• 1
    Michaelson JS, Satija S, Kopans D, et al. Gauging the impact of breast carcinoma screening in terms of tumor size and death rate. Cancer. 2003; 98: 2114-2124.
  • 2
    Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ; American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54: 41-52.
  • 3
    US Preventative Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. 2006. Available at: Accessed March 30, 2006.
  • 4
    Vainio H, Bianchini F, eds; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 7: Breast Cancer Screening. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002.
  • 5
    Barton MB, Morley DS, Moore S, et al. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96: 529-538.
  • 6
    Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, Littlejohns P, Ramirez AJ. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1119-1126.
  • 7
    Barr JK, Franks AL, Lee NC, Herther P, Schachter M. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 661-667.
  • 8
    DuBard CA, Schmid D, Yow A, Rogers AB, Lawrence WW. Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among Medicaid recipients 50 years and older. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 2014-2021.
  • 9
    [No authors listed] StatBite: percentage screened for cancer by insurance status [serial online]. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 772.
  • 10
    Chang SW, Kerlikowske K, Napoles-Springer A, Posner SF, Sickles EA, Perez-Stable EJ. Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography. Cancer. 1996; 78: 1395-1402.
  • 11
    Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB. Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care. 2005; 43: 141-148.
  • 12
    Caplan LS, May DS, Richardson LC. Time to diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991-1995. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 130-134.
  • 13
    Jones BA, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2005; 16: 809-821.
  • 14
    Press R, Carrasquillo O, Sciacca RR, Giardina EG. Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. J Womens Health. 2008; 17: 923-930.
  • 15
    Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Tennant C, et al. Effects of health insurance and race on early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1409-1415.
  • 16
    Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Late stage cancers in a Medicaid-insured population. Med Care. 2003; 41: 722-728.
  • 17
    Halpern MT, Bian J, Ward EM, Schrag NM, Chen AY. Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis among women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2007; 110: 403-411.
  • 18
    Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329: 326-331.
  • 19
    Bradley CJ, Gardiner J, Given CW, Roberts C. Cancer, Medicaid enrollment, and survival disparities. Cancer. 2005; 103: 1712-1718.
  • 20
    Harlan LC, Greene AL, Clegg LX, Mooney M, Stevens JL, Brown ML. Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 9079-9088.
  • 21
    Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, et al. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54: 78-93.
  • 22
    Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. Access to Mammography Services in Florida Is More Limited for Low-Income Women. Tallahassee, Fla: Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability; 2004.
  • 23
    General Accounting Office. Mammography: Current Nationwide Capacity Is Adequate, but Access Problems May Exist in Certain Locations. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2006.
  • 24
    Gotbaum B, Tumarkin L, Han SA, Isenstadt M, Shekhter L. Missing the Mark: HHC Mammogram Wait Time Off Target. New York, NY: Public Advocate for the City of New York; 2006.
  • 25
    Meyeroff W. A look ahead: experts offer advice on making Medicare reimbursements work for medical imagers. Med Imag. 2005. Available at: Accessed on May 1, 2009.
  • 26
    Nass S, Ball J. Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council; 2005.
  • 27
    Institute of Medicine National Cancer Policy Board and Global Affairs Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy; Committee on New Approaches to Early Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Increased Access to High-Quality Mammography Needed to Reduce Cancer Deaths; Shortage of Screening Specialists Should Be Addressed to Deal With Capacity Crisis. Bethesda, Md: Institute of Medicine; 2004. Available at: http://www.nationalacademies. org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11016 Accessed November 1, 2008.
  • 28
    Skaggs DL, Clemens SM, Vitale MG, Femino JD, Kay RM. Access to orthopedic care for children with Medicaid versus private insurance in California [serial online]. Pediatrics. 2001; 107: 1405-1408.
  • 29
    Wang EC, Choe MC, Meara JG, Joempel JA. Inequality of access to surgical specialty health care: why children with government-funded insurance have less access than those with private insurance in Southern California [serial online]. Pediatrics. 2004; 114: e584-e590.
  • 30
    Resneck JJ, Pletcher MJ, Lozano N. Medicare, Medicaid, and access to dermatologists: the effect of patient insurance on appointment access and wait times. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50: 85-92.
  • 31
    Asplin BR, Rhodes KV, Levy H, et al. Insurance status and access to urgent ambulatory care follow-up appointments. JAMA. 2005; 294: 1248-1254.
  • 32
    Galbraith AA, Grossman DC, Koepsell TD, Heagerty PJ Christakis DA. Medicaid acceptance and availability of timely follow-up for newborns with Medicaid. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 1148-1154.
  • 33
    IsaacsSL, KnickmannJR, eds. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2006. Available at: Accessed October 1, 2005.
  • 34
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up. Available at: Accessed November 1, 2008.
  • 35
    Zuckerman S, McFeeters J, Cunningham P, Nichols L. Trends: changes in Medicaid physician fees, 1998-2003: implications for physician participation [serial online]. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004; W4(suppl web exclusives): 374-384.
  • 36
    D'Orsi C, Tu S-P, Nakano C, et al. Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist? Radiology. 2005; 235: 391-395.
  • 37
    US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Listing of Mammography Quality and Safety Act-Certified Mammography Facilities. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006.
  • 38
    Jones W, Elwyn G, Edwards P, Edwards A, Emmerson M, Hibbs R. Measuring access to primary care appointments: a review of methods [serial online]. BMC Fam Pract. 2003; 4: 8.
  • 39
    Fisher RJ. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consum Res. 1993; 20: 303-315.
  • 40
    [No authors listed] High-quality mammography: information for referring providers. Clin Pract Guide Quick Ref Guide Clin. 1994; 13: 1-18.
  • 41
    Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Third Next Available Appointment. IHI website. Available at: Available+Appointment.htm Accessed March 30, 2009.
  • 42
    Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage; 2002.
  • 43
    The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. State Health Facts. Available at: Accessed August 1, 2006.
  • 44
    Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. GLLAMM Manual. University of California Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Berkeley, Calif: University of California at Berkeley; 2004: 33-39.
  • 45
    Borgstede JP. The worthiest of causes. Am Coll Radiol Bull. 2006; 61: 1.
  • 46
    Farria DM, Schmidt ME, Monsees BS, et al. Professional and economic factors affecting access to mammography: a crisis today, or tomorrow? Cancer. 2005; 104: 491-498.
  • 47
    Office of US Senator Charles Schumer. Press Release, February 18, 2001. Schumer: lack of access to mammograms puts thousands of New York City and Long Island women at risk. Available at: releases/PR00494.html Accessed March 30, 2006.
  • 48
    Earp JA, Eng E, O'Malley MS, et al. Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92: 646-654.
  • 49
    Dietrich AJ, Tobin JN, Cassells A, et al. Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144: 563-571.
  • 50
    Roetzheim RG, Christman LK, Jacobsen PB, et al. A randomized controlled trial to increase cancer screening among attendees of community health centers. Ann Fam Med. 2004; 2: 294-300.
  • 51
    Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee P-J, Xie B. Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med. 2007; 44: 26-33.
  • 52
    Perloff JD, Kletke P, Fossett JW. Which physicians limit their Medicaid participation, and why. Health Serv Res. 1995; 30: 7-26.
  • 53
    Cunningham PJ, Nichols LM. The effects of Medicaid reimbursement on the access to care of Medicaid enrollees: a community perspective. Med Care Res Rev. 2005; 62: 676-696.
  • 54
    Santerre RE. The inequity of Medicaid reimbursement in the United States. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2002; 1: 25-32.
  • 55
    May DS, Lee NC, Nadel MR, Henson RM, Miller DS. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 97-104.
  • 56
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicaid website. Available at: Accessed August 1, 2006.
  • 57
    Freeman HP, Reuben SH. Voices of a broken system. Real problems, real people. In: President's Cancer Panel, Report of the Chairman, 2000-2001. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Program, National Cancer Institute; 2001.