Fax: (770) 488-4639
Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival†
To what extent are racial disparities explained by differences in treatment, tumor characteristics, or hospital characteristics?
Version of Record online: 12 JUL 2010
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society
Volume 116, Issue 19, pages 4622–4631, 1 October 2010
How to Cite
White, A., Vernon, S. W., Franzini, L. and Du, X. L. (2010), Racial disparities in colorectal cancer survival. Cancer, 116: 4622–4631. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25395
We express our gratitude to the National Cancer Institute; the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Information Management Services, Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor registries for creating the database. We also thank Chih-Chin Liu for extracting the dataset.
- Issue online: 12 JUL 2010
- Version of Record online: 12 JUL 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 MAR 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 1 MAR 2010
- Manuscript Received: 4 SEP 2009
- colorectal cancer;
Racial/ethnic differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) survival have been documented throughout the literature. However, the reasons for these disparities are difficult to decipher. The objective of this analysis was to determine the extent to which racial/ethnic disparities in survival are explained by differences in sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and hospital characteristics.
A cohort of 37,769 Medicare beneficiaries who were diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I, II, and III CRC from 1992 to 2002 and resided in 16 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) regions of the United States was identified in the SEER-Medicare linked database. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Black patients had worse CRC-specific survival than white patients, but the difference was reduced after adjustment (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.35). Asian patients had better survival than white patients after adjusting for covariates (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.92) for stages I, II, and III CRC. Relative to Asians, blacks and whites had worse survival after adjustment (blacks: aHR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.33-1.82; whites: aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.44). Comorbidities and socioeconomic Status were associated with a reduction in the mortality difference between blacks and whites and blacks and Asians.
Comorbidities and SES appeared to be more important factors contributing to poorer survival among black patients relative to white and Asian patients. However, racial/ethnic differences in CRC survival were not fully explained by differences in several factors. Future research should further examine the role of quality of care and the benefits of treatment and post-treatment surveillance in survival disparities. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.