SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Intuitive Surgical Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/faq/index.aspx Accessed: May 25, 2010.
  • 2
    Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE, Lobontiu A, Saint F, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol. 2001; 165: 1964-1966.
  • 3
    Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, Fromont G, Menon M, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol. 2001; 40: 70-74.
  • 4
    Rassweiler J, Frede T, Seemann O, Stock C, Sentker L. Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience. Eur Urol. 2001; 40: 75-83.
  • 5
    Kawachi MH. Counterpoint: robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: perhaps the surgical gold standard for prostate cancer care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007; 5: 689-692.
  • 6
    Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol. 2008; 22: 2299-2305.
  • 7
    Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int. 2009; 103: 448-453.
  • 8
    Casey JT, Meeks JJ, Greco KA, Wu SD, Nadler RB. Outcomes of locally advanced (T3 or greater) prostate cancer in men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2009; 23: 1519-1522.
  • 9
    Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J Urol. 2010; 183: 990-996.
  • 10
    Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B. Open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the European and US experience. Rev Urol. 2010; 12: 35-43.
  • 11
    Wexner SD, Bergamaschi R, Lacy A, Udo J, Brolmann H, Kennedy RH, et al. The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 438-443.
  • 12
    Stitzenberg KB, Meropol NJ. Trends in centralization of cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 2824-2831.
  • 13
    Barocas DA, Mitchell R, Chang SS, Cookson MS. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2010; 28: 243-250.
  • 14
    Mitchell RE, Lee BT, Cookson MS, Barocas DA, Herrell SD, Clark PE, et al. Immediate surgical outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the University Health System Consortium Clinical Data Base: the impact of hospital case volume, hospital size and geographical region on 48,000 patients. BJU Int. 2009; 104: 1442-1445.
  • 15
    Eastham JA. Do high-volume hospitals and surgeons provide better care in urologic oncology? Urol Oncol. 2009; 27: 417-421.
  • 16
    Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008; 180: 820-828; discussion 28-29.
  • 17
    Yao SL, Lu-Yao G. Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1950-1956.
  • 18
    Potosky AL, Warren JL. Radical prostatectomy: does higher volume lead to better quality? J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1906-1907.
  • 19
    Ellison LM, Heaney JA, Birkmeyer JD. The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2000; 163: 867-869.
  • 20
    Joudi FN, Konety BR. The volume/outcome relationship in urologic cancer surgery. Support Cancer Ther. 2004; 2: 42-46.
  • 21
    Nuttall M, van der Meulen J, Phillips N, Sharpin C, Gillatt D, McIntosh G, et al. A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures. J Urol. 2004; 172: 2145-2152.
  • 22
    Ellison LM, Trock BJ, Poe NR, Partin AW. The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005; 173: 2094-2098.
  • 23
    Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Miller DC, Daignault S, Taub DA, Wei JT. Volume-based referral for cancer surgery: informing the debate. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 91-96.
  • 24
    Siu W, Daignault S, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Gilbert S, Weizer AZ, et al. Understanding differences between high and low volume hospitals for radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2008; 26: 260-265.
  • 25
    Stitzenberg KB, Sigurdson ER, Egleston BL, Starkey RB, Meropol NJ. Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4671-4678.
  • 26
    Phibbs CS, Luft HS. Correlation of travel time on roads versus straight line distance. Med Care Res Rev. 1995; 52: 532-542.
  • 27
    McGuirk MA, Porell FW. Spatial patterns of hospital utilization: the impact of distance and time. Inquiry. 1984; 21: 84-95.
  • 28
    Fortney J, Rost K, Warren J. Comparing alternative methods of measuring geographic access to health services. Health Services Research and Outcomes Methodology. 2000; 1: 173-184.
  • 29
    Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, Kattan MW, Schrag D, Warren JL, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1138-1144.
  • 30
    Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979; 74: 829-836.
  • 31
    Shutts J, Ratcliffe SJ, Leonard M. Improved generalized estimating equation analysis via xtqls for quasi-least squares in STATA. Stata J. 2007; 7: 147-166.
  • 32
    Intuitive Surgical Hospital & Surgeon Locator. http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/patientresources/hospitals_doctors/ index.aspx Accessed July 6, 2010.
  • 33
    Box GN, Ahlering TE. Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18: 173-179.
  • 34
    Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Barry MJ, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 2009; 302: 1557-1564.
  • 35
    Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology. 2002; 60: 864-868.
  • 36
    Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Bhandari A, et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol Clin North Am. 2004; 31: 701-717.
  • 37
    Smith JA Jr. Robotically assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an assessment of its contemporary role in the surgical management of localized prostate cancer. Am J Surg. 2004; 188( 4A suppl): 63S-67S.
  • 38
    Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 1037-1063.
  • 39
    Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, Albala DM, Price MM, Polascik TJ, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008; 54: 785-793.
  • 40
    Weizer AZ, Ye Z, Hollingsworth JM, Dunn RL, Shah RB, Wolf JS Jr, et al. Adoption of new technology and healthcare quality: surgical margins after robotic prostatectomy. Urology. 2007; 70: 96-100.
  • 41
    Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology. 2005; 66( 5 suppl): 105-107.
  • 42
    Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Schrag D, Klein EA, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007; 99: 1171-1177.
  • 43
    Hollenbeck BK, Daignault S, Dunn RL, Gilbert S, Weizer AZ, Miller DC. Getting under the hood of the volume-outcome relationship for radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2007; 177: 2095-2099; discussion 99.
  • 44
    Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2010; 57: 453-458.
  • 45
    Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2005; 174: 2323-2329.
  • 46
    Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT. The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol. 2004; 172: 1431-1435.
  • 47
    Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology. 2008; 72: 1068-1072.
  • 48
    Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Hsu TS, Sullivan W, Su LM. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2003; 61: 612-616.
  • 49
    Williams AP, Schwartz WB, Newhouse JP, Bennett BW. How many miles to the doctor? N Engl J Med. 1983; 309: 958-963.
  • 50
    Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59: 225-249.
  • 51
    Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010; 8: 162-200.