SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • breast cancer;
  • chemotherapy;
  • cardiotoxicity;
  • congestive heart failure;
  • Medicare

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of chemotherapy-associated cardiac toxicity, including cardiac dysrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and conduction disorders among breast cancer patients with up to 16 years of follow-up.

METHODS:

The authors studied 19,478 women aged >65 diagnosed with breast cancer in 1991-1997 from 16 regions in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Incidence density and cumulative incidence of cardiac toxicities were calculated, and the time-to-event (cardiac toxicity) analysis was conducted by using the Cox hazard regression model.

RESULTS:

The excess cumulative incidence of congestive heart failure in Year 10 among patients receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy compared with patients without chemotherapy was 4.7% (31.9% vs 27.2%). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, patients receiving anthracyclines were 25% more likely to have congestive heart failure compared with those without chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.46). Those receiving other agents did not have a significantly elevated risk of developing congestive heart failure. The adjusted risk of cardiomyopathy was 2-fold higher in women who received anthracyclines (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.44-2.62) and was 16% higher in those receiving other agents (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.97-1.39) compared with those without chemotherapy. The increased risk for developing congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac dysrhythmias in association with chemotherapy were similar after adjusting for hypertension and diabetes. The risk of ischemic heart disease and conduction disorders were not significantly different among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens were associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac dysrhythmias, but not significantly associated with ischemic heart disease or conduction disorders. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

The frequency and severity of chemotherapy-associated toxicities are generally the secondary outcome measures of randomized clinical trials, after the primary endpoint on the efficacy of chemotherapy agents. For example, anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy has been among the most active agents in treating breast cancer and has been beneficial in improving the disease-free and overall survival over the past 2 decades.1 Such trials prospectively collect the most comprehensive and systematic data on adverse events in a monitored setting. In fact, the toxicity profiles of various drugs are often established under such “ideal world” conditions in premarketing clinical trials before approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).2 This process is particularly true for reporting side effects associated with administration of systemic chemotherapy.3-15 However, clinical trials generally have rigid eligibility criteria, often excluding elderly patients, pregnant women, patients with multiple coexisting diseases, and those taking medications suspected of interacting with the study drug.16, 17 Therefore, study participants (motivated volunteers) in clinical trials often represent a much more homogeneous patient population in terms of gender, age, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity, and they are not representative of the population at large, particularly the elderly population who are often substantially underrepresented in clinical trials.16 Furthermore, clinical trials may not have adequate statistical power to detect rare events or have sufficient follow-up to identify long-term toxicities. Hence, the current system of postmarketing surveillance of long-term toxicities requires substantial improvement.17-30 One approach to obtaining more complete information on drug toxicity is to supplement data from premarketing clinical trials with data from postmarketing drug surveillance to produce better estimates. However, there is a paucity of information on cancer chemotherapy-related toxicities from population-based studies.31, 32

Several reports have been published on chemotherapy-associated cardiac complications, particularly anthracycline-containing agents that are known to be associated with a range of cardiotoxic syndromes.11-13 Cardiotoxicity may occur either immediately at the time of drug administration or months to years after treatment. Two studies recently examined the incidence of congestive heart failure associated with chemotherapy for breast cancer and found a 14% to 35% increase in risks for those receiving chemotherapy.31, 32 The objectives of the current analysis were to extend the scope of these studies: 1) to determine the anthracycline-related risk of a wider range of cardiac disorders, including cardiac dysrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and conduction disorders; 2) to determine a more accurate estimate of chemotherapy-associated cardiac toxicity by restricting the study cohort to those without preexisting cardiac disease; and 3) to examine patients with long-term follow-up extending up to 16 years to identify late cardiac toxicities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References

Data Sources

This study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database for Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with breast cancer. The SEER program, supported by the National Cancer Institute, includes population-based tumor registries in selected geographic areas in 1991-1997: San Francisco/Oakland, Detroit, Seattle, Atlanta, Rural Georgia, Los Angeles county, the San Jose–Monterey area; and the states of Connecticut, Iowa, New Mexico, Utah, and Hawaii, covering >14% of the US population.32 The Medicare program provides payments for hospital, physician and outpatient medical services for >97% of persons aged ≥65. The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects approved this study.

Study Population

The study population comprised 32,004 women diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stages I-IV breast cancer as the only primary tumor at age ≥65 years in 1991-1997, who had full coverage of Medicare Parts A and B, and were not enrolled with Health Maintenance Organizations from the year of diagnosis to the last follow-up (December 2005 or date of death). We studied patients from only 1991-1997 to examine the long-term risk of cardiac toxicity associated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and to minimize the potential impact or confounding of trastuzumab that was a new agent since 1998, which was reported to be associated with an increased risk of cardiac toxicity. For the purpose of this study in determining the relation between chemotherapy and cardiotoxicities, we included patients who were free of cardiovascular diseases at the time of cancer diagnosis, specifically congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, cardiac dysrhythmias, conduction disorders, and ischemic heart disease. By doing so, we excluded 11,489 cases with preexisting cardiac diseases, 808 cases who received first chemotherapy after 12 months of diagnosis, and 229 cases with mitoxanthrone, leaving 19,478 subjects for the final analysis.

Variables

Outcome Variables on Cardiac-Toxicities

Patients were defined to have been diagnosed with cardiac diseases when there were at least 2 claims from the ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes34 with >30 days apart after the date of breast cancer diagnosis: congestive heart failure (diagnosis code, 428.x), cardiomyopathy (diagnosis code, 425.x), cardiac dysrhythmia (diagnosis code, 427.x), conduction disorder (diagnosis code, 426.x), and ischemic heart disease (diagnosis codes, 410.x, 411.x, 412.x, 413.x, or 414.x). The time in days was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of the first claim for cardiac condition.

Chemotherapy and Other Treatments

Patients were defined as having received chemotherapy if any of the following procedure codes for chemotherapy were present in the inpatient, physician, or outpatient claims within 12 months of breast cancer diagnosis35: the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 9925 and V codes of V58.1, V66.2, or V67.2; the Common Procedure Terminology codes of 96,400-96,549, J8510, J8520, J8521, J8530-J8999, J9000-J9999 and Q0083-Q0085; and revenue center codes of 0331, 0332, and 0335. Of these patients, those who received anthracycline-containing regimens were defined when there were claims for doxorubicin (J9000, J9001, or J9010). A small number of 229 subjects with mitoxanthrone (J9293) were not included in the study cohort. Thus, patients were classified into 3 mutually exclusive groups: 1) anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (n = 1104); 2) nonanthracycline chemotherapy (n = 3398); or 3) no-chemotherapy (n = 14,986). Breast-conserving surgery, or mastectomy, or radiation therapy36 were defined previously.

Socioeconomic Status

The percentage of persons living below the poverty line at the census tract level from the 1990 census for cases between 1991 and 1997 was used to define the socioeconomic status (SES). These percentages were classified into quartiles: ≤3.62%, 3.63%-6.62%, 6.63%-11.99%, and ≥12.00% (poorest SES).

Comorbidity Index

Comorbidity was ascertained from Medicare claims by identifying comorbid conditions between 1 year before and 1 month after the diagnosis of breast cancer, including diabetes, liver disease, and dementia, but excluding any malignant tumors. Detailed methods for creating a weighted comorbidity score have been previously reported.37

Analysis

Differences in the distribution of baseline characteristics among the 3 chemotherapy groups were tested using the chi-square statistic. Incidence rate (density) was defined as the ratio of the number of new cardiac disorders over the total person-years. Person-years were calculated as the number of patients multiplied by the number of years from diagnosis to the date of the first cardiac toxicity, date of death, or date of last follow-up, whichever occurred first. The cumulative incidence (probability) of cardiotoxicity was calculated using the statistical program by Penman and Johnson.38 The Cox hazard regression model was used to perform the time-to-event (toxicity) analysis by using the PHREG procedure available in SAS (Cary, NC: SAS System).

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References

Table 1 presents the distribution of baseline characteristics among the 3 groups of patients stratified by chemotherapy status. Of the 19,478 patients with breast cancer at ages 65-89 years in 1991-1997, 5.7% received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 17.4% received other chemotherapy agents (of which 45.6% were flurouracil and 9.6% were taxanes), and 76.9% did not receive chemotherapy. A higher proportion of younger or married women received chemotherapy; 50.5% of patients aged 65-69 years received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, 36.3% received other chemotherapy, and 23.9% received no chemotherapy. A slightly lower percentage of Caucasians received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in distribution across the quartiles of SES. A higher percentage of patients with earlier stage disease, small tumor size, fewer positive lymph nodes, well-differentiated tumors, and positive hormone receptor status did not receive chemotherapy. Patients with no comorbidities were more likely to receive chemotherapy. A higher proportion of women with bilateral breast cancer and bilateral mastectomies and those in recent years received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. There was no claim for epirubicin (J9178) in these patients.

Table 1. Comparisons of Characteristics Among Women With Breast Cancer According to the Receipt of Chemotherapy
 No. (Column %) of Cases
No Chemotherapy (n=14,986)Other Chemotherapy (n=3388)Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy (n=1104)
No.%No.%No.%
Median age (range)75 (65-89)72 (65-89)70 (65-89)
Age, y      
 65-69357723.9122936.355850.5
 70-74393426.3106231.433830.6
 75-79356923.867820.016815.2
 80-84253516.93189.4322.9
 85-8913719.21013.080.7
Race/Ethnicity      
 Caucasian13,26188.5300788.794785.8
 African American8205.51925.7898.1
 Other9056.01895.6686.2
Marital status      
 Married628141.9168049.657952.5
 Unmarried820654.8162147.950145.4
 Unknown4993.3872.6242.2
Socioeconomic status      
 First quartile (high)378125.288226.030928.0
 Second quartile382425.581424.026223.7
 Third quartile383925.687825.927825.2
 Fourth quartile (low)331722.276922.723321.0
 Missing2251.5451.3222.0
Tumor stage      
 I812454.2110032.5645.8
 II398426.6139841.346942.5
 III6904.63379.929026.3
 IV7104.72988.819017.2
 Unstaged14789.92557.5918.2
Tumor size, cm      
 <1304020.338311.3393.5
 1-1.9535235.7103330.517115.5
 2-2.9264817.771321.021019.0
 3-3.910687.138011.213712.4
 ≥414669.854916.237033.5
 Missing14129.43309.717716.0
No. of positive lymph nodes      
 0 (negative)858957.3143642.412611.4
 18835.935310.4958.6
 2-35983.93169.311310.2
 4-94382.93109.218917.1
 10-512621.82196.519617.7
 Missing421628.175422.338534.9
Tumor grade      
 Well differentiated218214.62768.2413.7
 Moderately differentiated498333.3103530.626023.6
 Poorly differentiated350523.4122136.054649.5
 Unknown/Missing431628.885625.325723.3
Hormone receptor status      
 Positive991369.2206961.154449.3
 Negative13298.968420.231028.1
 Unknown374424.963518.725022.6
Comorbidity scores      
 011,51776.9272580.491683.0
 1262217.552715.615514.0
 ≥28475.71364.0332.9
Primary therapy      
 No cancer-directed surgery7905.31594.712211.1
 Breast conserving surgery610340.7112933.325523.1
 Mastectomy809354.0210062.072765.9
Radiotherapy to chest      
 Right-side925861.8178652.740436.6
 Left-side279218.676822.732829.7
 Both sides or unknown291019.482024.236533.1
 No radiotherapy260.2140.470.6
Year of diagnosis      
 1991239316.051715.31039.3
 1992217314.552915.612611.4
 1993211414.146513.71059.5
 1994205513.746013.614613.2
 1995208013.947213.916815.2
 1996203313.642412.519617.8
 1997213814.352115.426023.6
Total14,986100.03388100.01104100.0

Table 2 presents the incidence rate (density) of cardiac toxicities stratified by chemotherapy status and age. For example, the incidence of congestive heart failure in patients aged 65-69 years who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was 33.2 per 10,000 person years, compared with 22.3 for those receiving nonanthracycline chemotherapy and 18.5 for those not receiving chemotherapy. Overall, incidence rates increased with advanced age for all 5 cardiac conditions. Incidence rates of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac dysrhythmia were generally the highest in patients receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, and the lowest in those without chemotherapy except among the oldest old patients (aged 85-89 years). This is in contrast to the incidence rates of ischemic heart disease and conduction disorders, which did not strongly correlate with chemotherapy status.

Table 2. Incidence Density of Cardiac Toxicity by Chemotherapy Status and Age
Age, yIncidence Density of Cardiac Toxicity (No. of Cases With Cardiac Conditions Per 10,000 Person-Years)
No ChemotherapyNonanthracycline ChemotherapyAnthracycline-Containing Chemotherapy
Congestive heart failure
 65-6918.522.333.2
 70-7427.532.337.7
 75-7940.847.366.2
 80-8461.658.897.8
 85-8983.675.871.5
Cardiomyopathy
 65-694.35.811.3
 70-744.65.513.0
 75-795.57.019.9
 80-845.88.513.4
 85-896.43.782.4
Cardiac dysrhythmia
 65-6932.939.645.5
 70-7442.045.261.3
 75-7952.059.361.4
 80-8463.259.5128.5
 85-8980.272.5130.9
Ischemic heart disease
 65-6933.737.734.9
 70-7440.643.344.3
 75-7949.552.859.5
 80-8460.558.7129.8
 85-8971.359.835.7
Conduction disorder
 65-695.96.16.4
 70-748.59.213.8
 75-7911.010.79.1
 80-8414.512.20.0
 85-8918.315.20.0

Table 3 presents the cumulative incidence (probability) of congestive heart failure over the 15-year period and was stratified into 3 groups according to chemotherapy status. The incidence probability was 3.1% in Year 1 for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and 1.5% for other chemotherapy compared with 1.6% for the no chemotherapy group. Cumulative incidence in Year 10 was 31.9%, 26.4%, and 27.2%, respectively, for the above-mentioned 3 groups, indicating that the excess incidence was 4.7% among patients receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, and there was no excess incidence in patients with nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with patients without chemotherapy. Cumulative incidence for congestive heart failure and other 4 cardiac conditions was presented in Figure 1. For example, cumulative incidence curves for congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy were notably different among the 3 groups with the highest incidence rate in patients receiving anthracyclines and lowest in those without chemotherapy, whereas the incidence curves were not much different for other cardiac conditions among the 3 groups. By Year 10 of follow-up, the number at risk for congestive heart failure was 246 (22.2% of the baseline) for anthracyclines group, 1261 (37.2%) for other chemotherapy group, and 6094 (40.7) for no-chemotherapy group. The incidence at Year 10 was generally low at 6.9%, 6.5%, and 6.2%, respectively, for the 3 groups.

thumbnail image

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of (A) congestive heart failure, (B) cardiomyopathy, (C) cardiac dysrhythmia, (D) ischemic heart disease, and (E) conduction disorder by chemotherapy status are shown.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 3. Cumulative Incidence Probabilities of Having Congestive Heart Failure by Chemotherapy Use
Follow-Up Time, yNo. at Risk in Each Time IntervalNo. With Congestive Heart FailureCumulative Incidence Probability95% CI
  • CI indicates confidence interval.

  • *

    Reported to avoid the cell size of <5 cases as required by the data user agreement.

Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy  
0110400.000
1961330.0310.022-0.043
2771230.0570.044-0.073
3675200.0830.066-0.103
4586250.1180.098-0.142
5517250.1570.133-0.185
6474150.1830.156-0.213
7441130.2050.177-0.237
8411130.2290.200-0.263
9350260.2790.246-0.316
10246170.3190.283-0.359
1116770.3420.304-0.384
12111130.4000.354-0.449
137080.4540.399-0.512
143680.5290.461-0.600
≥1511<5*0.5940.511-0.679
Nonanthracycline chemotherapy  
0338800.000
13134500.0150.012-0.020
22879520.0320.026-0.039
32668530.0500.043-0.059
42479580.0720.063-0.081
52317660.0970.086-0.108
62176550.1190.107-0.131
72032650.1450.133-0.159
81901700.1750.161-0.190
916651050.2220.206-0.239
101261810.2640.247-0.282
11959730.3110.292-0.331
12690580.3580.336-0.380
13482440.4050.381-0.429
14276400.4650.438-0.494
≥15100210.5180.485-0.552
No chemotherapy   
014,98600.000
113,7742380.0160.015-0.019
212,9582190.0300.030-0.036
312,1632770.0540.050-0.058
411,4432730.0750.071-0.080
510,7603110.1010.096-0.106
610,1113220.1280.123-0.134
794493450.1580.152-0.165
887883620.1910.184-0.198
978794300.2320.224-0.239
1060943770.2720.264-0.280
1145733540.3190.310-0.328
1232522960.3690.359-0.379
1322032100.4160.405-0.427
1412301950.4790.466-0.492
≥15472990.5350.519-0.551

Table 4 presents the multivariate time-to-event (toxicity) analysis for the relative risk (hazard ratio) of developing various types of cardiac conditions. Patients treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were 25% significantly more likely to develop congestive heart failure compared with those without chemotherapy, after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics (HR, 1.25; 95% CI,1.07-1.46). Those receiving other chemotherapy did not have a significantly elevated risk of developing congestive heart failure. The adjusted risk of developing cardiomyopathy was twice as likely in women with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.44-2.62) and was 16% higher in those treated with other chemotherapy (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.9710-1.39) compared with those without chemotherapy. The risk of cardiac dysrhythmia was also slightly but significantly elevated in women with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33) compared with those without chemotherapy. However, the risk of ischemic heart disease and conduction disorders was not significantly different in women with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy and in those who received other chemotherapy compared with those without chemotherapy. The risk of cardiac toxicities remained similar after adjusting for several known preexisting risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as hypertension and diabetes. For example, after adjusting for both hypertension and diabetes, the hazard ratio in patients receiving anthracyclines compared with no chemotherapy was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.09-1.49) for congestive heart failure, 1.98 (95% CI, 1.47-2.67) for cardiomyopathy, 1.17 (95% CI, 1.02-1.34) for cardiac dysrhythmia, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.87-1.16) for ischemic heart disease, and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.74-1.39) for conduction disorders. These hazard ratios were similar to those summarized in Table 4 without adjusting for hypertension and diabetes.

Table 4. Hazard Ratio of Cardiac Toxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Patient and Tumor CharacteristicsHazard Ratio* (95% CI) of Having Cardiac Toxicity
Congestive Heart FailureCardiomyopathyCardiac DysrhythmiaIschemic Heart DiseaseConduction Disorder
  • CI indicates confidence interval.

  • *

    Hazard ratio was adjusted for variables listed in the table, plus ethnicity, marital status, socioeconomic status, tumor stage, size, grade, number of positive lymph nodes, hormone receptor status, surgery, and year of diagnosis.

Chemotherapy     
 No chemotherapy1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Other chemotherapy1.03 (0.88-1.11)1.16 (0.97-1.39)1.06 (1.00-1.14)1.05 (0.99-1.13)0.97 (0.83-1.12)
 Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy1.25 (1.07-1.46)1.95 (1.44-2.62)1.16 (1.02-1.33)0.99 (0.86-1.15)1.00 (0.73-1.37)
Age, y     
 65-691.001.001.001.001.00
 70-741.47 (1.35-1.60)1.06 (0.89-1.26)1.29 (1.21-1.38)1.25 (1.17-1.34)1.55 (1.33-1.80)
 75-792.23 (2.06-2.43)1.34 (1.11-1.62)1.68 (1.57-1.80)1.61 (1.50-1.73)1.98 (1.70-2.31)
 80-843.38 (3.08-3.70)1.46 (1.15-1.85)2.20 (2.02-2.38)2.13 (1.96-2.32)2.78 (2.33-3.32)
 85-894.96 (4.25-5.50)1.71 (1.23-2.39)3.16 (2.84-3.52)2.88 (2.58-3.22)3.93 (3.13-4.93)
Race/Ethnicity     
 Caucasians1.001.001.001.001.00
 African Americans1.34 (1.19-1.50)1.94 (1.51-2.49)1.31 (1.18-1.46)1.44 (1.30-1.60)1.48 (1.18-1.85)
 Others0.76 (0.67-0.87)0.94 (0.70-1.26)0.73 (0.66-0.82)0.87 (0.78-0.97)0.72 (0.56-0.93)
Comorbidity scores     
 01.001.001.001.001.00
 11.95 (1.82-2.08)1.66 (1.40-1.96)1.49 (1.40-1.58)1.82 (1.71-1.93)1.48 (1.30-1.69)
 ≥22.65 (2.38-2.95)2.25 (1.70-2.97)1.69 (1.51-1.89)2.48 (2.25-2.75)1.69 (1.33-2.15)
Radiotherapy to chest     
 Right side1.001.001.001.001.00
 Left side1.14 (1.04-1.24)1.00 (0.80-1.24)1.09 (1.01-1.18)1.12 (1.03-1.22)1.02 (0.86-1.22)
 Both sides or unknown1.01 (0.93-1.11)1.14 (0.93-1.40)1.01 (0.93-1.08)1.06 (0.98-1.15)1.05 (0.89-1.23)
 No radiotherapy1.35 (0.71-2.56)1.91 (0.45-8.20)1.20 (0.68-2.12)1.66 (0.92-2.99)1.77 (0.55-5.73)

Table 4 also presents the risk of cardiac toxicities in association with other factors including age, comorbidity, and radiotherapy. The risk of all cardiac toxicities increased significantly with age and comorbidity scores. Compared with those patients who received radiation to the right chest, women treated with radiation to the left side were 14% more likely to develop congestive heart failure, 9% more likely to develop cardiac dysrhythmia, and 12% more likely to develop ischemic heart disease, but they had no significant elevated risk of developing cardiomyopathy and conduction disorders.

Table 5 presents the risk of cardiac toxicity in association with the number of chemotherapy claims as a proxy measure for the number of chemotherapy cycles, stratified by tumor stage. In those with stage I-IIIA, patients receiving 5 to 9 doses and ≥10 doses of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were more likely to develop congestive heart failure compared with those without chemotherapy but with wide confidence intervals due to small numbers after stratification (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.99-2.38, and HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.88-1.67, respectively). In those with advanced stage disease (IIIB-IV) or unstaged, patients receiving ≥10 doses of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were 37% more likely to develop congestive heart failure (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.80-2.34). Patients receiving only 1 to 4 doses of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy or other chemotherapy had slightly elevated but nonsignificant risk of congestive heart failure in patients with late stage. There was also a strong dose-response relation between the receipt of anthracyclines and the risk of developing cardiomyopathy. Higher doses of anthracyclines were also associated with slightly elevated risks of cardiac dysrhythmia and ischemic heart disease, but not with conduction disorders.

Table 5. Hazard Ratio of Cardiac Toxicity in Patients With Breast Cancer by the No. of Chemotherapy Claims and Tumor Stage
No. of Chemotherapy Claims (Doses)No. of CasesHazard Ratio* (95% CI) of Having Cardiac Toxicity
Congestive Heart FailureCardiomyopathyCardiac DysrhythmiaIschemic Heart DiseaseConduction Disorder
  • CI indicates confidence interval.

  • *

    Hazard ratio was adjusted for variables listed in the table, plus ethnicity, marital status, socioeconomic status, tumor stage, size, grade, number of positive lymph nodes, hormone receptor status, surgery, and year of diagnosis.

Tumor stage I-IIIA      
 No chemotherapy12,3871.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Nonanthracycline chemotherapy      
   1-412410.99 (0.89-1.11)0.93 (0.69-1.24)1.10 (1.00-1.20)1.06 (0.97-1.17)1.03 (0.84-1.26)
   5-94941.01 (0.84-1.21)1.52 (1.07-2.17)0.95 (0.81-1.12)1.16 (0.99-1.35)0.96 (0.68-1.35)
   ≥109271.08 (0.94-1.48)0.95 (0.67-1.36)1.06 (0.93-1.20)0.97 (0.85-1.11)1.03 (0.78-1.36)
 Anthracycline chemotherapy      
   1-44121.17 (0.93-1.48)1.47 (0.95-2.26)1.00 (0.83-1.21)1.03 (0.85-1.24)1.07 (0.70-1.62)
   5-91841.21 (0.88-1.67)2.55 (1.56-4.16)1.31 (1.03-1.67)1.16 (0.89-1.51)1.32 (0.77-2.26)
   ≥10601.54 (0.99-2.38)2.35 (1.18-4.67)1.28 (0.91-1.81)1.28 (0.89-1.84)0.38 (0.09-1.52)
Tumor stage IIIB-IV or unstaged      
 No chemotherapy25991.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)1.00 (ref)
 Nonanthracycline chemotherapy      
   1-43471.05 (0.83-1.33)1.10 (0.59-2.04)1.01 (0.81-1.26)0.89 (0.69-1.14)9.92 (0.55-1.54)
   5-91370.99 (0.68-1.44)1.52 (0.63-3.63)1.26 (0.90-1.76)0.80 (0.52-1.25)1.02 (0.46-2.25)
   ≥102420.96 (0.73-1.26)0.99 (0.46-2.10)0.82 (0.61-1.09)1.01 (0.75-1.36)0.22 (0.07-0.69)
 Anthracycline chemotherapy      
   1-42300.98 (0.68-1.40)2.14 (1.14-4.03)1.11 (0.82-1.51)0.77 (0.54-1.12)0.40 (0.16-0.96)
   5-91561.25 (0.86-1.83)3.83 (2.00-7.35)1.44 (1.04-2.00)1.29 (0.87-1.91)1.07 (0.49-2.32)
   ≥10621.37 (0.80-2.34)4.68 (2.16-10.14)1.63 (1.07-2.48)1.37 (0.83-2.27)0.69 (0.20-2.34)

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References

The potential long-term cardiac risk that results from anthracycline-containing chemotherapy is relatively well-studied in children,39 but it is less well-studied in adult patients with cancer, particularly in the elderly population. Our study sought to examine whether anthracycline-based or nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy is associated with the increased risk of dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, and conduction disorders, in addition to congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy. The overview of the 194 randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy with up to 15 years of follow-up by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group1 reported that the relative risk of death from heart disease was 1.33 in women receiving anthracycline-based versus nonanthracycline-based chemotherapy. However, this overview did not report the incidence of heart disease and did not differentiate between the various types of heart disease. Our study showed a relative risk (HR, 1.25) for the incidence of congestive heart failure in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy compared with those without chemotherapy in 1991-1997 with up to 16 years of follow-up. Also, our study showed an excess risk of incidence of 4.7% in patients receiving anthracyclines compared with those without chemotherapy, whereas there was a survival advantage of 4.2% in patients receiving anthracyclines as reported in the above overview of clinical trials.1 This is consistent with the current literature illustrating that anthracyclines prolong survival while carrying a risk of cardiac toxicitiy.40-45

A recent study of 1176 patients from the Southwest Oncology Trial40 concluded that exposure to doxorubicin did not increase the risk of adverse cardiac effects (specifically deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction). However, although left ventricular ejection fraction is a marker for advanced myocyte damage, approximately half of all heart failure diagnosed in the United States occurs in patients who maintain a normal left ventricular ejection fraction.41 Therefore, the association between anthracycline use and risk of late heart failure could be underestimated if the estimate is based on left ventricular ejection fraction alone. A notable finding from our study is that the risk of cardiac toxicity had a dose-response relation with chemotherapy particularly among those patients who received 10 or more doses of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The above-mentioned findings remain similar after controlling for preexisting hypertension and diabetes. Conversely, there were no significant associations between the risk of ischemic heart disease and conduction disorder and the use of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

This study possesses several strengths. First, Medicare claims cover all medical services provided, including inpatient hospitalization, outpatient clinics, and physician office visits, regardless of where patients sought medical care in the United States, thus ensuring more comprehensive information on treatment and associated medical conditions. Second, a large retrospective cohort of breast cancer patients had been followed up for up to 16 years, allowing for more adequate assessment of long-term or late toxicities that may be associated with chemotherapy administration. Third, SEER-Medicare data not only provide well-validated pathologic information on tumor characteristics (stage and histology) at diagnosis but also allow for the examination of socioeconomic factors. Furthermore, comorbid conditions can be identified from Medicare data. Because comorbidity is a known confounder for treatment and cardiac conditions, controlling for comorbidity becomes critical in minimizing residual confounding when addressing the cardiac risk associated with chemotherapy.

It is important to note some limitations of this study. First, Medicare claims have limited information on the dose and intensity of chemotherapy administered that could have affected the occurrence and severity of cardiac toxicities. This study relied on common procedure codes that specified standard dose for each chemotherapy agent; but, in practice, physicians may have modified a standard chemotherapy dose for an individual patient according to preexisting medical conditions or tolerability. Furthermore, we used the number of chemotherapy claims as a proxy measure for the number of cycles of chemotherapy administered. Although this study demonstrated an interesting dose-response relationship between number of cycles of chemotherapy and the risk of developing cardiac toxicity, which is consistent with clinical trial reports, the estimates could potentially be diluted because of the lack of “true” cycles and doses that can be obtained in closely monitored trials. Third, although Medicare claims on overall chemotherapy administration have been externally validated, the validity of claims on cardiac disorders has not been well-studied. There may also be potential surveillance bias in ascertaining the cardiac outcomes. For example, patients after receiving anthracyclines may be more likely to see their physicians for check-ups and more likely to be labeled as having congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy, leading to differential misclassification bias. Conversely, some patients may have had preexisting cardiomyopathy or low left ventricular ejection fraction, but they may not be labeled as suffering from this condition, leading to nondifferential misclassification bias. There may also be potential selection bias when physicians make decisions on the prescription of chemotherapy based on individual's cardiac function or performance status. Although we excluded those with history of cardiovascular diseases, some unmeasured preclinical symptoms that are related with heart disease could potentially lead to selection bias. Also, the number of patients was large at baseline, but after more than 10 years of follow-up, the number of patients became smaller, which could affect the stability of incidence estimates. In addition, if patients had private medical services with claims that were not filed with Medicare for reimbursement, these data might be missed, thus leading to bias toward diluting the exposure-outcomes association. Furthermore, this study did not address physician or hospital characteristics that might be associated with selection of chemotherapy and intensity of surveillance for monitoring patients.

In conclusion, anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of developing congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and cardiac dysrhythmias, but it was not significantly associated with the development of ischemic heart disease and conduction disorders. Other (nonanthracycline) chemotherapy agents were not significantly associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure and conduction disorders, but they were associated with a slightly elevated risk of cardiomyopathy, dysrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References

This study was supported by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01-HS016743).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  4. RESULTS
  5. DISCUSSION
  6. Conflict of Interest Disclosures
  7. References
  • 1
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365: 1687-1717.
  • 2
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Managing the Risks From Medical Product Use. Pt III: How does FDA conduct postmarketing surveillance and risk assessment? Available at: http://www.fda.gov/oc/tfrm/Part3.html Accessed May 11, 2006.
  • 3
    Perry MC, Yarbro JW. Toxicity of chemotherapy. Orlando, Florida: Grune & Stratton; 1984.
  • 4
    Baquiran DC. Lippincott's Cancer Chemotherapy Handbook. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
  • 5
    Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU, Marcus CE, Smith TL. Immediate and long-term toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens containing doxorubicin in trials at M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute. NCI Monogr. 1986; 105-109.
  • 6
    Fisher B, Anderson S, DeCillis A, et al. Further evaluation of intensified and increased total dose of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-25. J Clin Oncol. 1999; 17: 3374-3388.
  • 7
    Shapiro CL, et al. Side Effects of Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1997-2008.
  • 8
    Crivellari D, Bonetti M, Castiglione-Gertsch M, et al. Burdens and benefits of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil and tamoxifen for elderly patients with breast cancer: the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18: 1412-1422.
  • 9
    Partridge AH, Burstein HJ, Winer EP. Side effects of chemotherapy and combined chemohormonal therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001; 135-142.
  • 10
    Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, Mahoney MR, Krook JE, O'Connell MJ. Early detection of toxicity and adjustment of ongoing clinical trials: the history and performance of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group's real-time toxicity monitoring program. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 4591-4596.
  • 11
    Yeh ET, Bickford CL. Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management. Circulation. 2004; 109: 3122-3131.
  • 12
    Loerzel VW, Dow KH. Cardiac toxicity related to cancer treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2003; 7: 557-562.
  • 13
    Fumoleau P, Roché H, Kerbrat P, et al. Long-term cardiac toxicity after adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy in early breast cancer: French adjuvant study group results. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17: 85-92.
  • 14
    Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors: cardiac and pulmonary late effects. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3991-4008.
  • 15
    Jones LW, Haykowsky MJ, Swartz JJ, Douglas PS, Mackey JR. Early breast cancer therapy and cardiovascular injury. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 1435-1441.
  • 16
    Lewis JH, Kilgore ML, Goldman DP, et al. Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 1383-1389.
  • 17
    Ahmad SR. Adverse drug event monitoring at the Food and Drug Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18: 57-60.
  • 18
    Ioannidis JP, Lau J. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. JAMA. 2001; 285: 437-443.
  • 19
    Kessler DA. Introducing MEDWatch. A new approach to reporting medication and device adverse effects and product problems. JAMA. 1993; 269: 2765-2768.
  • 20
    Wu AW. Adverse drug events and near misses: who's counting? Am J Med. 2000; 109: 166-168.
  • 21
    Brewer T, Colditz GA. Postmarketing surveillance and adverse drug reactions: current perspectives and future needs. JAMA. 1999; 281: 824-829.
  • 22
    Temple R. Meta-analysis and epidemiologic studies in drug development and postmarketing surveillance. JAMA. 1999; 281: 841-844.
  • 23
    Lasser KE, Allen PD, Woolhandler SJ, Himmelstein DU, Wolfe SM, Bor DH. Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2215-2220.
  • 24
    Kaufman DW, Shapiro S. Epidemiological assessment of drug-induced disease. Lancet. 2000; 356: 1339-1343.
  • 25
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Research Activities. August 2004, No. 288. Postmarketing drug surveillance could be improved. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/aug04/0804RA11.htm#head3 Accessed May 11, 2006.
  • 26
    US Food and Drug Administration. Report to Congress: reports on postmarketing studies. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cber/fdama/pstmrktfdama130.htm Accessed May 11, 2006.
  • 27
    Fontanarosa PB, Rennie D, DeAngelis CD. Postmarketing surveillance—lack of vigilance, lack of trust. JAMA. 2004; 292: 2647-2650.
  • 28
    Griffin MR, Stein CM, Ray WA. Postmarketing surveillance for drug safety: surely we can do better. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2004; 75: 491-494.
  • 29
    Butler RN, Nyberg JP. Improving Drug Safety: The Importance of Postmarketing Drug Surveillance. Report Issue IB13-2004 of the International Longevity Center–USA. Available at: http://www.ilcusa.org/_lib/pdf/postmarketing.pdf Accessed May 12, 2006.
  • 30
    US Food and Drug Administration. FDA acts to strengthen the safety program for marketed drugs [press release]. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/NEW01131.html Accessed May 12, 2006.
  • 31
    Doyle JJ, Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, et al. Chemotherapy and cardiotoxicity in older breast cancer patients: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 8597-8605.
  • 32
    Pinder MC, Duan Z, Goodwin JS, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Congestive heart failure in older women treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3808-3815.
  • 33
    National Cancer Institute. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/index.html Accessed October 20, 2008.
  • 34
    U.S. Public Health Services. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Practice Management Information; 1996.
  • 35
    Du XL, Goodwin JS. Patterns of use of chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: Findings from Medicare claims data. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 1455-1461.
  • 36
    Du XL, Freeman JL, Goodwin JS. Information on radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer: the advantages of the linked Medicare and SEER data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52: 463-470.
  • 37
    Du XL, Chan W, Giordano S, et al. Variation in modes of chemotherapy administration for breast carcinoma and association with hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity. Cancer. 2005; 104: 913-924.
  • 38
    Penman AD, Johnson WD. A SAS program for calculating cumulative incidence of events (with confidence limits) and number at risk at specified time intervals with partially censored data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008; 89: 50-55.
  • 39
    Bryant J, Picot J, Levitt G, Sullivan I, Baxter L, Clegg A. Cardioprotection against the toxic effects of anthracyclines given to children with cancer: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11: iii, ix-x, 1-84.
  • 40
    Ganz PA, Hussey MA, Moinpour CM, et al. Late cardiac effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer survivors treated on Southwest Oncology Group protocol S8897. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1223-1230.
  • 41
    Ewer MS, Lenihan DJ. Left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiotoxicity: is our ear really to the ground? J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1201-1203.
  • 42
    Perez EA, Suman VJ, Davidson NE, et al. Cardiac safety analysis of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 adjuvant breast cancer trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1231-1238.
  • 43
    Steingart R. Mechanisms of late cardiovascular toxicity from cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 9051-9052.
  • 44
    Portera CC, Swain SM. The heart of the matter. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3794-3796.
  • 45
    Bird BR, Swain SM. Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer survivors: review of potential cardiac problems. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 14-24.