European-American Dialogues on Cancer Survivorship: Current Perspectives and Emerging Issues
Current perspectives and emerging issues on cancer rehabilitation
Article first published online: 20 MAY 2013
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society
Supplement: European-American Dialogues on Cancer Survivorship: Current Perspectives and Emerging Issues
Volume 119, Issue Supplement S11, pages 2170–2178, 1 June 2013
How to Cite
Stubblefield, M. D., Hubbard, G., Cheville, A., Koch, U., Schmitz, K. H. and Dalton, S. O. (2013), Current perspectives and emerging issues on cancer rehabilitation. Cancer, 119: 2170–2178. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28059
This supplement was guest edited by Vittorio Mattioli, MD (NCRC, Bari, Italy) and Kevin Stein, PhD (American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia) and was produced with the authoritative contribution of 58 authors from the European Union and the United States. The primary aims are to highlight the potential differences between European and American approaches to cancer survivors' issues, increase coordination among oncologists and other primary care providers, and aid the development of a shared care model that can improve the quality of cancer care.
The opinions or views expressed in this supplement are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the journal editors, the American Cancer Society, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., or the National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” Bari.
- Issue published online: 20 MAY 2013
- Article first published online: 20 MAY 2013
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 DEC 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 21 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Received: 27 JUL 2012
- 2Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation: a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:76-87., .
- 4International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). GLOBOCAN Fact Sheet. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/cancers/all.asp. [Accessed March 12, 2013].
- 8Rehabilitation After Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer and Prostate Cancer—A Medical Technology Assessment [in Danish]. Copenhagen, Denmark: National Board of Health, Monitoring and Medical Technology Assessment; 2010., , , et al.
- 9National Cancer Action Team (NCAT). Cancer and Palliative Care Rehabilitation Workforce Project: A Review of the Evidence. London, United Kingdom: NCAT; 2009.
- 11Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient's World” Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:1089-1100., , , , .
- 18American College of Surgeons. Commission on Cancer (COC) Accreditation Program. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2012.
- 22From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006., .
- 27Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 suppl 1):S32-S38., , .
- 40An examination of the causes for the underutilization of rehabilitation services among people with advanced cancer. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(5 suppl 1):S27-S37., , .
- 43National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast Cancer. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. 2 ed. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2001.
- 45Cancer Rehabilitation Principles and Practice. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2009., .
- 46NCCN Task Force Report: management of neuropathy in cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Network. 2009;7:S1-S26., , , et al.