SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Tavassoli FA, Deville P. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon, France: IARC; 2003.
  • 2
    Shih IeM, Kurman RJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol. 2004; 164: 1511-1518.
  • 3
    Gershenson D, Birrer M. Time for action: A “sea change” in treatment strategies for rare types of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 106: 1-3.
  • 4
    Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K, et al. Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a 2-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28: 496-504.
  • 5
    Shvartsman HS, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al. Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as low-grade serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105: 625-629.
  • 6
    Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Lu KH, et al. Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 361-368.
  • 7
    Gershenson DM, Sun CC, Bodurka DC, et al. Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114: 48-52.
  • 8
    Singer G, Oldt RIII, Cohen Y, et al. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 484-486.
  • 9
    Gilks CB. Subclassification of ovarian surface epithelial tumors based on correlation of histologic and molecular pathologic data. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004; 23: 200-205.
  • 10
    Bonome T, Lee JY, Park DC, et al. Expression profiling of serous low malignant potential, low-grade, and high-grade tumors of the ovary. Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 10602-10612.
  • 11
    Hess V, A'Hern R, Nasiri N, et al. Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: a separate entity requiring specific treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1040-1044.
  • 12
    Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Aravantinos G, et al. Advanced stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97: 436-441.
  • 13
    Winter WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3621-3627.
  • 14
    Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J, et al. Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. A distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer. 2000; 88: 2584-2589.
  • 15
    Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, et al. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 109: 370-376.
  • 16
    Kobel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med. 2008; 5: e232.
  • 17
    Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Aravantinos G, et al. Advanced stage clear-cell epithelial ovarian cancer: the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 102: 285-291.
  • 18
    Bamias A, Psaltopoulou T, Sotiropoulou M, et al. Mucinous but not clear cell histology is associated with inferior survival in patients with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010; 116: 1462-1468.
  • 19
    Timmers PJ, Zwinderman AH, Teodorovic I, et al. Clear cell carcinoma compared to serous carcinoma in early ovarian cancer: same prognosis in a large randomized trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009; 19: 88-93.
  • 20
    Ho CM, Huang YJ, Chen TC, et al. Pure-type clear cell carcinoma of the ovary as a distinct histological type and improved survival in patients treated with paclitaxel-platinum-based chemotherapy in pure-type advanced disease. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 94: 197-203.