• 1
    Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates DW. The use of health information technology in 7 nations. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77: 848-854.
  • 2
    Gray JAM, de Lusignan S. National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). BMJ. 1999; 319: 1476-1479.
  • 3
    Sucher JF, Moore FA, Todd SR, Sailors RM, McKinley BA. Computerized clinical decision support: a technology to implement and validate evidence based guidelines. J Trauma. 2008; 64: 520-537.
  • 4
    Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 2741-2747.
  • 5
    Vadher B, Patterson DL, Leaning M. Evaluation of a decision support system for initiation and control of oral anticoagulation in a randomised trial. BMJ. 1997; 314: 1252-1256.
  • 6
    Feldstein AC, Smith DH, Perrin N, et al. Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions. A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 1848-1854.
  • 7
    Gandhi TK, Bartel SB, Shulman LN, et al. Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting. Cancer. 2005; 104: 2477-2483.
  • 8
    Voeffray M, Pannatier A, Stupp R, Fucina N, Leyvraz S, Wasserfallen J-B. Effect of computerisation on the quality and safety of chemotherapy prescription. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 418-421.
  • 9
    Greenberg A, Kramer S, Welch V, O'Sullivan E, Hall S. Cancer Care Ontario's computerized physician order entry system: a province-wide patient safety innovation. Healthcare Q. 2006; 9(special issue): 108-113.
  • 10
    British Columbia Cancer Agency. Health Professionals Info. Available at: accessed January 7, 2009.
  • 11
    Cancer Care Ontario. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.
  • 12
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Available at: Accessed August 10, 2009.
  • 13
    Macmillan Cancer Support. Health Professionals. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.
  • 14
    Cancer Institute NSW. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.
  • 15
    Leviton LC, Orleans CT. Promoting the uptake of evidence in clinical practice: a prescription for action. Clin Perinatol. 2003; 30: 403-417.
  • 16
    Safran C, Rind DM, Davis RB, et al. Guidelines for management of HIV infection with computer-based patient's record. Lancet. 1995; 346: 341-346.
  • 17
    Smith DH, Perrin N, Feldstein A, et al. The impact of prescribing safety alerts for elderly persons in an electronic medical record. An interrupted time series evaluation. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166: 1098-1104.
  • 18
    Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Grannemann BD, Altshuler KZ, Sunderajan P. A computerized clinical decision support system as a means of implementing depression guidelines. Psychiatr Serv. 2004; 55: 879-885.
  • 19
    Kuilboer MM, van Wijk MA, Mosseveld M, et al. Computed critiquing integrated into daily clinical practice affects physicians' behavior—a randomized clinical trial with AsthmaCritic. Methods Inf Med. 2006; 45: 447-454.
  • 20
    Hains IM, Bichel-Findlay J, Rushton S, Booth A, Ward R, Pearson S-A. Barriers to using web-based chemotherapy protocols in Australian hospitals – The Nurse Perspective. Presented at the National Medicines Symposium; May 14–16, 2008; Canberra, Australia.
  • 21
    Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1990.
  • 22
    Locock L, Dopson S, Chambers D, Gabbay J. Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness. Soc Sci Med. 2001; 53: 745-757.
  • 23
    Zaidi STR, Marriott JL, Nation RL. The role of perceptions of clinicians in their adoption of a web-based antibiotic approval system: do perceptions translate into actions? Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77: 33-40.
  • 24
    Pare G, Sicotte C, Jacques H. The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13: 197-205.
  • 25
    Gregory C, Cifaldi M, Tanner LA. Targeted intervention programs: creating a customized practice model to improve the treatment of allergic rhinitis in a managed care population. Am J Manag Care. 1999; 5: 485-496.
  • 26
    Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004; 82: 581-629.
  • 27
    Soumerai SB, McLaughlin TJ, Gurwitz JH, et al. Effect of local medical opinion leaders on quality of care for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1358-1363.
  • 28
    Avorn J, Soumerai SB. Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based “detailing.” N Engl J Med. 1983; 308: 1457-1463.
  • 29
    Siegel D, Lopez J, Meier J, et al. Academic detailing to improve antihypertensive prescribing patterns. Am J Hypertens. 2003; 16: 508-511.
  • 30
    Fender GRK, Prentice A, Gorst T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of educational package on management of menorrhagia in primary care: the Anglia menorrhagia education study. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1246-1250.
  • 31
    Bowles EJA, Tuzzio L, Wiese CJ, et al. Understanding high-quality cancer care: a summary of expert perspectives. Cancer. 2008; 112: 934-942.
  • 32
    Graudins LV, Gazarian M. Celecoxib use and overuse—too much “celebration”? J Pharm Pract Res. 2002; 32: 104-107.
  • 33
    Brown SA, Massey AP, Montoya-Weiss MM, Burkman JR. Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. Eur J Inf Syst. 2002; 11: 283-295.
  • 34
    Granlien MF, Hertzum M, Gudmundsen J. The gap between actual and mandated use of an electronic medication record 3 years after deployment. In: AndersenSK, KleinMCA, SchulzS, AartsJ, MazzoleniMC, eds. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol 136. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press; 2008: 419-424.
  • 35
    Hysong SJ, Best RG, Pugh JA. Clinical practice guideline implementation strategy patterns in Veterans Affairs primary care clinics. Health Services Res. 2007; 42( 1 pt 1): 84-103.