C.-Y.H. and G.J.C. conceived and designed the study. C.-Y.H. and Y.X. input the data and undertook statistical analysis of the data. C.-Y.H. and G.J.C. drafted the article. G.J.C. and J.N.C. reviewed and revised the article. All authors have read and approved the final version of the article.
Assessing the utility of cancer-registry–processed cause of death in calculating cancer-specific survival
Article first published online: 13 FEB 2013
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society
Volume 119, Issue 10, pages 1900–1907, 15 May 2013
How to Cite
Hu, C.-Y., Xing, Y., Cormier, Janice. N. and Chang, G. J. (2013), Assessing the utility of cancer-registry–processed cause of death in calculating cancer-specific survival. Cancer, 119: 1900–1907. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27968
- Issue published online: 6 MAY 2013
- Article first published online: 13 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 6 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Received: 19 OCT 2012
- We are grateful to the National Cancer Institute for providing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program
- 1Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER Program research data (1973-2007). Released April 2010, based on the November 2009 submission. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch; 2010.
- 9Annotated bibliography of cause-of-death validation studies. Vital Health Stat 2. 1982; 89: 1-42., .
- 12Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
- 13Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 6th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press; 2005..
- 16Estimating relative survival for cancer patients from the SEER Program using expected rates based on Ederer I versus Ederer II method. Technical Report 2011-01. Bethesda, MD: Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute; 2011. Available at: http://surveillance.cancer.gov/reports/. [Accessed December 1, 2012.], , , .