SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality--United States, 2002–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884889.
  • 2
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal cancer screening rates--prevention and early detection: keys to reducing deaths. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/screening_rates.htm. Posted 2011. Accessed November 4, 2011.
  • 3
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:19771981.
  • 4
    Healthy People 2020. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx. Accessed March 31, 2012.
  • 5
    Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal cancer screening -- United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60(suppl):4246.
  • 6
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 years--United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:808812.
  • 7
    Seeff LC, DeGroff A, Tangka F, et al. Development of a federally funded demonstration colorectal cancer screening program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A64.
  • 8
    Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Hoover S, et al. Costs of planning and implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28552862.
  • 9
    DeGroff A, Boehm J, Goode Green S, Holden D, Seeff LC. Facilitators and challenges to start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A39.
  • 10
    DeGroff A, Holden D, Goode Green S, Boehm J, Seeff LC, Tangka F. Start-up of the colorectal cancer screening demonstration program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A38.
  • 11
    Tangka FK, Subramanian S, Bapat B, et al. Cost of starting colorectal cancer screening programs: results from five federally funded demonstration programs. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5:A47.
  • 12
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Summary of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/colocancer/colosum.htm. Posted 2008. Accessed February 24, 2011.
  • 13
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Breast and Cervical Early Detection Program: 1991–2002 National Report. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2005.
  • 14
    Castro G, Azrak F, Seeff LC, Royalty J. Outpatient colonoscopy complications in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: a prospective analysis. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28492854.
  • 15
    Nadel M, Royalty J, Shapiro J, et al. Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28342841.
  • 16
    Seeff LC, Royalty J, Helsel WE, et al. Clinical outcomes from the federally funded colorectal cancer screening demonstration program. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28202833.
  • 17
    Tangka FKL, Subramanian S, Beebe MC, Hoover S, Seeff LC, Royalty J. Clinical costs of colorectal cancer screening in five federally funded demonstration programs. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28632869.
  • 18
    Boehm JE, Rohan EA, Preissle J, DeGroff A, Glover-Kudon R. Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across five sites. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):29142925.
  • 19
    Rohan EA, Boehm JE, DeGroff A, Glover-Kudon R, Preissle J. Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the field. Cancer. 2013;119(suppl 15):28702883.
  • 20
    Seeff LC, Major A, Townsend JS, et al. Comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions: partnering to launch successful colorectal cancer screening initiatives. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:20232031.
  • 21
    Li J, Nadel M, Poppell CF, Dwyer D, Lieberman DA, Steinberger EK. Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2010;(2010):419796.
  • 22
    Stake RE. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2006.
  • 23
    Stufflebeam D, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
  • 24
    Bowling CJ. Using the program life cycle can increase your return on time invested. Journal of Extension. 2001;39: article 3FEA2. http://joe.org/joe/2001june/a2.html. Accessed June 16, 2008.
  • 25
    Guinee JP. Erikson's Life Span Theory: a metaphor for conceptualizing the internship year. Prof Psychol. 1998;29:615620.
  • 26
    Tate YB, Parker S. Using Erikson's developmental theory to understand and nurture spiritual development in Christians. J Psychol Christianity. 2007;26:218226.
  • 27
    Tibbetts KA. Timing is everything: Using program monitoring and evaluation to support the development of effective and efficient programs. Kamehameha Schools Research & Evaluation. February 2010.
  • 28
    Krieger MH. Social indicators and the life cycle. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 1972;6:305317.
  • 29
    Yin RK. Case Study Research: Designs and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2009.
  • 30
    Schwandt TA. Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1994:118137.
  • 31
    Shank G. Abductive strategies in educational research. Am J Semiotics. 1987;5:275290.
  • 32
    Shank G. Qualitative Research: A Personal Skills Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall; 2002.
  • 33
    Kapitan T. In what way is abductive inference creative? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 1990;26:449512.
  • 34
    Miller S. Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2003:423455.
  • 35
    Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Glossary. In: Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2003:703--718.
  • 36
    Erzberger C, Kelle U. Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of integration. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2003:457488.
  • 37
    Bernard H, Ryan G. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010.
  • 38
    Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1996.
  • 39
    Kemp E. Metaphor as a tool for evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 1999;24:8190.
  • 40
    Rohan E, Bausch J. Climbing Everest: oncology work as an expedition in caring. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2009;27:84118.
  • 41
    Starr-Glass D. Metaphor and totem: exploring and evaluating prior experiential learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2002;27:221231.
  • 42
    Starr-Glass D. Metaphors and maps in evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2005;30:195207.
  • 43
    Richardson L. Writing: A method of inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2000:923948.
  • 44
    Steger T. The stories metaphors tell: metaphors as a tool to decipher tacit aspects in narratives. Field Methods. 2007;19:323.
  • 45
    Erikson EH. The Life Cycle Completed: A Review. 1st ed. New York, NY: Norton; 1982.
  • 46
    Erikson EH. Childhood and Society. 1st ed. New York, NY: Norton; 1950.
  • 47
    Erikson EH. Childhood and Society. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Norton; 1963.
  • 48
    Erikson EH. Life History and the Historical Moment. 1st ed. New York, NY: Norton; 1975.
  • 49
    Erikson EH. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, NY: Norton; 1980.
  • 50
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Checklist to Assess Preparedness (Readiness) for Screening. 2006. Available from the author.
  • 51
    Lantz PM, Soliman S. An evaluation of a Medicaid expansion for cancer care: The Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act of 2000. Womens Health Issues. 2009;19:221231.
  • 52
    Scheirer MA. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am J Eval. 2005;26:320347.
  • 53
    Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:e1e9.
  • 54
    Scheirer MA, Hartling G, Hagerman D. Defining sustainability outcomes of health programs: illustrations from an on-line survey. Eval Program Plann. 2008;31:335346.
  • 55
    Lane DS, Cavanagh MF, Messina CR, Anderson J. An academic medical center model for community colorectal cancer screening: the CDC demonstration experience. Acad Med. 2010;85:13541361.
  • 56
    Reverby SM. Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and Its Legacy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 2009.
  • 57
    Pancer SM, Westhues A. A developmental stage approach to program planning and evaluation. Eval Rev. 1989;13:5677.
  • 58
    Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2004.
  • 59
    Tripodi T, Fellin P, Epstein I. Social Program Evaluation: Guidelines for Health, Education, and Welfare Administrators. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock; 1971.
  • 60
    Frechtling JA. Logic Modeling Methods in Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
  • 61
    Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
  • 62
    Preskill H, Torres RT. Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1999.
  • 63
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP). National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Comprehensive Cancer Coalition Program. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/ncccp/index.htm. Accessed 2012.
  • 64
    Comprehensive Cancer Control National Partners. Tools, Resources, and News from the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Partners 2012; http://cccnationalpartners.org/. Accessed April 25, 2012.
  • 65
    DeGroff A, Schooley M, Chapel T, Poister T. Challenges and strategies in applying performance measurement to federal public health programs. Eval Program Plann. 2010;33:365372.
  • 66
    Poister TH. Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
  • 67
    Schon DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1983.
  • 68
    Merriam SB, Caffarella RS. Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1999.
  • 69
    Knowles MS. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge Books; 1980.
  • 70
    Kolb D. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984.
  • 71
    Ackoff RL. Ackoff's Best: His Classic Writings on Management. New York, NY: Wiley; 1999.
  • 72
    Rainey HG. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
  • 73
    Quinn RE, Cameron K. Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: some preliminary evidence. Management Sci. 1983;29:3351.
  • 74
    Lasker RD, Weiss ES, Miller R. Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. Milbank Q. 2001;79:179205.
  • 75
    Cancer Control PLANET. Links to comprehensive cancer control resources for public health professionals. http://cancercontrolplanet.cancer.gov/index.html. Accessed April 25, 2012.
  • 76
    Cohen DJ, Crabtree BF, Etz RS, et al. Fidelity versus flexibility. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5 suppl):S381S389.
  • 77
    Schorr LB. Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods to Rebuild America. New York, NY: Anchor Books; 1997.
  • 78
    Stake RE. The case study method in a social inquiry. Educational Researcher. 1978;7:58.
  • 79
    Washington University in St. Louis. Program Sustainability Assessment Tool Project. 2012; http://ctpr.wustl.edu/sustainability/. Accessed February 23, 2012.
  • 80
    Rabin BA, Brownson RC. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz G, Proctor E, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  • 81
    Leviton LC, Kettel Khan L, Rog D, Dawkins N, Cotton D. Evaluability assessment to improve public health policies, programs, and practices. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:213233.
  • 82
    Wholey JS. Evaluability Assessment. In: Wholey JS, Hatry HP, Newcomer KE, eds. Handbook for Practical Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2004.
  • 83
    Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler RW, Gagne RM, Scriven M, eds. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; 1967:3983.
  • 84
    Pluye P, Potvin L, Denis JL. Making public health programs last: conceptualizing sustainability. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2004;27:121133.
  • 85
    Shediac-Rizkallah MC, Bone LR. Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998;13:87108.
  • 86
    Patton MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.