• 1
    US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Approves Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants After In-Depth Evaluation. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006. Available at: Accessed May 11, 2009.
  • 2
    Rohrich RJ, Reece EM. Breast augmentation today: saline versus silicone–what are the facts? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 669-672.
  • 3
    Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 768-779.; discussion 780-781.
  • 4
    Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1590-1601.
  • 5
    European Medicines Agency. Reflection Paper on the Regulatory Guidance for the Use of the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. London, UK: European Medicines Agency; 2008. Available at: Accessed May 11, 2009.
  • 6
    US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Washington, DC: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006. Available at: Accessed May 11, 2009.
  • 7
    Revicki DA. FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet. 2007; 369: 540-542.
  • 8
    Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the Breast-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345-353.
  • 9
    Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys. The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2000.
  • 10
    Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Kind EA. Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002; 29: 547-553.
  • 11
    [no authors listed]. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205.
  • 12
    Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
  • 13
    Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992; 112: 155-159.
  • 14
    Aaron B, Kromrey JD, Ferron JM. Equating r-Based and d-Based Effect-Size Indices: Problems With a Commonly Recommended Formula. Presented at: Florida Educational Research Association; November 2-4, 1998; Orlando, Florida.
  • 15
    Schain WS, Wellisch DK, Pasnau RO, Landsverk J. The sooner the better: a study of psychological factors in woman undergoing immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction. Am J Psychiatry. 1985; 142: 40-46.
  • 16
    Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983; 1: 459-462.
  • 17
    Andrade WN, Baxter N, Semple JL. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 46-54.
  • 18
    Pusic A, Thompson TA, Kerrigan CL, et al. Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 1325-1333.
  • 19
    Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 769-776.
  • 20
    Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, Wilkins EG. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 7-12.
  • 21
    Cederna PS, Yates WR, Chang P, Cram AE, Ricciardelli EJ. Postmastectomy reconstruction: comparative analysis of the psychosocial, functional, and cosmetic effects of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap versus breast implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1995; 35: 458-468.
  • 22
    Edsander-Nord A, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1142-1153.
  • 23
    Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 757-767.
  • 24
    Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, Hughes DB. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 359-365.
  • 25
    Spear SL, Onyewu C. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 930-942.
  • 26
    Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49: 713-721.
  • 27
    Shaikh-Naidu N, Preminger BA, Rogers K, Messina P, Gayle LB. Determinants of aesthetic satisfaction following TRAM and implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 465-470; discussion 470.
  • 28
    Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL, Disa JJ, McCormick B, VanZee K. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 877-881.
  • 29
    Olsen MA, Lefta M, Dietz JR, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after major breast operation. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 326-335.
  • 30
    Jhaveri JD, Rush SC, Kostroff K, et al. Clinical outcomes of postmastectomy radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 859-865.
  • 31
    Gui GP, Kadayaprath G, Tan SM, et al. Long-term quality-of-life assessment following one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using biodimensional expander implants: the patient's perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 17-24.
  • 32
    Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Nos C, Falcou MC. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1702-1709.