We acknowledge the cooperation and efforts of the Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System (Minnesota's cancer registry) and the cancer survivors, their physicians, and their loved ones who contributed to the collection of these data. The authors assume full responsibility for analyses and interpretation of these data.
The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life
Article first published online: 4 APR 2013
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society
Volume 119, Issue 12, pages 2342–2349, 15 June 2013
How to Cite
Atherton, P. J., Smith, T., Singh, J. A., Huntington, J., Diekmann, B. B., Huschka, M. and Sloan, J. A. (2013), The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life. Cancer, 119: 2342–2349. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28046
- Issue published online: 4 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 4 APR 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 11 FEB 2013
- Manuscript Received: 7 JAN 2013
- quality of life;
- decision analysis;
- quality of care;
- control preferences;
- cancer survivors
The objective of this study was to explore relations between patient role preferences during the cancer treatment decision-making process and quality of life (QOL).
One-year cancer survivors completed a survey in 2000 as part of a larger survey conducted by the American Cancer Society. The current report was based on survey respondents from Minnesota (response rate, 37.4%). Standardized measures included the Profile of Mood States (scores were converted to have a range, from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best mood), the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) (standardized scores), and the Control Preferences Scale. Patients' actual and preferred role preference distributions and concordance between roles were compared with QOL scores using 2-sample t test methodology.
The actual role of survivors (n = 594) in cancer care was 33% active, 50% collaborative, and 17% passive. Their preferred role was 35% active, 53% collaborative, and 13% passive. Overall, 88% of survivors had concordant preferred and actual roles. Survivors who had concordant roles had higher SF-36 Physical Component Scale (PCS) scores (P < .01), higher vitality (P = .01), less fatigue (P < .01), less confusion (P = .01), less anger (P = .046), and better overall mood (P = .01). These results were similar among both women and younger individuals (aged <60 years). Survivors who had active actual roles had higher PCS scores (P < .01), less tension (P = .04), and higher vitality (P = .04) than survivors who were either collaborative or passive. No differences existed in QOL scores according to preferred role.
Survivors who experienced discordance between their actual role and their preferred role reported substantial QOL deficits in both physical and emotional domains. These results indicate the need to support patient preferences. Cancer 2013;119:2342–2349. © 2013 American Cancer Society.