al. Efficacy of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a personal and family history of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3938-3943.
- 7,,, et al. Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 287-292.
- 8,,,,,. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy improves the outcome of selected patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000; 180: 439-445.
- 9,,, et al. Selective use of sentinel lymph node surgery during prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer. 2006; 107: 1440-1447.Direct Link:
- 10,,,,. Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 86: 620-625.
- 11,,, et al. Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1541-1548.
- 12,,, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81: 1879-1886.
- 13,,,,. Validation of the Gail et al model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 358-366.
- 14,,,. Validation of the Gail et al model for predicting individual breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994; 86: 600-607.
- 15,,,,. Breast cancer risk correlates with level of atypia in prophylactic mastectomy (PM) specimens. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004; 11( suppl 2): S94.
- 16. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control. 1974; 19: 716-723.
- 17,,, et al. Synchronous elective contralateral mastectomy and immediate bilateral breast reconstruction in women with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998; 5: 529-538.
- 18,,. Contralateral cancerous breast lesions in women with clinical invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1986; 57: 897-903.Direct Link:
- 19,,,,,. Bilateral breast cancer. Risk reduction by contralateral biopsy. Ann Surg. 1985; 201: 667-677.
- 20,,,,,. Society of Surgical Oncology: position statement on prophylactic mastectomy. Approved by the Society of Surgical Oncology Executive Council, March 2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14: 2425-2427.
- 21,,,,. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 5203-5209.
- 22,,. Morphologic types of breast cancer: age, bilaterality, and family history. South Med J. 1980; 73: 28-32.
- 23
- 24,,,. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6: R149-R156.
- 25,,. Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma. Surgery. 1982; 91: 234-240.
- 26,,, et al. A case-control study of unilateral and bilateral breast carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2001; 91: 1845-1853.Direct Link:
- 27,,. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 56: 1038-1045.
- 28,. Epidemiology of breast cancer in older women: implications for future healthcare. Drugs Aging. 2001; 18: 761-772.
- 29,,,,. Prognostic significance of benign proliferative breast disease. Cancer. 1993; 71: 3896-3907.Direct Link:
- 30,,, et al. Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia. Cancer. 1993; 71: 1258-1265.Direct Link:
- 31,,,. A prospective study of benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1992; 267: 941-944.
- 32,,, et al. Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997; 6: 297-301.
- 33,,,,,. Atypical lobular hyperplasia as a unilateral predictor of breast cancer risk: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2003; 361: 125-129.
- 34,,, et al. Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26: 421-430.
- 35. A working model for the time sequence of genetic changes in breast tumorigenesis. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 202-216.
- 36. The long and short of chromosome 11 in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153: 5-9.
- 37,,, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1295-1303.
- 38,,, et al. Contralateral primary tumors in breast cancer patients in a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991; 83: 1299-1306.
- 39

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)