Fax: (206) 987-3946
Original Article
[F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose–positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults
Article first published online: 10 JUN 2009
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24421
Copyright © 2009 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hawkins, D. S., Conrad, E. U., Butrynski, J. E., Schuetze, S. M. and Eary, J. F. (2009), [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose–positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults. Cancer, 115: 3519–3525. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24421
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 JUL 2009
- Article first published online: 10 JUN 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 16 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 18 DEC 2008
- Manuscript Received: 27 OCT 2008
Funded by
- National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute. Grant Numbers: CA87721, CA65537
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- osteosarcoma;
- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography;
- outcome
Forty patients with extremity osteosarcoma underwent [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FDG-PET standard uptake value after chemotherapy was associated with progression-free survival.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is 1 of the most powerful prognostic factors for extremity osteosarcoma. [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose–positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a noninvasive imaging modality that is used to predict histopathologic response. To determine the prognostic value of FDG-PET response for progression-free survival (PFS) in osteosarcoma, the authors of this report reviewed the University of Washington Medical Center experience.
METHODS:
Forty patients with extremity osteosarcoma were evaluated by FDG-PET. All patients received neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. FDG-PET standard uptake values (SUVs) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SUV1) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SUV2) were analyzed and correlated with histopathologic response.
RESULTS:
The median SUV1 was 6.8 (range, 3.0-24.1), the median SUV2 was 2.3 (range, 1.2-12.8), and the median SUV2 to SUV1 ratio (SUV2:1), was 0.36 (range, 0.12-1.10). A good FDG-PET response was defined as anSUV2 <2.5 or an SUV2:1 ≤0.5. FDG-PET responses according to SUV2 and SUV2:1 were concordant with histologic response in 58% and 68% of patients, respectively. SUV2 was associated with outcome (4-year PFS, 73% for SUV2 <2.5 vs 39% for SUV2 ≥2.5; P = .021). Both the initial disease stage and the histologic response were associated with outcome.
CONCLUSIONS:
FDG-PET imaging of extremity osteosarcoma was correlated only partially with a histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An SUV2 <2.5 was associated with improved PFS. Future prospective studies are warranted to determine whether FDG-PET imaging may be used as a predictor of outcome independent of initial disease stage. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
1097-0142/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a7299bc18f075294c232ade468773cd0672bd470)