The articles in this supplement were commissioned based on participation in evaluating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program.
Clinical case management and navigation for colonoscopy screening in an academic medical center
Article first published online: 18 JUL 2013
© 2013 American Cancer Society
Special Issue: Comprehensive Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program, Supplement to Cancer
Volume 119, Issue Supplement S15, pages 2894–2904, 1 August 2013
How to Cite
Cavanagh, M. F., Lane, D. S., Messina, C. R. and Anderson, J. C. (2013), Clinical case management and navigation for colonoscopy screening in an academic medical center. Cancer, 119: 2894–2904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28156
The opinions or views expressed in this supplement are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or recommendations of the journal editors, the American Cancer Society, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
At the time of this project, Dr. Cavanagh was at the Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY, and Dr. Anderson, was at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY.
We thank all of the collaborators of the Stony Brook University Medical Center SCOPE Project, who are listed elsewhere in this supplement.
- Issue published online: 18 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 18 JUL 2013
- Manuscript Revised: 28 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 12 JUL 2012
- colorectal cancer;
- health centers;
- colorectal cancer screening;
- academic medical center
One of 5 nationally funded Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Demonstration Programs, Project SCOPE, was conducted at an academic medical center and provided colonoscopy screening at no cost to underserved minority patients from local community health centers.
Established barriers to CRC screening (eg, financial, language, transportation) among the target population were addressed through clinical coordination of care by key project staff. The use of a clinician with a patient navigator allowed for the performance of precolonoscopy “telephone visits” instead of office visits to the gastroenterologist in virtually all patients. The clinician elicited information relevant to making screening decisions (eg, past medical and surgical history, focused review of systems, medication/supplement use, CRC screening history). The patient navigator reduced barriers, including, but not limited to, scheduling, transportation, and physical navigation of the medical center on the day of colonoscopy.
Preprogram preparation was vital in laying groundwork for the project, yet enhancements to the program were ongoing throughout the screening period. Detailed referral forms from primary care physicians, coupled with information obtained during telephone interviews, facilitated high colonoscopy completion rates and excellent patient satisfaction. Similarly valuable was the employment of a bilingual patient navigator, who provided practical and emotional patient support.
Academic medical centers can be efficient models for providing CRC screening to disadvantaged populations. Coordination of care by a preventive medicine department, directing the recruitment, scheduling, prescreening education, and the evaluation and preparation of target populations had an overall positive effect on CRC screening with colonoscopy among patients from a community health center. Cancer 2013;119(15 suppl):2894–904. © 2013 American Cancer Society.