SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • yoga;
  • fatigue;
  • breast cancer;
  • randomized controlled trial;
  • survivor

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

BACKGROUND:

Cancer-related fatigue afflicts up to 33% of breast cancer survivors, yet there are no empirically validated treatments for this symptom.

METHODS:

The authors conducted a 2-group randomized controlled trial to determine the feasibility and efficacy of an Iyengar yoga intervention for breast cancer survivors with persistent post-treatment fatigue. Participants were breast cancer survivors who had completed cancer treatments (other than endocrine therapy) at least 6 months before enrollment, reported significant cancer-related fatigue, and had no other medical conditions that would account for fatigue symptoms or interfere with yoga practice. Block randomization was used to assign participants to a 12-week, Iyengar-based yoga intervention or to 12 weeks of health education (control). The primary outcome was change in fatigue measured at baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 3 months after treatment completion. Additional outcomes included changes in vigor, depressive symptoms, sleep, perceived stress, and physical performance. Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted with all randomized participants using linear mixed models.

RESULTS:

Thirty-one women were randomly assigned to yoga (n = 16) or health education (n = 15). Fatigue severity declined significantly from baseline to post-treatment and over a 3-month follow-up in the yoga group relative to controls (P = .032). In addition, the yoga group had significant increases in vigor relative to controls (P = .011). Both groups had positive changes in depressive symptoms and perceived stress (P < .05). No significant changes in sleep or physical performance were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

A targeted yoga intervention led to significant improvements in fatigue and vigor among breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue symptoms. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

Approximately 33% of cancer survivors experience persistent fatigue of unknown origin, causing significant impairment in quality of life.1, 2 Despite the prevalence and impact of this symptom, currently, there are no empirically validated treatments for persistent cancer-related fatigue. To date, only 2 published behavioral intervention trials have specifically targeted cancer survivors with persistent fatigue.3, 4 Other psychological (eg, stress reduction) and activity-based (eg, exercise) interventions have reduced fatigue in cancer populations5-7; however, because these trials have not targeted fatigued patients, the feasibility and efficacy of these approaches for treating postcancer fatigue is unclear. Indeed, fatigue is a significant barrier to participation in exercise programs for cancer survivors.8

Mind-body interventions like yoga are promising approaches for treating cancer-related fatigue. Yoga involves physical postures (asanas) that develop strength and flexibility and promote relaxation. Yoga is also a meditative practice, because the practitioner focuses on the body and breath in each pose.9 A growing body of research indicates that yoga has beneficial effects on physical and behavioral outcomes in cancer patients and survivors,10-12 including improvements in quality of life, mood, and fatigue.13-18 However, as with the behavioral interventions, none of the published yoga trials have targeted patients with fatigue. Moreover, very few of these trials have included an active control group to control for attention, group support, and other nonspecific components of the treatment.

The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of an Iyengar yoga intervention for breast cancer survivors with persistent post-treatment fatigue relative to health education control. On the basis of promising results from a small, uncontrolled trial conducted by our group,19 we hypothesized that this intervention would lead to significant improvements in fatigue and vigor. Effects on secondary outcomes, including depressive symptoms, sleep disturbance, stress, and physical performance, also were assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

Design

The study was a single-center, 2-armed RCT. The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Review Board approved the study procedures, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Participants

Breast cancer survivors with persistent post-treatment fatigue were recruited through multiple mechanisms, including tumor registry mailings, newspaper advertisements, and flyers distributed at cancer-related and community locations. Inclusion criteria were: 1) originally diagnosed with stage 0 to II breast cancer, 2) completed local and/or adjuvant cancer therapy (with the exception of hormone therapy) at least 6 months previously, 3) ages 40 to 65 years, 4) postmenopausal, 5) no other cancer in last 5 years, and 6) experiencing persistent cancer-related fatigue. We focused on women with early stage breast cancer to reduce heterogeneity in disease-related and treatment-related factors impacting fatigue and its biologic and psychological correlates. We focused on women at least 6 months post-treatment completion to ensure that participants had persistent post-treatment fatigue and to reduce confounding residual effects of cancer treatment on biologic parameters. The presence of cancer-related fatigue was indicated by scores ≤50 on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) vitality scale, a reliable and valid measure of energy/fatigue in the past month,20 and self-report that fatigue was a consequence of cancer or cancer therapy. In our previous research, breast cancer survivors who scored ≤50 on the SF-36 vitality scale had behavioral, immune, and neuroendocrine alterations relative to women who scored >50, supporting this classification.1, 21-26 Exclusion criteria were: 1) chronic medical conditions or regular use of medications associated with fatigue (eg, untreated hypothyroidism, diabetes, autoimmune disease, anemia [defined as a hematocrit <24], chronic fatigue syndrome), 2) evidence that fatigue was driven primarily by a medical or psychiatric disorder other than cancer (eg, current major depression, insomnia, sleep apnea), 3) evidence that fatigue was driven primarily by other noncancer-related factors (eg, shift work, recent change in activity or schedule), 4) physical problems or conditions that could make yoga unsafe (eg, serious neck injuries, unstable joints), and 5) a body mass index (BMI) >31 kg/m2. Potential participants were first screened by telephone and then, if they met preliminary eligibility criteria, completed an in-person screening visit at which they completed questionnaires and interviews about their medical history and were asked to perform simple movements (eg, standing with feet touching for 30 seconds, lifting arms over head, moving from standing position to seated position on floor) to verify safety for yoga practice.

Randomization and Blinding

Given class scheduling considerations, participants were randomized in blocks. Once a sufficient number of participants to comprise the yoga and health education groups had been screened as eligible (8-14 women), participants were randomized (1:1) to the 2 treatments after completing baseline assessments. The allocation sequence was generated independently by the study statistician (R.O.) and was concealed in opaque envelopes. Our recruitment documents, screening materials, and informed consent indicated that the purpose of this study was to compare 2 different treatments for postcancer fatigue: yoga classes and a wellness seminar series. Thus, although participants were aware of the condition to which they were assigned, they did not know the study hypotheses. Outcomes assessors for the performance tasks were blinded to group assignment, and all were trained in standardized testing procedures.

Interventions

Iyengar yoga classes were conducted for 90 minutes twice a week for 12 weeks in groups of 4 to 6 women. Classes were taught by a certified Junior Intermediate Iyengar yoga instructor and an assistant under the guidance of a senior teacher. Iyengar yoga, a traditional form of Hatha yoga, prescribes specific therapeutic yoga practices for individuals with specific medical problems and conditions.27 This trial emphasized postures and breathing techniques believed to be effective for reducing fatigue among women with a history of breast cancer, with a focus on passive inversions (ie, supported upside-down postures in which the head is lower than the heart) and passive backbends (ie, supported spinal extensions). In supportive postures, the shape of the pose is supported by props (eg, blocks, bolsters, blankets, wall ropes, belts) rather than being held by the strength of the body, so that participants can perform and maintain the postures without stress and tension. The postures were introduced using a standard progression from simpler to more challenging over the course of the intervention and were adapted to suit individual needs. A complete list of study postures and the props used to support each is provided in Table 1. Not all of these postures were included in each class. A typical sequence of postures included in a midintervention class and the duration of each posture is as follows: 1) Supta Baddhakonasana (10 minutes), 2) Setubandha Sarvangasana on bolsters (5 minutes), 3) Adhomukha Svanasana (5 minutes), 4) Salamba Sirsasana (5 minutes), 5) Viparita Dandasana (5 minutes), 6) Setubandha Sarvangasana on a wooden bench (5 minutes), 7) Viparita Karani (10 minutes), and 8) Supported Savasana (10 minutes).

Table 1. List of Yoga Postures for Persistent Cancer-Related Fatigue
Study Posturesa
  • a

    A full description of each pose, including pictures, and a detailed intervention manual including class sequences is available from the first author.

Supta Baddhakonasana with bolster, strap, and blankets
Supta Svatstikasana with bolster and blanket
Setubandha Sarvangasana with bolster, strap, and blankets
Setubandha Sarvangasana on a wooden bench with a box and bolster
Purvottanasana with 2 chairs, bolsters, and blankets
Viparita Dandasana on 2 chairs with the head supported
Salamba Sarvangasana with a chair, bolster, sticky mat, and blanket
Salamba Sirsasana on ropes
Supta Konasana with legs apart on 2 chairs
Viparita Karani with 2 blocks, a wall, a bolster, and blankets
Bharadvajasana on chair
Adhomukha Svanasana on ropes with chair
Urdhva Mukha Svanasana with chair
Urdhva Hastasana
Urdhva Baddhanguliyasana
Ropes 1
Savasana with bolster and blanket

Health education classes were conducted for 120 minutes once a week for 12 weeks in groups of 4 to 7 women. Classes were led by a PhD-level psychologist with clinical experience in the treatment of breast cancer survivors. The classes were didactic in nature and consisted of lectures about topics of interest to breast cancer survivors followed by questions and discussion. The topics included 1) cancer-related fatigue; 2) introduction to cancer survivorship; 3) psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship; 4) weight and chronic disease management; 5) cancer genetic predisposition testing and counseling for breast/ovarian cancer syndromes; 6) stress and cancer; 7) diet, nutrition, and cancer survivorship; 8) sleep hygiene; 9) cognitive problems after cancer treatment; 10) osteoporosis and cancer survivorship; 11) body image and sexuality; and 12) finding meaning and achieving goals. Our previous experience with this patient population suggested that women would be unlikely to travel to the study site twice a week for health education classes. Thus, we elected to have the health education group meet only once per week (vs twice per week for yoga) for a longer duration (120 minutes per session vs 90 minutes per session for yoga). Consequently, the total number of class hours for yoga (36 hours) was greater than that for health education (24 hours). Neither group was instructed to do home practice or reading.

Outcome Measures

Questionnaires and functional assessments were obtained at baseline, within 2 weeks postintervention, and 3 months after the intervention was completed. The primary outcome of interest was subjective fatigue severity, which was assessed with the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), a reliable and valid measure of fatigue that was designed for use with cancer patients.28, 29 A related outcome, vigor, was assessed using the vigor subscale of the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory.30 Several secondary outcomes also were assessed. To determine whether intervention effects might extend to behavioral symptoms correlated with fatigue,1, 31 we assessed depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory-II,32 and we assessed subjective sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.33 In addition, to examine more generalized intervention effects on feelings of stress, we administered the Perceived Stress Scale.34 Physical performance tasks were administered to provide an objective measure of functional status. Timed chair stands were used to assess lower extremity strength and endurance,35 and the functional reach test was used to assess strength, flexibility, and balance.36

Self-reported demographic and disease-related variables were assessed at baseline, and expectations and beliefs about treatment efficacy were assessed at baseline and postintervention. Self-efficacy for managing fatigue, a potentially important component of intervention effects,37 was assessed with the fatigue subscale of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Self-Efficacy Questionnaire38 adapted for breast cancer. Fatigue interference with activities, mood, and enjoyment of life was assessed with the interference subscale of the FSI.28, 29 Finally, blood and saliva samples were collected for assessment of biologic functioning; the results from these assays still are pending and will be reported separately.

Statistical Analyses

On the basis of the large effect on subjective fatigue severity observed in our single-arm pilot study of this yoga intervention (d = 2.2 at postintervention, d = 1.2 at 3-month follow-up),19 a sample of 30 participants would provide ≥90% power to detect a between-group difference on the FSI. To account for the possibility of a smaller intervention effect than that observed in our single-arm pilot, our original enrollment target was 72 participants and assumed 20% loss to follow-up. Because of our stringent eligibility criteria, enrollment was lower than planned (n = 31) but was still adequate to detect a large intervention effect. All statistical analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Outcome measures were tested first for baseline equivalence using t tests or chi-square tests, as appropriate. Primary analyses used mixed-model analyses of variance to account for any incomplete data (ie, loss to follow-up). Treatments (yoga or health education) by time (baseline, post-treatment, 3-month post-treatment follow-up) were the independent factors, and time factor covariances were estimated individually (ie, unstructured). Separate analyses were conducted for each of the outcome measures. We did not adjust for multiple testing. Exact P values are presented.

RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

The study took place at the UCLA Medical Center, Westwood, California between March 2007 and July 2010. We screened 255 women for eligibility; 188 (75%) were not eligible, and 36 (14%) were not interested in participating. The primary reasons for ineligibility were cancer-related, including diagnosis with stage III or IV breast cancer (n = 23), no previous breast cancer diagnosis (n = 19), <6 months post-treatment completion (n = 11), and other cancer in the last 5 years (n = 3). Medical exclusions were BMI >31 kg/m2 (n = 23), medical conditions that could interfere with safe yoga practice (n = 17), chronic medical conditions or medications that could impact fatigue (n = 11), and age-related and menopause-related reasons (n = 39). Fatigue-related exclusions were not fatigued (n = 30) and fatigue not related to cancer (n = 11). We randomized 31 women to either a 12-week Iyengar yoga intervention (n = 16) or a 12-week health education program (n = 15). Twenty-eight women received the allocated intervention, which we defined as attending more than 1 class, and follow-up data were obtained on 29 participants (94%). A Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram is provided in Figure 1.

thumbnail image

Figure 1. This is a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram of the current study. FU indicates follow-up; post-tx, post-treatment.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Groups were balanced on demographic and disease-related characteristics at baseline, and both reported high levels of fatigue (Table 2). In the yoga group, the mean number of classes attended was 18.9 of 24 classes (78%), and the median was 22 of 24 classes (92%). In the education group, the mean number of classes attended was 9.2 of 12 classes (77%), and the median was 11 of 12 classes (92%). At the-3 month follow-up, 9 of 14 women who attended the yoga classes (64%) were continuing to use the techniques learned in class.

Table 2. Demographic and Treatment-Related Characteristics of Study Participants: Mean +/− SD for Continuous Variables and Numbers (%) for Categorical Variablesa
  
CharacteristicYoga Group, n = 16Health Education Group, n = 15
  • Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SF-36, the Medical Outcome Study 36-item short-form health survey; SD, standard deviation.

  • a

    No differences were significant at P < .20.

Age, y54.4±5.753.3±4.9
BMI, kg/m224.0±2.525.3±3.4
SF-36 vitality score37.8±16.034.0±16.3
Married/in committed relationship12 (75)11 (73)
Race/ethnicity  
 White15 (94)12 (80)
 Hispanic0 (0)2 (13)
 Black1 (6)0 (0)
 Other0 (0)1 (7)
Education status  
 High school graduate/AA degree6 (37.5)7 (46)
 College graduate6 (37.5)4 (27)
 Graduate degree4 (25)4 (27)
Annual family income  
 <$45,0003 (19)1 (7)
 $45,000-$75,0005 (31)4 (27)
 $75,000-$100,0004 (25)3 (20)
 >$100,0003 (19)7 (46)
 Not reported1 (6)0 (0)
Treatment received  
 Radiation11 (69)13 (87)
 Chemotherapy8 (50)9 (60)
 Tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitor12 (75)10 (67)
Time since treatment completion  
 Median [range], y1.7 [0.7- 4.1]1.7 [0.7-18.3]

Intervention Effects on Fatigue and Vigor

Yoga led to statistically significant improvements in fatigue severity (P for group-by-time interaction = .032; effect size for predicted change from baseline to 3-month follow-up in the yoga vs health education group, d = 1.5). Participants in the yoga group reported steady declines in fatigue severity from baseline to post-treatment and over the 3-month follow-up, whereas women assigned to health education reported no change over this period (Fig. 2). Similar effects were observed for vigor: The yoga group had a statistically significant increase in vigor over the assessment period compared with controls (P for group-by-time interaction = .011; effect size for predicted change from baseline to 3-month follow-up in yoga vs health education, d = 1.20). We also explored intervention effects on fatigue interference and observed a significant effect of time (P < .0001) and a marginally significant group-by-time interaction (P = .08). Both groups reported decreases in fatigue interference over time with a marginally larger decrease in the yoga group (mean change from baseline to 3-month follow-up = 15.8) than in the health education group (mean change from baseline to 3-month follow-up = 7.9). Yoga group participants also were significantly more confident about their ability to manage fatigue and its impact on their lives than control group participants post-treatment (yoga group mean, 7.9; education group mean, 6.1; t(28) = −2.6; P = .017).

thumbnail image

Figure 2. Changes in (Top) fatigue severity and (Bottom) vigor are illustrated in the yoga and health education groups. The yoga group had significant declines in fatigue severity and significant improvements in vigor from baseline to post-treatment (post-tx) and over the 3-month post-treatment follow-up relative to health education controls.

Download figure to PowerPoint

To determine the clinical significance of these effects, we calculated the change in SF-36 vitality scale scores from baseline to 3-month follow-up in each group. Although this was not a primary outcome for the trial, there are published norms for the determination of clinically significant changes on this measure.39 For women randomized to yoga, there was a mean increase in SF-36 vitality scores of 23.9 points, which exceeds the reliable change index of 22.7 for this scale and indicates a clinically significant improvement in fatigue. For women randomized to health education, the mean increase in SF-36 vitality scores was 7.7 points.

Intervention Effects on Depressive Symptoms, Stress, Sleep, and Physical Performance

For depressive symptoms, there was a significant effect of time (P < .0001) and a significant group-by-time interaction (P = .026). Both groups reported reductions in depressive symptoms from baseline to post-treatment, although there was a greater decline in symptoms among women in the yoga group at this time point. By the 3-month follow-up, the yoga group had rebounded, and the groups reported similar symptom levels. There also was a significant time effect for perceived stress (P = .015); feelings of stress decreased over the assessment period in both groups. There were no significant effects for subjective sleep quality. For the physical performance tasks, there was a significant time effect for chair stands (P < .0001) as both groups improved over time, but no group-by-time interaction was observed for either task (P > .60). Table 3 presents mean scores for the primary and secondary outcomes at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up as well as group differences in change scores.

Table 3. Group Means and Group Differences in Mean Change Scores for All Outcomes
 Mean±SDMean [95% CI]
OutcomeBaselinePost- Treatment3-Month Follow-UpGroup Difference in Change From Baseline to Post-TreatmentGroup Difference in Change From Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up
  • Abbreviations: BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory, second edition; CI, confidence interval; FSI, Fatigue Symptom Inventory; FU, follow-up; MFSI, Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory; PSQI, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SD, standard deviation.

  • a

    P < .05.

Primary outcomes     
 FSI fatigue severity (0-11; higher is worse)     
  Iyengar yoga4.8±1.13.4±1.82.8±2.3−1.24 [−0.04 to −2.45]a−1.62 [−0.37 to −2.88]a
  Health education5.1±0.954.9±1.34.7±1.5  
 MFSI vigor (0-24; higher is better)     
  Iyengar yoga8.8±3.212.5±3.811.9±4.74.80 [1.86 to 7.74]a4.25 [0.99 to 7.50]a
  Health education9.1±3.68.4±3.48.6±4.2  
Secondary outcomes     
 BDI-II depressive symptoms (0-63; higher is worse)     
  Iyengar yoga15.5±7.57.7±5.89.9±8.0−5.80 [−1.74 to −9.86]a−3.06 [0.37 to −6.49]
  Health education14.3±7.511.6±7.110.5±7.9  
 PSQI sleep disturbance (0-21; higher is worse)     
  Iyengar yoga9.2±3.38.1±2.57.6±2.70.20 [2.78 to −2.38]−2.14 [1.06 to −5.39]
  Health education9.1±3.57.7±2.69.1±3.3  
 Perceived stress scale (0-40; higher is worse)     
  Iyengar yoga26.6±7.323.5±7.323.6±6.7−1.77 [1.71 to −5.26]−1.51 [2.38 to −5.39]
  Health education26.8±5.925.4±5.924.2±4.7  
 Chair stand time, s (higher is worse)     
  Iyengar yoga13.4±2.312.3±2.011.1±1.91.31 [−5.00 to 2.38]−0.74 [−3.74 to 2.26]
  Health education13.5±2.612.6±3.212.2±2.8  
 Functional reach, cm (higher is better)     
  Iyengar yoga31.1±5.729.6±6.229.5±5.1−2.00 [5.76 to −9.73]−2.21 [5.56 to −9.98]
  Health education29.5±6.728.5±7.228.8±8.0  

Expectations and Beliefs About Treatment

We assessed expectations and beliefs about treatment efficacy to determine whether these may account for beneficial effects of yoga. After random assignment, participants in both groups believed that the intervention to which they had been assigned would be effective in improving their fatigue symptoms: On a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all effective) to 6 (very effective), the mean score was 3.86 for the yoga group and 3.2 for the health education group (P = .33). At the post-treatment assessment, participants in both groups reported that they had experienced “quite a bit” of benefit from attending the classes: On a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no benefit) to 6 (very much benefit), the mean score was 4.43 for the yoga group and 4.87 for the health education group (P = .53). Moreover, both groups reported positive changes in fatigue postintervention: On a 13-point Likert scale ranging from −6 (very much worse) to 6 (very much better), the mean score was 1.93 for the yoga group and 1.87 for the education group (P = .94). These findings suggest that the 2 groups had similar expectations and beliefs about treatment efficacy.

Safety

There was 1 adverse event related to the protocol: A participant who had a history of back problems experienced a back spasm in yoga class. After evaluation by her physician, she was able to return to class and complete the intervention.

DISCUSSION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

Results from this RCT indicate that a yoga intervention targeted at improving fatigue may be a feasible and effective treatment for breast cancer survivors who have persistent cancer-related fatigue. Participants in the yoga group experienced significant reductions in fatigue and increases in vigor from baseline to post-treatment that persisted over a 3-month follow-up, consistent with results from our single-arm pilot study,19 whereas no changes in these outcomes were observed in the control group participants. Measures of effect size indicated that this was a large effect (d = 1.5 for fatigue severity) and was considerably larger than the small-to-moderate effect sizes observed in previous behavioral interventions for cancer-related fatigue.5, 7 This change also appeared to be clinically significant. By the 3-month post-treatment follow-up, scores on the FSI fell below the cutoff for clinically meaningful fatigue among women in the yoga group,40 and this group also had a clinically significant improvement in scores on the SF-36 vitality scale.39

Despite high levels of fatigue at study onset, adherence to the yoga intervention was excellent, with over 80% of participants attending at least 20 of the 24 yoga classes offered. This is noteworthy, because fatigue is typically a barrier to participation in behavioral interventions for cancer patients, including yoga programs not specifically designed to treat fatigue.18 We suspect that the careful selection of yoga poses for fatigued individuals and the use of props that enabled these poses to be performed without effort or strain played an important role in maintaining trial adherence.

Participants in the yoga and health education interventions reported comparable declines in depressive symptoms and perceived stress by the 3-month follow-up. For the education group, these improvements may have resulted from the provision of information about breast cancer survivorship as well as nonspecific aspects of the intervention, including attention and group support. Very few behavioral or mind-body intervention trials for cancer-related fatigue have included active control groups, relying instead on usual care or wait-list controls.5-7 Consistent with our findings, Irwin et al observed beneficial effects of health education on depressive symptoms in a study comparing Tai Chi with health education for insomnia.41 These results strongly support the inclusion of active control groups in mind-body and other behavioral intervention trials.

Our study had several limitations. First, we enrolled a relatively small number of participants, reflecting the challenges of recruiting fatigued breast cancer survivors with no comorbid fatigue-related medical conditions or physical limitations who were willing to participate in a demanding intervention study. It will be important to replicate these findings in a larger trial and to determine whether effects are generalizable to a broader group of breast cancer survivors. We also restricted our sample to women who had been diagnosed with early stage disease, had completed cancer treatment, and had a BMI <31 kg/m2. Thus, effects may not be generalizable to breast cancer survivors with more advanced disease, those who are undergoing treatment, and/or those who are obese; and the yoga intervention may require adaptation to meet the specific needs of these groups. In addition, although the majority of study participants (94%) were within 5 years postdiagnosis, we did enroll a few women who had been living with cancer-related fatigue for greater than 10 years. Future studies should examine whether the length of time since cancer treatment influences intervention efficacy and possibly target either shorter term or longer term survivors. Next, it is not feasible to use a double-blind study design with this type of intervention; participants unavoidably are aware of the treatment that they receive. We attempted to minimize the impact of pre-existing beliefs and expectations on study outcomes by informing participants that we were testing 2 different treatments for cancer-related fatigue, each of which presumably was effective. This presentation appeared to have been successful, because both groups had similar, positive expectations about the efficacy of the treatment to which they had been assigned. Finally, the yoga and health education conditions were not matched for class frequency or duration, and it is possible that the benefits observed in the yoga group may be attributable in part to the higher number of intervention hours received. Future studies should match class frequency and duration across conditions. It also will be useful to compare yoga with a more physically oriented control condition (eg, stretching) or with relaxation to probe the active components of this intervention.

These preliminary findings indicate that a specialized yoga intervention may have beneficial effects on cancer-related fatigue, even among survivors who have experienced fatigue for years after treatment. Future investigation into this promising approach is warranted, including an examination of the mechanisms and duration of treatment effects. Yoga may have effects on the immune and neuroendocrine systems,42-46 which have been linked to post-treatment fatigue in previous research21, 23, 24, 26, 47-49 and are currently under investigation in this sample.

FUNDING SOURCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES

This work was supported by a grant from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine/National Institutes of Health (NCCAM/NIH U01-AT003682; Iyengar Yoga for Breast Cancer Survivors with Persistent Fatigue).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

The authors made no disclosures.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
  5. RESULTS
  6. DISCUSSION
  7. FUNDING SOURCES
  8. REFERENCES
  • 1
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18: 743-753.
  • 2
    Cella D, Davis K, Breitbart W, Curt G. Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3385-3391.
  • 3
    Gielissen MF, Verhagen S, Witjes F, Bleijenberg G. Effects of cognitive behavior therapy in severely fatigued disease-free cancer patients compared with patients waiting for cognitive behavior therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 4882-4887.
  • 4
    Jain S, Pavlik D, Distefan J, Bruyere RR, Acer J, Garcia R, et al. Complementary medicine for fatigue and cortisol variability in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial [published online ahead of print August 5, 2011]. Cancer. 2011.
  • 5
    Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Vadaparampil ST, Small BJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological and activity-based interventions for cancer-related fatigue. Health Psychol. 2007; 26: 660-667.
  • 6
    Schmitz KH, Holtzman J, Courneya KS, Masse LC, Duval S, Kane R. Controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 1588-1595.
  • 7
    Kangas M, Bovbjerg DH, Montgomery GH. Cancer-related fatigue: a systematic and meta-analytic review of non-pharmacological therapies for cancer patients. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134: 700-741.
  • 8
    Courneya KS, Friedenreich CM, Quinney HA, et al. A longitudinal study of exercise barriers in colorectal cancer survivors participating in a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29: 147-153.
  • 9
    Iyengar BKS. Light on Yoga. New York: Schocken; 1995.
  • 10
    Lin KY, Hu YT, Chang KJ, Lin HF, Tsauo JY. Effects of yoga on psychological health, quality of life, and physical health of patients with cancer: a meta-analysis [serial online]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 659876, 2011.
  • 11
    Bower JE, Woolery A, Sternlieb B, Garet D. Yoga for cancer patients and survivors. Cancer Control. 2005; 12: 165-171.
  • 12
    Smith KB, Pukall CF. An evidence-based review of yoga as a complementary intervention for patients with cancer. Psychooncology. 2009; 18: 465-475.
  • 13
    Culos-Reed SN, Carlson LE, Daroux LM, Hately-Aldous S. A pilot study of yoga for breast cancer survivors: physical and psychological benefits. Psychooncology. 2006; 15: 891-897.
  • 14
    Danhauer SC, Mihalko SL, Russell GB, et al. Restorative yoga for women with breast cancer: findings from a randomized pilot study. Psychooncology. 2009; 18: 360-368.
  • 15
    Rao MR, Raghuram N, Nagendra HR, et al. Anxiolytic effects of a yoga program in early breast cancer patients undergoing conventional treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2009; 17: 1-8.
  • 16
    Vadiraja HS, Rao MR, Nagarathna R, et al. Effects of yoga program on quality of life and affect in early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2009; 17: 274-280.
  • 17
    Chandwani KD, Thornton B, Perkins GH, et al. Yoga improves quality of life and benefit finding in women undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2010; 8: 43-55.
  • 18
    Moadel AB, Shah C, Wylie-Rosett J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of yoga among a multiethnic sample of breast cancer patients: effects on quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 4387-4395.
  • 19
    Bower JE, Garet D, Sternlieb B. Yoga for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors: results of a pilot study [serial online]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 623168, 2011.
  • 20
    Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483.
  • 21
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Aziz N, Fahey JL. Fatigue and proinflammatory cytokine activity in breast cancer survivors. Psychosom Med. 2002; 64: 604-611.
  • 22
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Aziz N, Fahey JL, Cole SW. T-cell homeostasis in breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95: 1165-1168.
  • 23
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Dickerson SS, Petersen L, Aziz N, Fahey JL. Diurnal cortisol rhythm and fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005; 30: 92-100.
  • 24
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Aziz N. Altered cortisol response to psychologic stress in breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67: 277-280.
  • 25
    Bower JE, Ganz PA, Aziz N, Olmstead R, Irwin MR, Cole SW. Inflammatory responses to psychological stress in fatigued breast cancer survivors: relationship to glucocorticoids. Brain Behav Immun. 2007; 21: 251-258.
  • 26
    Collado-Hidalgo A, Bower JE, Ganz PA, Cole SW, Irwin MR. Inflammatory biomarkers for persistent fatigue in breast cancer survivors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12: 2759-2766.
  • 27
    Iyengar BKS. Yoga: The Path to Holistic Health. London, United Kingdom: Dorling Kindersley Ltd.; 2001.
  • 28
    Donovan KA, Jacobsen PB. The Fatigue Symptom Inventory: a systematic review of its psychometric properties. Support Care Cancer. 2010; 19: 169-185.
  • 29
    Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, et al. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 301-310.
  • 30
    Stein KD, Martin SC, Hann DM, Jacobsen PB. A multidimensional measure of fatigue for use with cancer patients. Cancer Pract. 1998; 6: 143-152.
  • 31
    Bower JE. Behavioral symptoms in patients with breast cancer and survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 768-777.
  • 32
    Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck Depression Inventory-II. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1996.
  • 33
    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Hoch CC, Yeager AL, Kupfer DJ. Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Sleep. 1991; 14: 331-338.
  • 34
    Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
  • 35
    Csuka M, McCarty DJ. Simple method for measurement of lower extremity muscle strength. Am J Med. 1985; 78: 77-81.
  • 36
    Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol. 1990; 45: M192-M197.
  • 37
    Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74: 1143-1152.
  • 38
    Shively M, Smith TL, Bormann J, Gifford AL. Evaluating self-efficacy for HIV disease management skills. AIDS Behav. 2002; 6: 371-379.
  • 39
    Ferguson RJ, Robinson AB, Splaine M. Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 509-516.
  • 40
    Donovan KA, Jacobsen PB, Small BJ, Munster PN, Andrykowski MA. Identifying clinically meaningful fatigue with the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008; 36: 480-487.
  • 41
    Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Motivala SJ. Improving sleep quality in older adults with moderate sleep complaints: a randomized controlled trial of Tai Chi Chih. Sleep. 2008; 31: 1001-1008.
  • 42
    Banasik J, Williams H, Haberman M, Blank SE, Bendel R. Effect of Iyengar yoga practice on fatigue and diurnal salivary cortisol concentration in breast cancer survivors. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011; 23: 135-142.
  • 43
    Vadiraja HS, Raghavendra RM, Nagarathna R, et al. Effects of a yoga program on cortisol rhythm and mood states in early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Integr Cancer Ther. 2009; 8: 37-46.
  • 44
    Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Christian L, Preston H, et al. Stress, inflammation, and yoga practice. Psychosom Med. 2010; 72: 113-121.
  • 45
    Pullen PR, Nagamia SH, Mehta PK, et al. Effects of yoga on inflammation and exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2008; 14: 407-413.
  • 46
    West J, Otte C, Geher K, Johnson J, Mohr DC. Effects of Hatha yoga and African dance on perceived stress, affect, and salivary cortisol. Ann Behav Med. 2004; 28: 114-118.
  • 47
    Orre IJ, Murison R, Dahl AA, Ueland T, Aukrust P, Fosso SD. Levels of circulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and C-reactive protein in long-term survivors of testicular cancer with chronic cancer-related fatigue. Brain Behav Immun. 2009; 23: 868-874.
  • 48
    Alexander S, Minton O, Andrews P, Stone P. A comparison of the characteristics of disease-free breast cancer survivors with or without cancer-related fatigue syndrome. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45: 384-392.
  • 49
    Bower JE. Cancer-related fatigue: links with inflammation in cancer patients and survivors. Brain Behav Immun. 2007; 21: 863-871.