Fax: (011) 49-931-201-635000
Original Article
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma
Article first published online: 11 DEC 2012
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27866
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Al-Ibraheem, A., Buck, A. K., Benz, M. R., Rudert, M., Beer, A. J., Mansour, A., Pomykala, K. L., Haller, B., Juenger, H., Scheidhauer, K., Schwaiger, M. and Herrmann, K. (2013), 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer, 119: 1227–1234. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27866
- †
Fax: (011) 49-931-201-635000
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 MAR 2013
- Article first published online: 11 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 18 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 27 AUG 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- hybrid imaging;
- positron emission tomography/computed tomography;
- 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose;
- sarcoma;
- recurrence
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The clinical utility of modern hybrid imaging modalities for detecting recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma remains to be determined. In this report, the authors present a clinical study on the diagnostic accuracy and incremental value of integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with a history of sarcoma who have clinically suspected disease recurrence.
METHODS:
Forty-three patients who had a history of bone or soft tissue sarcoma and had documented complete remission underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. Image analysis was performed independently for 18F-FDG PET (n = 43) and for contrast-enhanced spiral CT (CE-CT) (n = 30) by 2 separate readers, whereas combined 18F-FDG PET/CT (n = 43) images were analyzed in consensus by both readers. Imaging findings were rated on a 5-point scale and finally were reported as malignant, benign, or equivocal. Imaging findings were validated either by histopathology (n = 24) or by clinical follow-up (n = 19).
RESULTS:
18F-FDG PET/CT had greater sensitivity and specificity compared with CE-CT alone (94% and 92% vs 78% and 67%, respectively), resulting in significantly greater accuracy (93% vs 73%; P = .03). 18F-FDG PET/CT was particularly superior regarding detection of local recurrence or soft tissue lesions (sensitivity and specificity: 83% and 100% vs 50% and 100%, respectively) or bone metastases (100% and 100% vs 85% and 88%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS:
18F-FDG PET/CT had greater diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma compared with CE-CT alone. The detection of local recurrence was the most evident advantage of 18F-FDG PET/CT over CE-CT. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

1097-0142/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=ca681f5719430b26e1bc15e9ea4c9fc0a7110104)
1097-0142/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=8142566facf7e76aef9be6c51162a2e920b3b9f9)
