SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2010. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2010. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2010-rev. Accessed June 10, 2011.
  • 2
    Donaldson MS, ed; National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. Statement on Quality of Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1998. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9439.html. Accessed June 23, 2011.
  • 3
    Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editor. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9728. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 4
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001.
  • 5
    Hewitt M, Simone JV, editors. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1999.
  • 6
    Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003; 138: 721-725.
  • 7
    Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2117-2127.
  • 8
    Ho V, Heslin MJ, Yun H, et al. Trends in hospital and surgeon volume and operative mortality for cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13: 851-858.
  • 9
    Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2128-2137.
  • 10
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Annual Report, 2010. http://www.nccn.org/about/pdf/annual_report.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2010.
  • 11
    American Society of Clinical Oncology. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative: Program Overview. Available at: http://qopi.asco.org/program. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 12
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician Quality Reporting System formerly known as the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative: Overview. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/PQRS/. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 13
    Foster JA, Abdolrasulnia M, Doroodchi H, et al. Practice patterns and guideline adherence of medical oncologists in managing patients with early breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 697-706.
  • 14
    Romanus D, Weiser MR, Skibber JM, et al. Concordance with NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines and ASCO/NCCN Quality Measures: an NCCN institutional analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 895-904.
  • 15
    United States Congress. H.R. 3590: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, March 23, 2010. Washington, DC: 111th Congress; 2009-2010.
  • 16
    National Quality Forum (NQF). NQF-Endorsed Standards. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2011. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 17
    National Cancer Institute. Overview of the SEER Program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 18
    Kumar S, Shah JP, Bryant CS, et al. Second neoplasms in survivors of endometrial cancer: impact of radiation therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 113: 233-239.
  • 19
    Rosenthal DI, Liu L, Lee JH, et al. Importance of the treatment package time in surgery and postoperative radiation therapy for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2002; 24: 115-126.
  • 20
    Taylor C, Munro AJ, Glynne-Jones R, et al. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010; 340: c951.
  • 21
    Patlak M, Balogh E, Nass S; Institute of Medicine. Patient-Centered Cancer Treatment Planning: Improving the Quality of Oncology Care: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13155. Accessed August 1, 2011.
  • 22
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2010. Rockville, MD: 2011. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr10/nhdr10.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2011.
  • 23
    Mandelblatt JS, Yabroff KR, Kerner JF. Equitable access to cancer services: a review of barriers to quality care. Cancer. 1999; 86: 2378-2390.
  • 24
    Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Tosteson AN, Nease RF Jr. Patient preferences for location of care: implications for regionalization. Med Care. 1999; 37: 204-209.
  • 25
    National Conference of State Legislatures. Clinical Trials: What Are States Doing? Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14331. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 26
    Gross CP, Murthy V, Li Y, Kaluzny AD, Krumholz HM. Cancer trial enrollment after state-mandated reimbursement. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96: 1063-1069.
  • 27
    Gross CP, Wong N, Dubin JA, Mayne ST, Krumholz HM. Enrollment of older persons in cancer trials after the Medicare reimbursement policy change. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165: 1514-1520.
  • 28
    Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Kraemer HC, Gottheil E. Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet. 1989; 2: 888-891.
  • 29
    Stanton AL. Psychosocial concerns and interventions for cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 5132-5137.
  • 30
    Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, et al. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 733-742.
  • 31
    Osta BE, Palmer JL, Paraskevopoulos T, et al. Interval Between first palliative care consult and death in patients diagnosed with advanced cancer at a comprehensive cancer center. J Palliat Med. 2008; 11: 51-57.
  • 32
    Hui D, Elsayem A, De la Cruz M, et al. Availability and integration of palliative care at US cancer centers. JAMA. 2010; 303: 1054-1061.
  • 33
    Bruera E, Hui D. Integrating supportive and palliative care in the trajectory of cancer: establishing goals and models of care. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 4013-4017.
  • 34
    Spettell CM, Rawlins WS, Krakauer R, et al. A comprehensive case management program to improve palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2009; 12: 827-832.
  • 35
    Bakitas M, Lyons KD, Hegel MT, et al. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: the Project ENABLE II randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009; 302: 741-749.
  • 36
    Leader A, Daskalakis C, Braddock CH 3rd, et al. Measuring informed decision making about prostate cancer screening in primary care [published online ahead of print June 17, 2011]. Med Decis Making. 2011.
  • 37
    White VM, Macvean ML, Grogan S, et al. Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial [published online ahead of print July 18, 2011]. Psychooncology. 2011.
  • 38
    Poustchi H, Farrell G, Strasser S, Lee A, McCaughan G, George J. Feasibility of conducting a randomised control trial for liver cancer screening: is a randomized controlled trial for liver cancer screening feasible or still needed [published online ahead of print July 20, 2011.]? Hepatology. 2011.
  • 39
    Applebaum AJ, Lichtenthal WG, Pessin HA, et al. Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer [published online ahead of print July 12, 2011]. Psychooncology. 2011.
  • 40
    Merkow RP, Ko CY. Evidence-based medicine in surgery: the importance of both experimental and observational study designs. JAMA. 2011; 306: 436-437.
  • 41
    Simon J. The State of Health Information Technology in California. Available at: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2011/05/health-information-technology-california. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 42
    PwC Health Research Institute. Putting patients into “meaningful use.” Available at: http://www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/publications/putting-patients-into-meaningful-use.jhtml. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 43
    Varian Medical Systems. Varian's ARIA for Medical Oncology Receives ONC-ATCB EMR Certification by Drummond Group [press release, May 4, 2011]. Palo Alto, CA: Varian Medical Systems; 2011. Available at: http://varian. mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=855. Accessed August 3, 2011.
  • 44
    Elekta AB. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Available in Elekta's MOSAIQ EMR [press release, June 8, 2011]. Atlanta, GA: Elekta AB; 2011. Available at: http://www.elekta.com/healthcare_international_press_release_20071275.php. Accessed August 3, 2011.
  • 45
    Department of Health and Human Services. Text of the Recovery Act Related to Comparative Effectiveness Funding, American Recovery Reinvestment Act of 2009. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/recoveryacttext.html. Accessed May 5, 2011.
  • 46
    US Government Accountability Office. HHS Research Awards: Use of Recovery Act and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Funds for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Publication No. GAO-11-712R. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office; 2011. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-712R. Accessed June 27, 2011.
  • 47
    Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization, Institute of Medicine. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12648#toc. Accessed July 1, 2011.
  • 48
    Inglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research—Institute of Medicine recommendations. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 325-328.
  • 49
    National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Comparative effectiveness research (CER). CER supported by NCI: projects supported by ARRA funding. Available at: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/cer/cer_supported_nci.html. Accessed May 5, 2011.
  • 50
    Department of Health and Human Resources, Office of the Secretary. Proposed Project: Comparative Effectiveness Research Inventory (Public Comment). Fed Reg. 2011; 76: 1616-1617. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-01-11/html/2011-310.htm. Accessed May 5, 2011.
  • 51
    Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103: 117-128.
  • 52
    Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N, et al. Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58: 9-31.
  • 53
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2009. Rockville, MD: 2010. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr09/nhdr09.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2011.
  • 54
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2008. Rockville, MD: 2009. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr08/nhdr08.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2011.
  • 55
    National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD) Research. CRCHD Research. Available at: http://crchd.cancer.gov/research/prchd-overview.html. Accessed June 6, 2011.
  • 56
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). About the AHRQ Health Care Innovations Exchange. Available at: http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/about.aspx. Accessed August 3, 2011.
  • 57
    Presidents Cancer Panel. President's Cancer Panel: 2009-2010 Annual Report. March 2011. Available at: http:// deainfo.nci.nih.gov/ADVISORY/pcp/pcp.htm. Accessed July 1, 2011.