SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Bland KI, Menck HR, Scott-Conner CEH, et al. The National Cancer Data Base 10-year survey of breast carcinoma treatment at hospitals in the United States. Cancer. 1998; 83: 1262-1273.
  • 2
    Morris J, Royle GT. Choice of surgery for early breast cancer: pre- and postoperative levels of clinical anxiety and depression in patients and their husbands. Br J Surg. 1987; 74: 1017-1019.
  • 3
    Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3437-3441.
  • 4
    McCarthy CM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer. 2010; 116: 5584-5591.
  • 5
    Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW. Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000; 26: 137-141.
  • 6
    Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000; 36: 1938-1943.
  • 7
    Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook EFJ, et al. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 761-771.
  • 8
    Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1-8.
  • 9
    Franchelli S, Leone MS, Berrino P, et al. Psychological evaluation of patients undergoing breast reconstruction using 2 different methods: autologous tissues versus prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 95: 1213-1218.
  • 10
    Tonseth KA, Hokland BM, Tindholdt TT, et al. Quality of life, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction using DIEP flap or expandable breast implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61: 1188-1194.
  • 11
    Damen THC, Timman R, Kunst EH, et al. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: 93-100.
  • 12
    Chun YS, Sinha I, Turko A, et al. Outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flaps in 105 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1-9.
  • 13
    Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1585-1595.
  • 14
    Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Ritz LJ, et al. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery. Cancer. 2001; 91: 1238-1246.
  • 15
    Parker P, Youssef A, Walker S, et al. Short-term and long-term psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women undergoing different surgical procedures for breast cancer. Ann Surg. Oncol. 2007; 14: 3078-3089.
  • 16
    Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: 2-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Ann Surg. 2008; 247: 1019-1028.
  • 17
    Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 1014-1025.
  • 18
    Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, et al. Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 2265-2274.
  • 19
    Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, et al. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204: 7-12.
  • 20
    Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, et al. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 1993; 218: 29-36.
  • 21
    Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, et al. Quality of life and affective distress in women seeking immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 116: 993-1002; discussion 1003-1005.
  • 22
    Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 1060-1068.
  • 23
    Anderson SG, Rodin J, Ariyan S. Treatment considerations in postmastectomy reconstruction: their relative importance and relationship to patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 33: 263-270; discussion 270-271.
  • 24
    Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345-353.
  • 25
    Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205.
  • 26
    US Department of Health and Human Services, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2006.
  • 27
    Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, Klok J, Cano SJ. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study [serial online]. BMC Womens Health. 2008; 9: 11.
  • 28
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67: 361-370.
  • 29
    Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979; 41: 209-218.
  • 30
    Thornton J, Sorokin ES. Optimal timing of breast reconstruction—an algorithm for management based on a review of the literature. Breast Dis. 2002; 16: 31-35.
  • 31
    Bostwick J 3rd, Carlson GW. Reconstruction of the breast. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 1997; 6: 71-89.
  • 32
    Kronowitz SJ, Kuerer HM. Advances and surgical decision-making for breast reconstruction. Cancer. 2006; 107: 893-907.
  • 33
    Disa JD, Zhong T, Pusic A. Muscle sparing and free TRAM flaps. In: Hall-Findlay E, Evans G, editors. Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Publishing Ltd.; 2010:93-115.
  • 34
    Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. The truly remarkable universality of half a standard deviation: confirmation through another look. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2004; 4: 581-585.
  • 35
    Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast. 2005; 14: 201-208.
  • 36
    Howard MA, Polo K, Pusic AL, et al. Breast cancer local recurrence after mastectomy and TRAM flap reconstruction: incidence and treatment options. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 1381-1386.
  • 37
    Murphy RX Jr, Wahhab S, Rovito PF, et al. Impact of immediate reconstruction on the local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003; 50: 333-338.
  • 38
    Vandeweyer E, Hertens D, Nogaret JM, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants: no interference with the oncologic outcome? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1409-1412.
  • 39
    Winters ZE, Benson JR, Pusic AL. A systematic review of the clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Ann Surg. 2010; 252: 929-942.
  • 40
    Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209: 123-133.
  • 41
    Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 832-839.
  • 42
    Andrades P, Fix RJ, Danilla S, et al. Ischemic complications in pedicle, free, and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 562-567.
  • 43
    Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 32-38.
  • 44
    Blondeel PN. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience. Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 104-111.
  • 45
    Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1438-1453.
  • 46
    Selber JC, Nelson J, Fosnot J, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: part I. Unilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1142-1153.
  • 47
    Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff EM, Webster MH. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103: 86-95.
  • 48
    Kind GM, Rademaker AW, Mustoe TA. Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: a functional outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 99: 417-428.
  • 49
    Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S, Kinnunen J, et al. Abdominal wall competence after free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap harvest: a prospective study. Ann Plast Surg. 1997; 39: 229-234.
  • 50
    Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000; 68: 697-709.
  • 51
    Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, et al. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1710-1716.
  • 52
    Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA. A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of 3 common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119: 1669-1676; discussion 1677-1678.
  • 53
    Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 823-837.